상세 컨텐츠

본문 제목

Sode Es Informatica Mac Manual Integracion Index

카테고리 없음

by marememi1977 2021. 1. 14. 20:34

본문



  1. Sode Es Informatica Mac Manual Integracion Index En
  2. Sode Es Informatica Mac Manual Integracion Index 2017
  3. Sode Es Informatica Mac Manual Integracion Index 2017
  4. Macbook Manual

Endless places to call home

No hidden costs and free cancellation for most properties.

  1. Informatica uses cookies to enhance your user experience and improve the quality of our websites. Unless you disable cookies, you consent to the placement and use of cookies as described in our Cookie Policy by continuing to use this website.
  2. Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what you're looking for.

Discover homes

Get inspiration for your next trip

Es importante que no flexionemos el tronco, y, de ser posible, que cerremos los ojos en el momento de quedarnos sobre un solo apoyo. Split: Desde posicin vertical, nos inclinamos sobre una pierna y adelantamos la pierna e intentamos llegar lo ms lejos posible sin mover el pie de apoyo.

Connect with other travellers

    Community name

    xx,xxx travellers

    Community name

    xx,xxx travellers

    Community name

    xx,xxx travellers

    Community name

    xx,xxx travellers

Destinations we love

  • Regions
  • Cities
  • Places of Interest
    • Lake District3,343 properties
    • Isle of Wight1,171 properties
    • Bodrum1,018 properties
    • Tenerife9,200 properties
    • Ibiza1,586 properties
    • Cornwall5,961 properties
    • Lake Como4,647 properties
    • Santorini1,714 properties
    • Ras Al Khaimah106 properties
    • Majorca10,284 properties
    • Phuket Province5,158 properties
    • Corfu3,946 properties
    • Jersey91 properties
    • New Forest249 properties
    • Lanzarote3,962 properties
    • Cotswolds1,561 properties
    • Loch Lomond319 properties
    • Devon5,562 properties
    • Mykonos1,417 properties
    • Muscat Governorate323 properties
    • Times Square1,427 properties
    • St Pancras International Station13,866 properties
    • Masjid Al Haram484 properties
    • Thorpe Park11 properties
    • Wembley Stadium13,866 properties
    • Hyde Park13,866 properties
    • NEC Birmingham20 properties
    • The Shard13,866 properties
    • The Land of Legends Theme Park260 properties
    • Tayto Park5 properties
    • O2 Arena13,866 properties
    • Flamingo Land Theme Park106 properties
    • Alton Towers9 properties
    • Legoland Windsor152 properties
    • Eiffel Tower5,957 properties
    • Disneyland Paris5,957 properties
    • Harry Potter Studio Tour3 properties
    • Longleat Safari Park25 properties
    • Universal Studios Orlando4,159 properties
    • Blackpool Pleasure Beach856 properties
Whoever you are, whatever you're looking for, we have the perfect place for you. Our 29,004,706 listingsinclude 6,210,621 listings of homes, apartments, and other unique places to stay,and are located in 153,346 destinations in 227 countries and territories. Booking.com B.V. is based in Amsterdam, the Netherlands and is supported internationally by 198 offices in 70 countries.
Copyright © 1996–2019Booking.com™. All rights reserved.

Booking.com is part of Booking Holdings Inc., the world leader in online travel and related services.

Start of dialog content

https://renewpm727.weebly.com/blog/traveller-rpg-pdf. We have more than 70 million property reviews, and they're all from real, verified guests.

How does it work?

  • It starts with a booking

    It starts with a booking

    The only way to leave a review is to first make a booking. That's how we know our reviews come from real guests who have stayed at the property.

  • Followed by a trip

    Followed by a trip

    When guests stay at the property, they check out how quiet the room is, how friendly the staff is, and more.

  • And finally, a review

    And finally, a review

    After their trip, guests tell us about their stay. We check for naughty words and verify the authenticity of all guest reviews before adding them to our site.

If you booked through us and want to leave a review, please sign in first.

End of dialog content
This website uses cookies. Click here for more information. If that’s okay with you, just keep browsing.Close
Sign in to your account
or
Sign in with FacebookSign in with Google
Don't have an account yet? Create your account

Columbia University Computing History

A Chronology of Computing at Columbia University
Frank da Cruz
Academic Information Systems
Watson Laboratory,Columbia University
612 West 115th Street
New York NY 10025 USA
1977-2011
fdc@columbia.edu

Books, manuals, journals, magazines, notes, andartifacts. 65 years of computing at Columbia University.

Last update:Sun Aug 4 14:30:40 2019 Adapted for mobile devices 4 April 2015. Converted to HTML5 7 February 2019.

[ Credits ][ Introduction ][ Timeline ][ Epilog ][ Tables ][ Acronyms ][ Glossary ][ Sources ][ Links ][ FAQ ]


The world's most powerful computerat Columbia University's Watson Lab,612 West 115th Street NYC, 5th floor rear, 1954.
[ Early ][ 1920 ][ 1930 ][ 1940 ][ 1950 ][ 1960 ][ 1970 ][ 1980 ][ 1990 ][ 2000 ][ 2010 ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]
Recent Developments
Eleanor Krawitz Kolchinpassed away 25 January 2019.
Many pages converted to HTML5 and fluid design (for cell phones), 2018-2019.
New pages or popular ones with new content include:The original card punch,Old card punches,IBM Radiotype (and World War II),IBM 405,IBM 610 (the first 'personal computer'),IBM 360/91,Films with old computers.
Beginning in 2017, some pages at this site have been translated intoother languages. The most prominent examples are the pages on Watson Labalumni John Backus andHerb Grosch, Watson Lab founderWallace Eckert, and the father of modern automaticcomputation, Herman Hollerith. And also a1949 Columbia Engineering Quarterly article,The Watson Scientific Computing Laboratory:A Center for Scientific Research Using Calculating Machines byWatson Lab Tabulating Supervisor Eleanor Krawitz.Click here toread more about translations.
Supplement: Hollerith
An Electric TabulatingSystemby Herman Hollerith, The Quarterly,Columbia University School of Mines, Vol.X No.16 (Apr 1889),pp.238-255.
Supplement: Grosch
Computer: Bit Slices from aLife by Dr. Herb Grosch(2003), 500+ pages, including several chapters on IBM's Watson ScientificComputing Laboratory at Columbia University in the 1940s and 50s.[ Also available in PDF ]Herb Grosch passed away January 25, 2010.
Supplement: Brennan
The IBM Watson Laboratory atColumbia University - A History by Jean Ford Brennan(1971). 76 pages, 25 photos. The history of IBM-sponsoredcomputing research and laboratories at Columbia University, 1928 though1970.
Supplement: Hankam
Homeward Bound, thememoir of computing education pioneer Eric Hankam,including his escape from Nazi Europe, his time at IBM Watson Laboratory atColumbia University, and his continuing adventures.
Supplement: Krawitz
The Watson Scientific ComputingLaboratory by Eleanor Krawitz, Columbia EngineeringQuarterly, November 1949.
Personalities:
[ Herman Hollerith ][ Wallace Eckert ][ L.H. Thomas ][ Herb Grosch ][ John Backus ][ John Lentz ][ Ben Wood ][ L.J. Comrie ][ John McPherson ]
IBM Punched-Card Machines:
[ Tabulators ][ Sorters ][ Key Punches ][ Calculators ][ Interpreters ][ Reproducers ][ Collators ]
Making History:
Local Milestones:
  • 1977: DEC-20s ]
  • 1994: Columbia Website ]
This document gives a chronology of computing at Columbia University, asbest I can piece it together, written mainly in Jan-Feb 2001, updatedperiodically since then (time of last update listed above). It does notaspire to be a general history or museum of computing, but in some ways it'snot far from one either. Corrections, additional information, and morephotos are always welcome. In most cases where the text says 'today', thatmeans 2001; obviously much has changed since then.
If you came here looking for the history of the Kermit protocol, Kermitsoftware, or the Kermit Project, you can findsome of it below in the 1980-82 timeframe, and a bit moreHERE. Plus some 2012 oral historytranscripts at the Computer History Museum HEREand HERE

Who am I and why did I write this? Starting around 2000, peoplepopped into my office all the time to ask 'when did such-and-such happen?'— the first e-mail, the first typesetting, the first networking, thefirst PC lab, the first hacker breakins, etc -- since I was there for mostof it. So I took some time and wrote it down, and in so doing becamefascinated with the earlier history. I was a user of the Columbia ComputerCenter from 1967 until 1977 in my various jobs and as a Columbia student,and I was on staff from 1974 until 2011. Brief bio: After some earlyprogramming experience in the Army (mid-1960s), the Engineering School andPhysics Dept (late 1960s, early 70s), and Mount Sinai Hospital (early 70s),I came to work at the Computer Center Systems Group in 1974, hired by itsmanager Howard Eskin out of his graduate Computer Science classes. After ayear of OS/360 programming, I was manager of the PDP-11/50 and the DEC-20s(first e-mail, early networking, the first campuswide academic timesharing),then manager of 'Systems Integration' (first microcomputers, PCs, Kermit),principal investigator of the 'Hermit' distributed computing researchproject, then manager of Network Planning for the University and chair ofthe University-wide Network Planning Group, before 'retiring' tothe Kermit Project, which hadless (well, zero) meetings and way more fun. I was laid off from Columbiain 2011 but still have access to this website. (Note: the Columbia KermitProject website was cancelled and its website frozen July 1, 2011; the newOpen Source Kermit Project websiteis HERE.)

Capsule Summary

Automatic computing at Columbia University got off to a serious start in the1920s in the with the installation of large IBM accounting and calculatingmachines in the Statistics and Astronomy departments and a closerelationship that developed with IBM that would last 50 years. Columbiasoon developed a world-class reputation for innovationin scientific computing. As World War II approached,Columbia astronomy professor Wallace Eckert wasrecruited by the US Naval Observatory toapply the techniques he had developed at Columbia to the production of thealmanacs that guided air and sea navigationthroughout the war. At the end of the war Eckert rejoined Columbia as thefounder and director of IBM Watson ScientificComputing Laboratory on 116th Street, IBM's first pure researchfacility, which also served as Columbia's 'computer center,' and created theworld's first Computer Science curriculum. Severalgroundbreaking early computers were designed and/or built and Watson Lab.In 1963Columbia opened its own Computer Center on campusunderneath the Business School. From 1963 to 1975 all computing at was doneon large central IBM mainframes, with a handful ofsmaller computers in the departments. Jobs were coded on punched cards andrun by operators in the Computer Center machine room. In 1973 apublic Self-Service Input/Output area (SSIO)was opened with key punches, card readers, and printers where users couldsubmit jobs and retrieve the results themselves. Beginning in 1975interactive timesharing was introduced based oncentral Digital Equipment Corporation computerswith public hardcopy and video terminals installed inthe SSIO area and in the Engineeringbuilding. Other terminal rooms were added over time, mainly inthe dormitories. During 1977-80 a lively onlinecommunity developed, with email, bulletin boards, and file sharing, whilecourses increasingly required the use of the central computers, or tookadvantage of them in other ways. In the 1980s public terminals weregradually replaced by microcomputers, PCs, and workstations connected to thecentral computers through their serial ports, like terminals. Columbiajoined the ARPANET (later to become the Internet) in 1984. The terminalnetwork was replaced in stages by Ethernet, which was also extended todormitory rooms, offices, and even apartments. About 1995 the combinationof Windows 95 and the World Wide Web led to widespread migration fromcentralized timesharing to distributed desktop computing, wired and thenincreasingly wireless. Students began to arrive with their own computers,laptops, tablets, and mobile devices; the need for public PC labs dwindled.By 2005 or so, the Computer Center merely provided the infrastructure,mainly the network, e-classrooms, and email.Now even email has beenoutsourced.

Disclaimers

  1. Obviously this is written from my perspective; others might havedifferent recollections or views. In particular, at least after 1963, thisturns out to be more a history of centralized academic computing, ratherthan all computing, at Columbia, giving short shrift to the departments,administrative computing, the libraries, and the outlying campuses; a morecomplete history needs these perspectives too. I've made every attempt tocheck the facts; any remaining errors are mine -- please feel free to point them out.
  2. Computers are value-neutral tools that can be used for goodor evil, and it is clear that from the very beginning they have been usedfor both. This document does not aim to extol the virtues of computers ingeneral, nor of any particular company that makes them, but only tochronicle their use at Columbia University.

Acknowledgements

Watson Scientific Computing Laboratory at Columbia University(with Watson Lab dates)
Herb Grosch (1945-51),Eric Hankam (1945-59),Ellie (Krawitz) Kolchin (1947-58),John H. (Jack) Palmer (1949-57)[4],James U. (Jim) Lemke (1948-50),Daniel (Dan) Robbins (1949-53),John Backus (1950-52),Ken Schreiner (1951-60),Seymour Koenig (1952-70; Director 1967-70),Harry F. Smith (1956-1967),Joe Traub(Watson Fellow 1956-59),Ken King(Watson Fellow 1955-56, technical staff 1957-62),Jessica (Hellwig) Gordon (1957-58),Mike Radow (High School Science Honors Program, late 1950s),Peter Capek (High School Science Honors Program, early 1960s),Steve Bellovin (Columbia studentand Watson Lab employee, 1968-69).
Former Columbia Computer Center Directors
Ken King (1963-71),Jessica Gordon (1971-73),Bruce Gilchrist (1973-85),Howard Eskin (1985-86),Vaçe Kundakcı (1989-2005).
Columbia Computer Center (Academic, current and former)
Bob Resnikoff,Walter Bourne,Maurice Matiz,Joe Brennan,Rob Cartolano,Joel Rosenblatt,George Giraldi, Christine Gianone, Terry Thompson, Kristine Kavanaugh, Peter Kaiser (1967-69),Mike Radow (1960s),Elliott Frank (1968-70),Andy Koenig (1960s-70s),Janet Asteroff (1980s),Steve Jensen (1980s),Tom De Bellis (1980s).
Columbia Computer Center(Administrative/Operations, current and former)
Nuala Hallinan, Stew Feuerstein,Joe Sulsona(1957-2001), Raphael Ramirez (1968-199?),Alan Rice (1960s), Peter Humanik, Ben García.
Columbia Faculty
Joe Traub (Computer Science Department founder and previously Chair),Steve Bellovin (Computer Science Department, formerly of Bell Labs), AndrewDolkart (School of Architecture, Planning & Preservation), Bob McCaughey(Barnard College History Department). Many of the Watson Lab technicalstaff and Computer Center directors were also on the Columbia faculty.PERSONAL THANKS to Professor Emeritus LeonJ. Lidofsky (Applied Physics and Nuclear Engineering) for getting mehooked on programming and giving me the run of his 1960s-era computer lab;without this push I'd probably still be an overeducated taxi driver!
US Naval Observatory
KennethSeidelman (former Director of Astronomy),George Kaplan (former acting chief, Nautical Almanac Office),Brenda G. Corbin (Librarian).
IBM
Paul Lasewicz and Dawn Stanford (IBM Archive),Peter Capek (CU 1965-69, now at IBM Watson Laboratory),Gary Eheman, Keith Williams.
The Parnassus Club
Nuala Hallinan plus former residents Barbara L. Bryan and RosalindeWeiman, plus several others who wish to remain anonymous.
And.
Simon Rackham for the 1968 computer movie,Ruth Dayhoff (Director of Medical Digital Imaging, US Dept of VeteransAffairs),Ed Reinhart (Formerly of RAND Corp, JPL, and Comsat),Mary Louise McKee (NORC programmer, US Naval Proving Ground Dahlgren VA),George Trimble (Aberdeen Proving Ground, IBM),John C Alrich (Burroughs/ElectroData),Loren Wilton (Burroughs/Unisys),Ellen Alers (Smithsonian Institution),Garry Tee (Dept of Math, University of Auckland NZ),Allan Olley (University of Toronto),Charlotte Moseley (formerly of the County of San Diego Data ProcessingCenter),Pnina Stern (formerly Pnina Grinberg of BASR),Annette Lopes (CU Associate Registrar, then Associate Director of StudentServices, now [2011] Executive Director, Human Resources, Finance andAdministration);Jocelyn Wilk, Steve Urgola, and Mae Pan (Columbia University Archives andColumbiana);Bill Santini (CU Student Services).

I was inspired by Bruce Gilchrist'sForty Years of Computing article from 1981[3](so that makes it sixtyseventy78 years!)

Special thanks to Bruce Gilchrist and Nuala Hallinan, each ofwhom contributed valuable archive material and considerable time, effort,and miles to this project; to Herb Grosch for his awesome book aswell as tons of new information, corrections, insights, anecdotes, andartifacts; to Eric Hankam for the loan of his personal archive of photos andmaterials, his autobiography, and a wealth of Watson Lab recollections; toCharlotte Moseley for preserving and contributing a large number of old IBMmanuals; and to Bob Resnikoff who unearthed his long-lost cache of 1980machine-room and MSS photos. Herb, in particular, was involved in thisproject on a daily basis since he first happened upon it in May 2003 untilshortly before his death at 91 in January 2010. Herb rememberedeverything.

And thanks to the editors ofIEEE Annals of the History ofComputing for an announcement and abstract of this site in theirApril-June 2002 issue, and for announcing the online version of Herb Grosch'sbook in the July-September 2003 issue.

Please report any broken links directly to the author.

[ Introduction ][ Timeline ][ Epilog ][ Tables ][ Acronyms ][ Glossary ][ Sources ][ Links ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]

Introduction

At the dawn of the new Millenium, computers and the network are ubiquitous; wecan't live without them. It wasn't always so. How did we get here? A seriesof technological innovations including Pascal's adder (the Pascaline, 1600s),Leibnitz's multiplier (the Stepped Reckoner, about 1700), the Jacquard loom (1804), the Babbage Analytical andDifference Engines (1820s-30s), electricity and electromagnetism, thetelegraph, the Hollerith tabulating machine(1890), the relay, the vacuum tube, core memory, the transistor, the laser,the integrated circuit, and on and on, each resulted in products thatstimulated applications, which in turn stimulated the demand for more andbetter products, and before long computers entered the economy and the popularculture.

A case can be made that the computer industry got its start at ColumbiaUniversity in the late 1920s and early 1930s when Professors Wood andEckert, to advance their respective sciences, began to send designs andspecifications for computing machines to IBM Corporation, which until then hadbeen a maker of punched-card tabulating machines for thebusiness market. From those days through the 1980s, the relationship ofColumbia with companies like IBM was symbiotic and fruitful(and continues on a smaller scale to this day, mainly in the Physicsdepartment with the construction of massively parallel supercomputers -- whoelse would know how to connect 512 processors in a6-dimension mesh withthe topology of a torus?) IBM Corporation itself was the childof Columbian Herman Hollerith.

The early days of invention and innovation are past. Computers and networksare now well established in the daily lives of vast numbers of people in manynations, and certainly at Columbia University. Today's computersare off-the-shelf mass-market consumer appliances, which was perhapsinevitable and is no doubt a good thing in some ways. How this came aboutis a story told elsewhere but as you'll see below, some important partsof it happened right here.

[ Introduction ][ Timeline ][ Epilog ][ Tables ][ Acronyms ][ Glossary ][ Sources ][ Links ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]

Timeline

[ Early ][ 1920 ][ 1930 ][ 1940 ][ 1950 ][ 1960 ][ 1970 ][ 1980 ][ 1990 ][ 2000 ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]

The story of computing at Columbia is presented chronologically. Most linksare to local documents, and therefore will work as long as allthe files accompanying this document are kept together. There are also afew relatively unimportant external links, which are bound to go bad sooneror later -- such is the Web.

1754-1897:
Columbia University was established byKing George IIof England in 1754 (HUMOR)in downtown Manhattan near what is now City Hall. Thecampus moved to 49th Street and Madison Avenue in 1857, and from there to itspresent site at 116th Street and Broadway in 1897.
1879-1924:
In 1879, Herman Hollerith (1860-1929) received his Engineer ofMines (EM) degree from the Columbia UniversitySchool of Mines[48]. After graduation he stayed on as an assistant toone of his professors, W.P. Trowbridge, who later went on to what was tobecome the US Census Bureau and took Hollerith with him. This led toHollerith's development of the modern standard punch card and thetabulating machine and sorter that were used toprocess the 1890 Census [40]. Hollerith wrote up hisinvention and submitted it to the Columbia School of Mines, which granted hima PhD in 1890 [48]. Hollerith's name is synonymouswith the advent of automatic computing; until about 1940, punched-cardcalculators, tabulators, and so on were commonly called 'Hollerithmachines', even when they were made by other companies.
1896:
Herman Hollerith founds the Tabulating Machine Company, which wasto become (through various mergers and renamings) the International BusinessMachines company, IBM.
1900-1920:
Prof. Harold Jacoby, Chair of the Astronomy Department, in a memo dated4 December 1909, refers to 'Miss Harpham (our chief computer)' [28]. 'Computer' was an actual job title in those days,referring to someone whose job was to compute -- usually tables fromformulas -- by hand or using a mechanical calculator (more about this inHerb Grosch's Computer, Bit Slices of aLife, e.g. on page 4). The1917-18 Columbia University Bulletin, Division of Mathematical and PhysicalSciences, in the Equipment section, lists 'five computing machines' withoutfurther detail (you can find a list of possible candidates at the Universityof Amsterdam Computing Museum). Apropos of nothing, professor Jacobywas a graduate of the Columbia class of 1885, and organized a gift from thatclass to the University: the Vermont granite ballthat was mounted on the Sundial on 116th Street (now College Walk) from 1914to 1946, and now sits in the middle of a field in Michigan [54]. Jacoby died in 1932; Wallace Eckert (about whommuch more below) wrote his obituary in PopularAstronomy.
1906:
Hollerith brings his Type I Tabulator tomarket, the first with automatic card feedand the first such device that is 'programmable' via a plugboard.
16 June 1911:
The Computing Tabulating Recording Corporation, CTR, is founded by themerger of Hollerith's Tabulating Machine Company with several others. Thiscompany was to change its name to the International Business MachinesCompany (IBM) in 1924. IBM celebrated its 100th anniversary on 16 June 2011.
[ Top ]
[ Early ][ 1920 ][ 1930 ][ 1940 ][ 1950 ][ 1960 ][ 1970 ][ 1980 ][ 1990 ][ 2000 ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]
1924-26:
The Columbia University Statistical Laboratory (location unknown)includes Hollerith tabulating,punching, andsorting machines, Burroughs adding machines, Brunsviga andMillionairecalculators (the latter was the first device to perform direct multiplication),plus reference works such as math and statistical tables. Prof.Robert E. Chaddock (Statistics Dept) was in charge. The Astronomy department(Prof. H. Jacoby) still has the 'five computingmachines' [5].CLICK HERE for a gallery of late-1920s computingmachines.CLICK HERE for a 1926 aerial view of ColumbiaUniversity. CLICK HERE for a 1925 ColumbiaUniversity map.
1926:
Wallace Eckert (1902-1971) joinsColumbia's Astronomy faculty, specializing in celestial mechanics and mostespecially the moon. In pursuit of these interests, Eckert is to become atrue computer pioneer.
1928:
Benjamin Wood (1894-1986), head ofthe University Bureau of Collegiate Educational Research[5], proposes to Thomas J. Watson Sr., president of IBM,a method forautomated scoring of examination papers in large-scale testing programs (whichpreviously involved 'acres of girls trying to tabulate . test results' [45]). After some discussion, Watson sent three truckloadsof tabulating, card-punching, sorting, and accessory equipment to the basementof Hamilton Hall [9,40].
1928:
Meanwhile in England, L.J. Comrie (1893-1950),Superintendant of H.M. Nautical Almanac Office, begins a project to calculatefuture positions of the moon using punched cards, a sorter, a tabulator, and aduplicating punch, in what is probably the first use of these machines forscientific calculation [72]. This work wouldshortly inspire Columbia's Wallace Eckert to take thenext historic step: automating these calculations.
As we will see, much of the impetus towards automated scientific computation(and therefore modern computers) came from astronomers, and its primaryapplication was in navigation. The same impetus brought us accurate,portable timepieces in the previous century.
1928:
Columbia's medical school, the College of Physicians and Surgeons, movesfrom 10th Avenue and 55th-60th Streets to Washington Heights betweenBroadway and Fort Washington Avenue, 165th-168th Streets, the former siteof Hilltop Park(1903-1912), the baseball stadium of the New York Yankees (known as theNew York Highlanders until 1912).
Jun 1929:
Prof. Wood's operation became the Columbia University StatisticalBureau (PHOTOS). In addition to tabulatingtest results, it served as a 'computer center' for other academic departments,particularly the Dept of Astronomy, which used the equipment for 'interpolatingastronomical tables' [9,40].
[ Top ]
[ Early ][ 1920 ][ 1930 ][ 1940 ][ 1950 ][ 1960 ][ 1970 ][ 1980 ][ 1990 ][ 2000 ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]
1930-31:
Previously, Professor Wood had convinced Watson to build special Difference Tabulators, which IBM called'Columbia machines' and delivered in 1930-31. These machines could process150 cards per minute and were unique in their ability to rapidly accumulatesums of products or squares [9].The Statistical Bureau soon became a service provider to outsideorganizations like the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations, Yale, Harvard,and Princeton [9]. (So how much did wecharge? :-)
1931:
Walter S. Lemmon, a Columbia University Electrical Engineering graduateand president of the Radio Industries Corporation, demonstrated the firstworking Radiotype machine, an electrictypewriter coupled with radio transmitting and receiving apparatus. ThomasJ. Watson's contacts at Columbia put him in touch with Lemmon and IBM hiredhim. In 1935 Admiral Richard E. Byrd successfully sent a test Radiotypemessage 11,000 miles from Antarctica to an IBM receiving station inRidgewood, New Jersey.The Radiotype, originally intended for business applications, was adopted(after a successful between Washington DC and Dayton Ohio) by the US ArmySignal Corps for wartime use, allowing radio transmissions without manualtranscription to and also from Morse code. With the U.S. entry into WorldWar II, the Signal Corps ordered quantities of the Radiotype machines toequip its stations in New York, San Francisco, Dayton, Omaha, Seattle,Honolulu, Panama, Puerto Rico and elsewhere. Before the war was over,Radiotype machines had been outfitted with encryption equipment to providealmost instant transmission and receipt of securemessages [40]. Much more aboutthis HERE.
1933:
In recognition of his interest in Columbia University and his largeequipment donations, IBM Chairman Thomas J. Watsonis appointed Columbia Trustee. In return, Columbia President NicholasMurray Butler is appointed to IBM's Board ofDirectors [90].
1933-34:
Prof. Wallace J. Eckert (PHOTOS ANDBIOGRAPHY) of the Astronomy Department, a user of the StatisticalBureau, proposed modifications to IBM machines for advanced astronomicalcalculations, and within a few weeks the machines, including an IBM 601 Multiplying Punch (modified to Eckert'sspecifications under the supervision of IBM's G.W. Baehne [82] and dubbed the 'Astronomical Calculator' [81]) were delivered to the Rutherford Observatory in theattic of Pupin Hall. Until 1937 (q.v.) this facility was variously known as the RutherfordLaboratory, the Astronomical Laboratory, and the Hollerith ComputingBureau (the minutes of the 61st meeting of the American AstronomicalSociety, 29-30 Dec 1938, refer to a visit 'to the Hollerith ComputingBureau, where vast computing projects are being carried out under theDirection of Dr. Eckert'). It was the first permanent IBM installation inthe world to do scientific work (Comrie's Greenwich setup had not beenpermanent).

For his work, Eckert designed a control system basedon plugboards and rotating drums to interconnect the new equipment,eventually incorporating methods to solve differential equations by numericalintegration [9].The Astronomical Laboratory was the first to perform general scientificcalculations automatically [30]. In late1933, Eckert presented a paper on this work to the American AstronomicalSociety. Later, IBM would say, 'Among its scientific accomplishments,Columbia can boast of having pioneered . the use of automatic computingmachines for research work' [37]. A seemingly mundanebut significant aspect of this work was the new ability to feed the result ofone computation into the next and print the results of these calculationsdirectly, thus eliminating the transcription errors that were common inastronomical and lunar tables [17].

To illustrate with a 1946 quote from Kay Antonelli,University of Pennsylvania, referring to her wartime work [34], 'We did have desk calculators at that time,mechanical and driven with electric motors, that could do simple arithmetic.You'd do a multiplication and when the answer appeared, you had to write itdown to reenter it into the machine to do the next calculation. We werepreparing a firing table for each gun, with maybe 1,800 simpletrajectories. To hand-compute just one of these trajectories took 30 or 40hours of sitting at a desk with paper and a calculator.' Imagine the effectof a transcription error early in the 30-40 hour procedure.
1934-37:
Ben Wood and his Statistical Bureau work withIBM to develop mark-sense technology to improve the efficiency of processingstandardized tests [9]. The result was theIBM805 International TestScoring Machine, marketed beginning in 1937[38].Dr. Wood is remembered at Columbia through the Ben D. Wood GraduateFellowships in Learning Technologies, and at the Educational Testing Service, which dedicatedits largest building to him in 1965.
1935:
Practical Applications of the Punched Card Method in Colleges andUniversities, edited by George W. Baehne of IBM, published by ColumbiaUniversity Press; hardbound, 442 pages, 257 figures. Contains articles by BenWood and Wallace Eckert, among many others. Most of the applicationsdescribed are straighforward tabulating and bookkeeping operations; Eckert'sis the exception. CLICK HERE for a more detaileddiscussion of this book.
1936:
Wallace Eckert hires Lillian Feinstein [Hausman] as computing lab manager,placing her at or very near the head of the class of Women Pioneers ofComputing [100].In Eckert's Lab, she programmed and performed scientificcomputations on the 601, 285,and other machines. She stayed with Eckert until 1948, on loan for a timeto the US NavalObservatory [88],and then from 1945 on the Watson Lab technical staff. Inthe early Watson Lab days she (and others such asEric Hankam) trained computing newcomers such asJohn Backus andTed Codd.From the early Astronomical Lab equipment, she moved on tothe 602 (and 602-A), 604, theAberdeen Relay Calculators,and the SSEC, and when Columbia began to holdacademic computing courses in 1946, she ran Grosch's Engineering 281 NumericalMethods lab sessions. Much more about Lillian inHerb Grosch's bookCOMPUTER [88](in which Herb refers to her as 'the senior full-time scientificpunched card expert in the whole world' in 1946).

Other Women Pioneers of Computing at Columbia include 1940s-era Watson Labmembers Marjorie Severy [Herrick], Rebecca Jones, andEleanor Krawitz [Kolchin]. Grace Hopper,though by no means a Columbian, was present at the inaugural meeting of theAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM), held at Columbia in 1947.

The roster of Watson Lab technical staff (1945-70) is listed inBrennan [88]. Out of 207 professional staffmembers, 35 are definitely women. Many more are listed with only initials;some others by Romanized Chinese name (which generally does notindicate gender). But at least 17% of the technical staff were women, whichisn't bad for the postwar years, in which women were discouraged fromworking (or worse, laid off from their wartime jobs). Serial box mac osx.

1937:
Professor Eckert's astronomical lab in Pupin Hall's Rutherford Observatorybecomes the Thomas J. Watson Astronomical Computing Bureau (PHOTO), jointly sponsored by IBM, the AmericanAstronomical Society, and the Columbia Department of Astronomy [3,9,86],to serve as a resource forthe entire world astronomical community [38],making it the world's first center for scientificcomputation [84].
'The initial equipment of the Bureau consists of that which has been used bythe Department of Astronomy at Columbia University during the past few years. modified to make them more efficient for scientific work .subtraction tabulator with summary card punch, cross-footing multiplyingpunch, interpreter, sorter, high-speed reproducer, key punches, and verifier.
'Some possibiliies of the machines can begained from the program now in progress. This consists primarily of (1)numerical integration of the equations of planetary motion; (2) completechecking of the lunar theory; (3) computation of precession and rectangularco-ordinates for the Yale University Zone Catalogues; (4) thephotometric program of the Rutherford Observatory; and (5) problems of stellarstatistics.' [86].

Users of the Bureau were charged only for labor and materials (a tremendousbargain, since the equipment was donated).The Astronomical Computing Bureau would serve as a model for many of thewartime computing centers, such as those at Los Alamos, the Naval Observatory,and the Aberdeen Proving Grounds [30,90].

Citrix receiver enterprise mac download. While you can still download older versions of Citrix Receiver, new features and enhancements will be released for Citrix Workspace app.Citrix Workspace app is a new client from Citrix that works similar to Citrix Receiver and is fully backward-compatible with your organization’s Citrix infrastructure.

1938-40:
In 1938, Soviet astronomer Boris Numerov visits Eckert's lab to learn howpunched card equipment might be applied to 'stellar research' in his own labat St. Petersburg University in Moscow.
Numerov, Boris Vasilyevich:Thewebsiteof the Tosno Museum of Local History and Tradition (Leningrad Region) says(as of 12 Sep 2003)'An exhibit section is devoted to Boris Numerov (1891-1941) - a prominentastronomer, land-surveyor and geophysicist, a creator of various astronomicinstruments and means of minerals exploring. His family has lived in the townof Lyuban' not far from Tosno since 1922. In the times of Stalinistrepressions Boris Numerov was arrested and executed in 1941. In 1957 he wasrehabilitated.' Numerov is known today for the various algorithms and methodsthat bear his name.

In June 1940, a letter arrives for Eckert from V.N. Riazankin on behalf ofthe Astronomical Institute of the USSR Academy of the Sciences, asking tovisit Eckert's Lab. Jan Schilt, now in charge ofthe Lab, forwards it to Eckert in Washington. In August 1940, I.S. Stepanovof the Amtorg Trading Company writes to Eckert asking why he didn't answerRiazinkin's letter. Here's the final paragraph of Eckert's reply (cc'd toSchilt):

May I take the opportunity to state that one of your eminent scientists, thelate Dr. Numerov, corresponded with me several years ago concerning this veryproblem [machine construction of astronomical tables for navigation].It was his intention to secure a similar installation, and had one inoperation. I sincerely hope that his interest in my machines was notconstrued by his government as treason, and that Mr. Riazankin will not meetthe same fate as Dr. Numerov. [88].

Schilt writes to Eckert from Columbia on August 9th:

Concerning the letter of Mr. Stepanov I am shivering a little bit. Your replyto him is extremely strong and clear, so much so that I would not be surprisedif I wouldn't hear from them at all, and frankly I just soon would not . ifthere is any danger that [the machine] room may prove a death trap to Russianscientists I think I am in favor of not talking to these people. [88].

(Note: the correspondence places Numerov's death prior to 1941.) According toDavid Alan Grier [46], the Amtorg Trading Company was aspy agency; the proposed visit from Riazinkin, which never actually tookplace, is thought to have been an attemptedfirst case of computer espionage [45]. Infact, Amtorg was not just a front; it handled the bulk of Soviet-Americantrade for many years, but it was also an ideal spot for the placement ofspies. Was Riazankin a spy? We'll never know. In any case he was neverheard from again.

Herb Grosch reports that Sovietastronomers continued to pay occasional visits to Watson Lab after the War,e.g. in connection with taking over production of the annualKleinePlaneten listing of asteroid positions from Watson Lab, which did the work in 1946 after the GermanAstronomischesRechen-Institut was destroyed in the War.

Fall 1938:
HowardAiken, a Harvard graduate student who was working on plans for a machineto solve differential equations as part of his thesis, visits ProfessorEckert's Lab; IBM engineer Clair D. Lake (who built Eckert'sswitch box) is also present. Eckert demonstratesthe capabilities of his setup and suggests that he try to interest IBM inthe project [9]. A year later IBM agreed todevelop and construct the machine, an electro-mechanical device called theAutomatic Sequence Controlled Calculator, ASCC(PHOTO), the first automated general-purpose (butnot electronic or stored-program) computer. The ASCC was built by Lake andhis staff at IBM's Endicott NY facility and presented in 1944 to Harvard,where it did war work, and eventually became known as the HarvardMark 1 [9]. The Mark 1 was soonoutpaced by IBM's Aberdeen Relay Calculator(also built by Lake) and later the US Army's ENIAC,the first electronic automatic general-purpose (but still notstored-program) computer.
Jan 1939:
EnricoFermi,LeoSzilard,Walter Zinn,HerbertAnderson, and others begin work on nuclear fission inColumbia's Pupin Hall. Within a few months this workwould become the Manhattan Project, funded by President Roosevelt (Columbia Law, 1905-07) in response toAlbert Einstein'sletter warning of Nazi research in this area. After Pearl Harbor, theproject moved to the University of Chicago (supposedly to make it lessvulnerable to German attack) and spread to the University of California,Los Alamos, Oak Ridge, Hanford, andother locations. Fermi's lab was in the same building as Professor Eckert'sAstronomical Computing Bureau.I don't know to what degree, if any, Eckert'scomputing machines were employed in the early Manhattan Project, but as noted below they played a key role in 1945 in thefinal preparations for the first A-bombs [57]. Anumber of other Columbia scientists worked on the project, including I.I.Rabi, EdwardTeller,John Dunning(who identified U-235 as the fissionable uranium isotope using the Pupincyclotron in Feb 1940),HaroldUrey (who later left the project on moral grounds), andGeorge Pegram(who assembled the original Manhattan Project team), as well as juniorfaculty who would later become well-known physicists, such asC.S.Wu and Bill Havens(both of whom I worked for in my student days),James Rainwater, Eugene Booth, and Richard Present.The following is taken from a narrative,Evolving from Calculators to Computerson theLos AlamosNational Laboratory History website (May 2003):Calculations at Los Alamos were originally done on manually operatedmechanical calculators, which was not only laborious and time-consuming,but the machines broke down frequently under heavy use. The onlyone who could fix them promptly was RichardFeynman (Nobel Prize in Physics, 1965), which some thought was not thebest use of his time. 'Dana Mitchell, whom Laboratory Director J. RobertOppenheimer had recruited from Columbia University to oversee procurement forLos Alamos, recognized that the calculators were not adequate for the heavycomputational chores and suggested the use of IBM punched-card machines. Hehad seen them used successfully by Wallace Eckert at Columbia to calculate theorbits of planets and persuaded [Stanley] Frankel and [Eldred] Nelson to ordera complement of them.

'The new IBM punched-card machines were devoted to calculations to simulateimplosion, and Metropolis and Feynman organized a race between them and thehand-computing group. 'We set up a room with girls in it. Each one had aMarchant. Butone was the multiplier, and another was the adder, and this one cubed, and allshe did was cube this number and send it to the next one,' said Feynmann. Forone day, the hand computers kept up: 'The only difference was that the IBMmachines didn't get tired and could work three shifts. But the girls got tiredafter a while.'

May 1939:
Columbia University's Baker Field (at 215th Street in upper Manhattan)was the site of thenation'sfirst televised sports event, a baseball game between Columbiaand Princeton universities, May 17, 1939, broadcast by NBC. (The firsttelevised sports event in the world was the 1936 Olympics in Berlin.)
[ Top ]
[ Early ][ 1920 ][ 1930 ][ 1940 ][ 1950 ][ 1960 ][ 1970 ][ 1980 ][ 1990 ][ 2000 ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]
1940:
Prof. Eckert publishes Punched Card Methods inScientific Calculation [50], the firstcomputer book. The book '.covers nearly a decade of work by W.J. Eckerton astronomical calculations by machine processes. Based on firsthandexperience, it describes a gamut of large calculations that could best becarried out by machines able to process numbers in machine-readable form.These calculations include the construction of mathematical tables, thenumerical integration of differential equations, numerical harmonic analysisand synthesis, and the solution of simultaneous equations. . Often knownas the 'Orange Book' on account of the vividly colored covers of its originalprinting, Eckert's book was the bible of many workers engaged in punched cardcomputing at the IBM Watson Scientific Computing Laboratory at ColumbiaUniversity and elsewhere. . The process of carrying out the integration ofthe differential equations is explained in detail. It involves the use of themultiplier, tabulator, and summary punch in concert, guided by the setting ofa calculation control switch, which acts as a master controller advancingautomatically . through twelve positions(Figure 2). This control switch . was a precursorof sequential control in electroniccomputers' [78].'Some of the better-known builders of the early computers, like Vannevar Bushat MIT, J. Presper Eckert of the ENIAC, and Howard Aiken at Harvard, got their first introductionin the famous orange book' [90]. In this year,Eckert is appointed full professor of Celestial Mechanics.
March 1940:
Eckert leaves Columbia for an assignment with theUS Naval Observatory,which he rapidly 'computerizes' to create accurate air and sea navigationtables for the US Air Corps and Navy using the techniques he devised atColumbia [17], which allowed design and productionof theAir Almanac in record time (the first issue ofthe Air Almanac appeared December 1st, 1940, produced entirely by machinemethods). The Astronomical Computing Bureau in Pupin, nowdirected byJanSchilt (but with Eckert still running the show from Washington), wasassigned to tasks for the looming war, such as ballistic firing tables, andtrajectory calculations, and later, design calculations for theB-29sighting station [57,59] —'Mathematics Goes to War' [9]. Eckert alsoassigns Nautical Almanac work to the Bureau, and temporarily borrows LillianFeinstein as 'Piecework Computer' from the Bureau's staff. The Bureauexisted until 1951, but by 1948 most of its work had migrated to Watson Lab [88].
IBM played a large partin the Allied war effort, supplying all of its products to the US governmentat 1% over cost, and taking on new jobs as well, including manufacture ofnearly six percent of all M1 rifles [seepictures and story] [another one here][orsearch Google](other non-weapons companies made M1s too, including National Postal MeterCompany, General Motors, Underwood [typewriters], and Rock-Ola, a maker ofjuke boxes). IBM also evacuated the families of employees in England toToronto [85] and assisted the families of USemployees who had gone off to war and held jobs open for all its returningveterans [57].According to allegations in 2001 [48] (havingnothing to do with Columbia), IBM might also have played a part inGermany's war effort, in which widespread use was made of punched-cardtechnology manufactured by IBM's German subsidiary, Dehomag[120], which had beentaken over by the Nazi government in 1940. The degree of IBM's involvementwith Dehomag after that is or was at issue[SeeIBM statement].
1940:
The Bureau of Radio Research (founded at Princeton University in 1937),headed by Paul Lazarsfeld, moves to Columbia University, with quarters at 15Amsterdam Avenue. In 1949 it would move to 427 West 117th Street, and about1953 to 605 West 115th Street, the other half of the former Parnassus Club, across from the present Watson Laboratory. Its name would change tothe Bureau of Applied Social Research (BASR) in 1944, and it would liveon until 1977, when it was replaced by the Center for Social Sciences (later,the Lazarsfeld Center for Social Sciences, and still later theInstitute forSocial and Economic Theory and Research). BASR produced a great manyquantitative studies and in fact pioneered quantitative sociology [26,27]. From its inception in1940, the Bureau was in possession of IBM tabulatingequipment. 'IBM machines' and 'tabulating charges' as well as IBMsupplies appear on each annual budget [28]). TheBASR's 1954-56 budgets show $6000 per month for IBM equipment rental, whichsuggests a rather massive capacity (compare with the Registrar Proposal of 1957). The BASR Report onthe Year 1957-58 says 'The Bureau also maintains its own IBM dataprocessing laboratory in University Hall, and other IBM equipment for use bystudents in Fayerweather Hall. The machine facilities of the WatsonScientific Computing Laboratory are available for certain highly technicalproblems not readily solved by the Bureau's own equipment' [28]. Pnina Stern, who worked at the Bureau until itsdemise, says 'When I got there in 1966 BASR had [at 605 W 115th Street] IBM 024 card punches, an 085Collator, an 082 Sorter, and a 403 Accounting Machine that could be wired to producecross tabulations and other good stuff. Fred Meier was a whiz at wiring upthis machine. You had to wire it for each thing you wanted to do. It printedout cross tabulations and maybe even some other statistics. Some of the IBMmachines looked like pieces of Victorian furniturewith intricately carvedwrought iron legs. Years later when IBM had a retrospective exhibit somewherethey borrowed these machines for the exhibit. Maybe Fred M. owned them atthat time. As for computing, someone at Columbia -- possibly at BASR -- wrotethe very first computer cross tabulation program. I believe it was written inIBM 7090 machine language and you had to give it numerical coded instructions.It was not very user friendly. I think it may have been written by PeterGraham.' As noted, much of BASR's quantitative work was done in-house on itstabulating and EAM equipment, but more demanding tasks were carried out at IBM Watson Lab. By 1961, BASR was (with Physics andChemistry) one of Columbia's leading users of computing, and one of thereasons the Columbia Computer Center was created [29]. After 1963, BASR was a major user of the ComputerCenter mainframes, sending work-study students with massive decks of cards tothe SSIO Area on campus on a regular basis to run jobs.'We always duplicated the cards before we sent them over because we hadvisions of the students dropping the IBM card boxes and the cards floatingacross Broadway.' In the 1970s, HP terminals wereinstalled for interactive access to mainframe applications like SAS and SPSS.The Directors of BASR were Paul Lazarsfeld (1940-1951), Charles Glock(1951-1957), David Sills (1957-1960), Bernard Berelson (1960-61), and AllenBarton (1962-1977).
20 December 1944:
Since the 1930s, Columbia had been IBM's main contact with scientificcomputing and the academic community [38], and to carryforward this relationship, Thomas J Watson,a Columbia Trustee since 1933, wrote to Columbia Provost (and Acting President1945-47) Frank Diehl Fackenthal [28] agreeing toestablish a computing research laboratory at Columbia University as soon asspace can be secured: 'I am confident that this laboratory will be anothermajor forward step in the long and productive cooperation between the[sic] IBM and Columbia University.'
1945:
The US Naval Observatory produces the 1946 edition of theAir Almanac in what is arguably thefirst instance of 'computer'-driven typesetting, using the newly deliveredprogrammable card-driven table printer thathad been specified by Professor Eckert in 1941, but whose production wasdelayed by the War.
6 February 1945:
'To give all possible aid to the war effort and to promote peace throughscientific development, a computing laboratory has been established atColumbia University by International Business Machines Corporation. The newlaboratory, to be known as the Thomas J. Watson Scientific ComputingLaboratory at Columbia University, will serve as a world center for thetreatment of problems in the various fields of science, whose solution dependson the effective use of applied mathematics and mechanicalcalculations' [23].Columbia Professor Wallace J. Eckert, now head ofIBM's new Pure Research Department, is appointed to head the laboratory.Temporarily housed on the tenth floor of Pupin Hall, staffed and paid for byIBM, with the staff holding faculty appointments and teaching credit coursesin math, physics, astronomy, and other fields. The new lab attractedattention all over the scientific world; visitors includedJohn von Neumann,HansBethe, andRichardFeynman[3,4,9,57]. The lab was named for IBM's Thomas J. Watson(Senior), a Columbia Trustee (it is said that Watson is the one who nominatedEisenhower as Columbia President in 1948, but he meantMilton! [17]).Within a year, Watson Lab would become the third most powerful computingfacility in the world, after the US Army's Aberdeen Proving Ground andHarvard University, and would remain so for some years.
Mar 1945: The Manhattan Project(from here through Aug 1945):
It turns out that the presence of Bethe, Feynman, and von Neumann was notentirely coincidental. Herb Grosch writes that inMay 1945, calculations at Los Alamos were falling behind. As Dr. Eckert (whohad just hired him to work at the new Watson Lab) explained, 'They came to IBMfor help. Mr. Watson and John McPherson[IBM engineering director]. thought immediately of theAstronomical Bureau at Columbia, but it isheavily engaged in fairly high priority work for another part of the Army*, andreally has no room for physical expansion anyhow. It has only two 601s and an old 285 fixed-plugboardtabulator, and there is hardly any room to move.' New space was needed,and found, for Watson Lab's first task: solution of temperature-pressureequations for completion of the A-bombsat Los Alamos [57] (more about thisHERE and much more inChapter 03 of Dr. Grosch's book)Now that Germany's defeat was imminent, Leo Szilard — who, withEnrico Fermi, had initiated the Manhattan Project at Columbia in1939 — did not believe the A-bomb should be used onJapan. He obtained a letter of introduction to President Roosevelt from Albert Einstein so he could present his case against droppingthe bomb. A preliminary meeting with Eleanor Roosevelt was set up for May8th, but the President died on April 12th and Szilard was blocked fromcontacting President Truman.
________________________________
* The Army work referred to was for the Army Air Force: test data reductionfor a GE aerial fire control system that later went into production for theB-29bomber [57].
8 May 1945:
VE Day, Germany surrenders, the war in Europe ends.
Jul 1945:
Szilard wrote and circulated a petition among hisfellow scientists at the University of Chicago against the use of atomicweapons and asking President Truman not to use them on Japan. He also sentcopies to Oak Ridge and Los Alamos for circulation (the Los Alamos copy wasburied by Groves and Oppenheimer). Szilard's petition went through severaldrafts; the first one (July 3rd) included the following text:
Atomic bombs are primarily a means for the ruthlessannihilation of cities. Once they were introduced as an instrument of war itwould be difficult to resist for long the temptation of putting them to suchuse. The last few years show a marked tendency toward increasingruthlessness. At present our Air Forces, striking at the Japanese cities, areusing the same methods of warfare which were condemned by American publicopinion only a few years ago when applied by the Germans to the cities ofEngland. Our use of atomic bombs in this war would carry the world a long wayfurther on this path of ruthlessness.

Subsequent drafts were toned down a bit but made the same recommendations.The Oak Ridgepetition urged that 'before this weapon be used without restriction in thepresent conflict, its powers should be adequately described and demonstrated,and the Japanese nation should be given the opportunity to consider theconsequences of further refusal to surrender'. Watson Lab staff who wereperforming calculations for Los Alamos were unaware of the petitions or,indeed (with only two exceptions, Eckert and Grosch, the only ones withsecurity clearances), that the calculations were for abomb [59]. In any event, the petitions neverreached the President.

6 Aug 1945:
Hiroshima: 'Now we knew what we had been workingon' [57]. A second A-bomb was dropped onNagasaki August 9th. More than 200,000 people died from the two blasts.Was the atomic bomb needed to end the war with Japan? The US StrategicBombing Survey [94]says, 'Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts andsupported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it isthe Survey's opinion that certainly prior to 31 December 1945, and inall probability prior to 1 November 1945 [the earliest possible datefor an invasion], Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs hadnot been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war in the East, andeven if no invasion had been planned or contemplated.'It was known by the Allies [95] thatsince May 1945, Japan had been making peace overtures to the Soviet Union,both in Tokyo and Moscow. This was done at the direction of the Emperor,who had told his envoy, Prince Konoye, to 'secure peace at any price,notwithstanding its severity' [93]. Allindications (e.g. in HenryL. Stimson's diaries*) are that the US deliberately prolonged the war,first by delaying the Potsdam Conference and then by striking the 'Emperorcan stay' clause from the Potsdam Declaration, until the bombs could bedropped, and that this was done to intimidate the Soviet Union.

Former President, Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in Europe, andSupreme Commander of NATO Dwight D. Eisenhower wrote in his memoir,Mandatefor Change, (Doubleday 1963), “The incident took place in 1945when Secretary of War Stimson visiting my headquarters in Germany, informedme that our government was preparing to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. I wasone of those who felt that there were a number of cogent reasons to questionthe wisdom of such an act . . . But the Secretary, upon giving me the newsof the successful bomb test in New Mexico, and of the plan for using it,asked for my reaction, apparently expecting a vigorous assent. During hisrecitation of the relevant facts, I had been conscious of a feeling ofdepression and so I voiced to him my grave misgivings, first on the basis ofmy belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb wascompletely unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our countryshould avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employmentwas, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. Itwas my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way tosurrender with a minimum loss of 'face'.”

FDR's and Truman's Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and of the CombinedUS and British Chiefs of Staff Admiral William D. Leahy wrote in hisbook I WasThere (Whittlesey House, 1950),“It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshimaand Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. TheJapanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of theeffective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventionalweapons.”

_____________________________
* Note: The link to the Stimson diaries seems to go stale from time totime, and the selection of entries seems to change; as of mid-August 2005,some independent copies can be foundHEREandHERE. For further detail and analysis see:'Hiroshima: HistoriansReassess' by Gar Alperovitz, Foreign Policy (Summer 1995)No. 99: 15-34, esp. Part 4,'The Preferred Option.'
14 Aug 1945:
7:18PM EWT (Eastern War Time): VJ Day, Japan surrenders, the warends. The formal surrender was signed September 2. (The USand many other countries were on permanent daylight savings time throughoutthe war; in the US this was called War Time -- Eastern War Time, Central WarTime, etc.)
Oct 1945:
Watson Laboratory establishes itself as the cataloger of mathematicaltables on punched cards, meaning that any scientist who needed to obtainmachine-readable tables of mathematical functions such as sin, cos, tan, log,squares, cubes, inverses, roots, Bessel functions, Lagrangean interpolationcoefficients, spheroid functions, grid coordinates, and so forth, could findout from Watson Lab where to get them [28].Of course Watson Lab itself was a major producer of such tables. As thesecard decks were freely shared, they might be regarded as an early formof freeware.
Nov 1945:
Watson Laboratory moves from Pupin Hall (where it had been sinceFebruary 1945) into 612 West 116thStreet (PHOTO) (MAP), a former fraternityhouse vacated by the War, purchased by IBM and renovated as a laboratory (PHOTOS) with offices and teaching facility [4,9]. A 'simple bronze plaque'was affixed to the building reading 'WATSON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING LABORATORYat COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY' [28] (WHERE IS THEPLAQUE NOW?). Watson Lab's early equipment included two experimentalone-of-a-kind relay calculators, two Aberdeen relaycalculators, plus conventional calculators and tabulators inherited from the Astronomy Lab, andwithin a couple years would grow to include a IBM 602and the first IBM 604. Read more about renovationand equipping of this building in Chapter09 of the Grosch book. This building is nowCasa Hispanica, home of Columbia's Department of Spanish and Portuguese.Herb Grosch confirms that Chock Full O' Nuts was open for business on thesouthwest corner of 116th and Broadway in 1945, where it remained a fixturefor decades.
Chock Full O' Nuts sightings go back as far as1944. When did it close? Mid-1980s I think. A few other establishments that werehere in 1945 are still open in 2004: The West End (1915),Tom's Restaurant (1936), Columbia Hardware (1939), andMondel's Chocolates (1943).
1945-59
Watson Lab Photo Gallery from Eric Hankam.
Aug 1946:
Eckert describes Watson Lab to an IBM Research Forum [89]. 'It is the intention of the Laboratory to make thesefacilities available to any scientist from any place in this country orabroad, regardless of whether he is connected with a university or alaboratory. This is our fundamental principle: problems will be acceptedbecause of scientific interest and not for any other considerations.Scientific interest can be of two kinds: the problem may interest us because ofthe complexity of the calculation, or it may be considered on the basis ofscientific merit of the result rather than the means. While routinecomputation is not the aim of the Laboratory, a considerable amount of it willbe done on worthy causes.'

Later he describes some experimental machines: 'Among the digital machineswhich have been developed over the years, there are several based on the relaynetwork; we now have two of these at the Laboratory [note: he is notreferring to the Aberdeens, which had not yet beendelivered] . The first one was developed with the idea of seeing howfew relays it is possible to use to produce a calculating machine. Thismachine is built on the standard IBM key punch. . The control is veryconvenient. a combination of control panel and master card or program card.Thus, instead of having twenty control panels for a complicated job, you canset it up to use one control panel and twenty master cards.'

This might very well be the birth of software. The controlpanel, which stays in place for the duration of the job, defines the'instructions' of the machine, in a sense its 'microprogram'. The sequenceof operations (invoking instructions from the control panel) is on a deckof cards. It is a PROGRAM. A few years later, IBM would build aCard Programmed Calculator, and from there it isa short step to the first general-purpose stored-program computer, which,arguably, was IBM's SSEC, built under Eckert'sdirection (in fact the SSEC was completed before the CPC).

The significance of card programming can't be overstated. A deck ofcontrol cards (along with the specifications for the correspondingcontrol-panel wiring, at least in these early days) documents the program. Itcan be printed, read, modified, duplicated, mailed, kept for future use, andrun again on different data sets. Much of this might be said of plugboardstoo, provided you don't have to recycle them, thus destroying the program.But most important, a program deck can be any length at all, thus allowingextremely complex problems to be run -- problems that might have required athousand plugboards. (Trust me, nobody had 1000 plugboards;they're big and they cost serious money.)

1946:
Watson Lab produces Ephemerides of 783Minor Planets for 1947 (formerly Kleine Planeten),the annual asteroid listing for the year 1947, about 100 pages of tablesshowing the position of each body at 8-day intervals, calculated onthe Watson Lab Aberdeen Relay Calculators, theworld's fastest computing devices at the time.
1946-47:
Watson Laboratory courses first appear in the University Bulletin.These are graduate-level credit courses. Among them are courses incomputing machinery and numerical analysis taught byWallace Eckert and HerbGrosch believed to be the first computer science courses offered byany university [40] or, more precisely, 'thefirst such courses in the world fully integrated into a universitycurriculum and continuing year after year' [59].Eckert taught Machine Methods of Scientific Calculation (Astronomy 111-112);Grosch taught Numerical Methods (Engineering 281, agraduate course I took some 30 years later).The next year L.H. Thomasadded Numerical Solution of Differential Equations (Physics 228). By 1951,the curriculum also included EE 275 (Electrical and ElectronicComponents of Digital Computers, taught by Watson Lab's Robert M. Walker)and Physics 255 (Separation of Variables in Mathematical Physics,L.H. Thomas). Most of these courses included hands-on laboratory sessionswith the Watson Lab machines or (later) theSSEC downtown.

Graduate-level hard-science courses used the Watson Lab machines too,including some taught by regular Columbia faculty such asGeorgeKimball (Chemistry), among whose students wereMargaret Oakley Dayhoff(Columbia Ph.D. 1948, the founder of computational biochemistry),Isaac Asimov(Columbia B.Sc 1939, M.A. 1941, Ph.D. 1948), andMauriceEwing (Oceanography), the founder ofLamont-Doherty EarthObservatory, whose students includedFrank Press (ColumbiaM.A. 1946, Ph.D. 1949), who went on to become President ofthe US National Academy of Sciences and Chairman of the National ResearchCouncil. More about these courses in the 1951 entry.

1946-47:
It was also during this period that Watson Laboratory began to providecomputer time to Columbia researchers at no charge. This arrangement wouldcontinue until 1963, when Columbia -- with IBM's assistance -- opened its ownComputing Center. Perhaps the first non-Watson-Lab Columbia researcher to usethe Watson Lab machines wasMartinSchwarzschild, who used the Aberdeen RelayCalculators for astronomicalcalculations [57].
1947:
NevisLaboratory, the Columbia Physics department's primary center for study ofhigh-energy and nuclear physics, founded in Irvington, New York. There is along history of computing here too, which needs to be told, including the manyand varied connection methods to Columbia's Morningside Heights campus.
Sep 1947:
The Association for ComputingMachinery (ACM) is born at a meeting of sixty computer enthusiasts atColumbia University's Havemeyer Hall [57].Originally calling itself the Eastern Association for Computing Machinery,attendees of its first meeting included Columbia Professor Wallace Eckert (who arranged the space), ProfessorHilleth Thomas (Thomas-Fermi Model), Byron Havensof Watson Lab (chief engineer, NORC), John Lentz ofWatson Lab (designer of the first 'personal computer'),Watson Lab's Herb Grosch,and 'everybody's favorite computer person',Grace Hopper. The meeting was convened by computer pioneer and antiwar activistEdmundBerkeley. (CLICK HERE to view documents from thefirst ACM meeting.)
Nov 1947:
The 'Watson Laboratory Three-Week Course on Computing', taught byEric Hankam, the first hands-on computer course (PHOTOS AND DETAILS), in which scientists from allover the world learned how to apply computing machines to problems in theirdisciplines. The course was given here eleven times a year until 1957 -- bywhich time it had been attended by 1600 people from 20 countries -- when itwas moved to IBM education centers around the world [9].
24 Dec 1947:
First successful test of the transistor.
Jan 1948:
The IBM Selective Sequence Electronic Calculator (SSEC) (PHOTOS AND DETAILS) was designed and built by IBM in1946-47 under the direction of Columbia Professsor Wallace Eckert and theninstalled in IBM HQ at 590 Madison Ave in January 1948. This is one of thefirst large-scale electronic computers, and the first machine to combineelectronic computation with a stored program and capable of operating on itsown instructions as data. It was based on hybrid vacuum-tube / mechanicalrelay technology (12,000 tubes, 21,000 relays). Fully assembled, it was 140feet long (60 + 20 + 60 U-shape) (some sources cite different dimensions) andwas used initially for calculating lunar coordinates. Reporters called it aRobot Brain. Its massive size and configuration established the publicimage of computers for decades to come (as in this 1961 New Yorkercover by Charles Addams).Aside from solving important scientific problems, it was usedby students of Columbia's pioneeringMachineMethods graduate course -- part of the world's first computer sciencecurriculum, initiated here in 1946.
Popular descriptions of computers as 'brains' and analogies with the humannervous system were so rampant in the late 1940s and early 50s, that George Stibitz,developer of the wartimeBell RelayCalculators, was prompted to write an article cautioning against such wildtales as the one in the Feb 18, 1950, Saturday Evening Post, whichsaid that computers were subject to psychopathic states which engineers cureby 'shock treatments' consisting of the application of excessively largevoltages [79].

The SSEC was programmed from Watson Lab on standard IBM cards converted toinput tapes on a special punch called the Prancing Stallion [57]. Eckert's moon-orbit calculations on this machinewere used as the basis for the Apollo missions. It was dismantled in 1952.One of the SSEC's programmers wasJohn Backus (PHOTO AND DETAILS), who had twoColumbia degrees and was at Watson Lab in1950-52 [9], and who went on to design FORTRAN,the first high-level machine-independent programming language, andAlgol,the first block-structured language, and is also known forBackus Normal Form (BNF), a meta-language for describing computerlanguages. Faulty driver on kernel stack. Before FORTRAN, almost every computer program was written inmachine or assembly language, and therefore was not portable to any other kindof machine.

The idea of a high-level programming language was the second step on the roadto user friendliness. The first step was the assembler. Such notionswere not without controversy. John von Neumann, when he first heard aboutFORTRAN in 1954, was unimpressed and asked 'why would you want more thanmachine language?' One of von Neumann's students at Princeton recalled thatgraduate students were being used to hand assemble programs into binary fortheir early machine. This student took time out to build an assembler, butwhen von Neumann found out about it he was very angry, saying that it was awaste of a valuable scientific computing instrument to use it to do clericalwork. (These anecdotes from a biographical sketch of von Neumann by John A.N. Lee, Dept of ComputerScience, Virginia Polytechnical Institute.)

Another SSEC programmer wasEdgarF. Codd, originator of the relational database model[40] (Communications of the ACM, Vol. 13,No. 6, June 1970, pp.377-387), who was at Watson Lab from 1949 to 1952[9] and diedApril18, 2003.

1948-54:
The IBM Personal Automatic Calculator was designed by John Lentzand built between 1948 and 1954 on the top floor ofWatson Lab. Among its innovations was a magneticdrum for auxilliary storage, automatic positioning of the decimal point,and the first video terminal. When it was finallyannounced in 1956 as the IBM 610 Autopoint Computer,it was the first 'personal computer'. [4,9,17]
1949:
Lamont-DohertyGeological Observatory, Columbia's earth science facility, founded inPalisades, New York, by Professor Maurice Ewing, a user of the Watson Labequipment. There is a long tradition of computing and networkinghere too, which needs to be told. See [39] for anexcellent history (albeit with nothing on computing) of what is now called theLamont Doherty Earth Observatory.

[ Top ]

[ Early ][ 1920 ][ 1930 ][ 1940 ][ 1950 ][ 1960 ][ 1970 ][ 1980 ][ 1990 ][ 2000 ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]
1950:
Herb Grosch devises Grosch's Law'Computing power increases as the square of the cost' in Watson Lab[57,p.131].Dr. Grosch leaves Watson in 1951 to start an IBM bureau in Washington DC.
May 1950:
EdmundBerkeley (who had founded the ACM at Columbia University in 1947, andwho had written the first book about computers for a general audience[62] in 1949), WilliamPorter (a West Medford MA mechanic), and two Columbia graduate students,Robert Jensen and Andrew Vall, buildSimon [63], a simple 'model electronic brain'(PHOTO), costing about $600 to construct. Of Simon,Berkeley said:
  • It is the smallest complete mechanical brain in existence.
  • It knows not more than four numbers; it can express onlythe number 0, 1, 2 and 3.
  • It is 'guaranteed to make every member of an audience feelsuperior to it.'
  • It is a mechanical brain that has cost less than $1,000.
  • It can be carried around in one hand (and the power supplyin the other hand).
  • It can be completely understood by one man.
  • It is an excellent device for teaching, lecturing and explaining.
1951:
CLICK HERE to view some 1951 Watson LabAstronomy, Engineering, and Physics course listings from the 1951 ColumbiaCatalog. Herb Groschrecalls [57]:'. a little about the courses we gave - that is, at Columbia. These wereall part of the regular university curriculum, listed in the appropriatecatalogs - we had our own special one also - and open to any student with theprerequisites and the money. We did however encourage our own juniors on116th Street and at the SSEC to attend as auditors if they did not want tosign up for credit. . Most of our offerings were unusual. [Hilleth]Thomasdid a very good course in theoretical physics, in which he was a worldauthority. I did a celestial mechanics course one year; it was really amélange of spherical trig, practical and theoretical astronomy (meaningtime and position determination, and orbit computing), and brief mentions ofplanetary and satellite mechanics. . None of my subtopics were taughtanywhere else at Columbia; the astronomy department was solid astrophysics.And they were what was needed for astronomy calculations. . Most of ourvalue as teachers, however, came from the computing courses. Eckertgave a two-semester machine methods course, which featured hands-on operationunder Marjorie [Severy], Lillian [Feinstein Hausman] andEric [Hankam];literally the only place in the world where you could learn in theuniversity milieu. . I did numerical methods - classical interpolationand matrix arithmetic and integration of differential equations. Most of myexamples, and assigned exercises, were at desk calculator level, but Ilectured from the point of view of machine operation . This was onesemester, once a year, and Hilleth did an advanced course featuring partialdifferential equation solutions and error propagation, every other year. .My classes were small; this was a very esoteric discipline indeed in theForties. But I had interesting students . like [Stan] Rothman and [Bill]McClelland and [John] Backus and Don Quarles. . Soit was my side of the house that carried the teaching. It went on into theFifties, always as part - but a small part - of the Columbia offerings. Thehands-on side of the Machine Methods course was unique, not just because ofthe equipment but because real use-'em-every-day men and women were runningit.'
1952-3:
Watson Lab #2.When construction of the NORC (see Dec 1954 entry)exhausted available space in the petite 116th street building (and becausestill more space was required by Watson Lab's new physics program), IBMpurchased the building at 612 West 115th Street(PHOTO)(MAP), formerly a 'women'sresidence club', gutted and renovated it, equipped it with physicslaboratories, and relocated to it.The new Watson Lab was occupied in September 1953. A time clock wasinstalled (you can still see its mounting today)but nobody on the professional staff used it (as a corporation, IBM wasobsessed with efficiency but the Watson Lab scientists were notoriousnoncomformists). The time clock and all wall clocks were controlled centrallyand set automatically by an IBM master clock (like theone in the first Watson Lab); the IBM wall clocks in Watson Lab kept onticking until about 1999. The Penthouse was outfitted as a lunchroom with asmall kitchen, where coffee and tea could be made and soup or beans heated up;it had the atmosphere of a World War II canteen, and was the favorite placefor people in different groups or floors to talk and thesis advisors to meetwith their students [17].

Some space was retained in the 116th Street building: offices for PhD students, classroom space,and a machine room [4,9,17,66].

The former women's residence on 115th Street was in fact theParnassus Club,a boarding house for young women -- students at theJulliard School of Music, which was thenonly a couple blocks away on the currentManhattan School of Music site(MAP)or at Barnard College, a block north(MAP),for semi-professional performers. It operated from 1921 to 1955.CLICK HERE for stories and photos.

The North-facing building was gutted by IBM in 1953 to create WatsonLaboratory. According to a resident, 'we all had to move out because someofficial body at Columbia had decided the neighborhood had become toodangerous for us; at least that was the reason given in a letter we allreceived that spring' (this refers to the second Parnassus Clubbuilding, which remained in operation until 1955). (Miss Macmillan's 1965obituary states, however, that the Club was closed due to her poor health.)The exterior of 612 West 115th Street retains itsoriginal look but the inside contains no trace of the Parnassus Club. InJuly 2003, a resident from 1950 appeared on the doorstep with her daughterand grandson; she was showing them where she used live. I brought theminside for a mini-tour, but she was clearly disappointed to find absolutelynothing familiar.

The original Watson Lab at 612 West 116th Street was designed by Thomas Nashand built in 1906 as the Delta Phi fraternity house. The current Watsonbuilding at 612 West 115th Street was originally an apartment buildingcalled Duncan Hall, designed in 1905 by the prolific firm of Neville &Bagge, originally built and owned by a Frank Woytisek. The building acrossthe street, No. 605, was also an apartment building by Neville & Bagge,called the Bellemore, built in 1903 and originally owned by Moses Crystal[12]. It was home to the Bureau of Applied SocialResearch (BASR) from 1955(?) until it was demolishedabout 1970.

1953:
The IBM 650 announced.This was the world's first mass-produced computer and eventually Columbiahad several of them [see IBM page].
1954:

200th anniversary of Columbia University.
1954:
Invention of the cursor:As part of his work on the first 'personal computer' (theIBM 610), Watson Lab's John Lentz designs asmall video terminal -- keyboard and tiny screen -- for control and data entry.in which the 'current position' was indicated visually by what came to beknown as a cursor. Lentz applied for a patent on this concept; thepatent was finally granted in the early 1970s.
Dec 1954:
The Naval Ordnance Research Calculator (NORC) (PHOTOS AND DETAILS), the first supercomputer andthe most powerful computer in existence at the time (and for the next tenyears), becomes operational. It was designed here beginning in 1950 andbuilt in Watson Lab #2, 612 West 115th Street.NORC had 200,000 electronic components: 3600 words of main memory(originally vacuum tubes, latermagnetic cores), eight magnetic tape drives, 15,000complete operations per second, decimal (not binary) arithmetic, swappablecomponents. Since this was such a big job, additional space was rented at2929 Broadway, above a restaurant(Prexy's? Home of the Educated Hamburger?) for building some of theparts, which were brought to Watson Lab for assembly and eventual startup andoperation. John von Neumann was a team member and gave theinaugural address onDecember 2, 1954. NORC was moved to the Naval Proving Ground, Dahlgren,Virginia, in 1955 and remained operational until1968 [4,12,17].
30 Aug 1955:
The first of two IBM 650 computers is installedin the first-floor machine room of the original Watson Lab building on 116thStreet. The 650 was a vacuum-tube-logic decimal computer with 2000 words often decimal digits each plus sign [31] stored on drummemory. Each had a 511 card reader and a 403 printer. They ran for twoshifts a day, eventually supporting over 200 Columbia researchprojects [29]. A 17 Nov 1955 memo fromDr. Eckert to J.C. McPhersonstates that the 650 was installed on August 30 and 'much of the work of thecomputing group has been concerned with its incorporation into theLaboratory program of research and instruction.' The 650s were soon used ina series of intensive courses on computing, with [31]as a text; these courses later resulted in a book: Joachim Jeenel,Programming for Digital Computers, McGraw-Hill, 1959 [64]. Initally, all programming was in assembly languagepunched on cards; eventually languages such as FORTRAN were available. Thelegendary SOAP assembler for the 650 was written at Watson Lab by StanPoley.

Sode Es Informatica Mac Manual Integracion Index En

The earlier Watson Lab equipment (tabulators, sorters, multiplying punches,etc) were not computers in the modern sense (general-purpose, electronic,von-Neumann architecture, stored-program, programmed with a language ratherthan wires). NORC had been the first such computer at Columbia but, althoughit was used in one Columbia PhD dissertation [65],it was not open to the Columbia community for general use [61]. Thus the IBM 650 was the first computer availableto Columbia researchers and we have a 50th anniversary onAugust 30, 2005.

Eric Hankam points out [66] that this was not asdramatic a turning point as it might seem, since the same types of problemshad been solved on non-stored-program calculators at Columbia over thepreceding two or three decades; at the time, the 650 was seen as just anotherincremental step in calculator design. However, the 650's power, flexibility,and ease of use relative to the wire- and card-programmed machines (601,Aberdeen,602,604,CPC,607)attracted a flood of Columbia research projects. By 1961, 650s were alsoinstalled at Nevis Lab, Hudson Lab, and ERL. As demand oustripped capacity,it became increasingly clear that Columbia would need a computing facility ofits own, big enough to serve the entire university.

Sep 1956:
Watson Lab begins to award fellowships to Columbia graduatestudents [9], including Ken King, who wouldbecome the first Director of the Columbia Computer Center, and Joe Traub,who, after obtaining his Columbia PhD in 1959, and a distinguished career atBell Labs and heading the Carnegie-Mellon CS Department, would become firstChair of Columbia's Computer Science Department [9, 21] (prior to that, computerscience courses were in the Electrical Engineering department). WatsonFellows had their own offices at 612 West 116thStreet, that were 'appointed with fireplaces and leather sofas, a goodstipend, and unlimited computing time' [38].Approximately 15 percent of Columbia physics graduate students in the 1950sdid their thesis work at Watson Lab [38].
1956-70:
Watson Lab concentrates on solid state physics. This not-insignificantperiod, resulting in many publications, patents, and a Nobel Prize, isdescribed at length in [4] and[9]. (Richard L. Garwin of Watson Lab conductedexperiments with Leon Lederman of the CU Physics Department confirming thesuggestion byC.N. Yangof Princeton and T.D. Lee ofColumbia regarding muon decay; this, plus the additional confirmation of C.S. Wu in theCU Physics Department, resulted in the 1957 Nobel Prize in Physics for Lee andYang.) Also in this period, Seymour Koenig's research on low-temperaturebreakdown of germanium and its application to semiconductors; Triebwasser'sresearch on microscopic and thermodynamic properties of ferroelectric crystals;Tucker's research on semiconductors at liquid helium temperatures withapplication to biomedical instrumentation [38].
1957:
A proposal was submitted by Columbia University to the National ScienceFoundation to install an IBM 701 in WatsonLaboratory, since many of Columbia's research projects now demanded more powerthan was offered by the 650s (the sub-microsecond circuits used in the 701were designed at Watson Lab [37]). While the proposalwas under consideration the 701 was superseded by theModel 704, so the proposal waschanged to ask for a 704. $145,000 was awarded, but it turned out the704 was larger than the 701 originally proposed and would not fit in WatsonLab, so the money had to be returned unused [28] andIBM Watson Lab continued to cater to all of Columbia's academic computingneeds at its own expense. Projects that couldn't be accommodated by WatsonLab's Model 650s were allowed to use the more powerful IBM 700-series computersdowntown at IBM headquarters [36].
Oct 1957:
IBM proposes the following arrangement to Charles Hurd, UniversityRegistrar, for student statistics, course registration, permanent records,and fee accounting:
Less 20% educational discount, plus supplies of cards, coding sheets, control(plugboard) panels, trays, and brackets totalling another $1810.25. Note: thelinks for some of these items are to later (but similar) models. Requiredpersonnel are one supervisor/programmer, two machine operators, and three keypunch operators. Source: AIS archives. This arrangement characterizesthe nature of administrative data processing at the time. There is no truecomputer, only unit record equipment and tabulatingmachines capable of rudimentary statistics (sums) and report generation.According to letters of Charles Hurd, 1957-1960 [28],the funding was found from 'the expected decline in enrollment of Public Law550 [Korean War] veterans' (Veterans Readjustment Act of 1952); in hisproposal to Provost John Krout (29 Oct 1957), Hurd says 'I am sure that youare aware that IBM equipment has been used in the Registrars' Offices incolleges and universities. large and small, public and private, for many yearsand has proven to be a most valuable and efficient tool. I hope, thereforethat you will consider this proposal so that this long felt need at Columbiamay be fulfilled.' In other words, registration was still completely manualin 1957. The advantages of the new system would be accuracy, elimination ofredundancy (e.g. each student writing the same information on many differentforms, up to 23 of them) and transcription errors, and the ability to generatereports, including class lists, plus ID cards and mailing labels, not tomention 'keeping up with the Joneses', e.g. NYU, wherepunch-card registration had been in use since at least 1933.The new equipment was installed in 307 University Hall and the new systemphased in from 1959 to 1961 (with an IBM 407 installedrather than a 403 at an extra $250/month).
Computerized registration was seen by some as a step towardsdehumanization of students and turning universities into factories, a majorfactor in the rise of the Free SpeechMovement at the University of California at Berkeley, which set thestage for campus activism, protest, and rebellion throughout the 1960s,including Columbia in 1968:'There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makesyou so sick at heart, that you can't take part; and you've got to put yourbodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all theapparatus and you've got to make it stop.' According to StevenLubar of the Smithsonian Institution, this sentiment, although directedprimarily at the economy and war machinery, extended to the punched-cardequipment in the registrar's office: 'Berkeley protestors used punch cards asmetaphor, both as a symbol of the 'system'--first the registration system andthen bureaucratic systems more generally--and as a symbol of alienation. 'Iam a UC student. Please don't bend, fold, spindle or mutilate me.'
1958:
The Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music Center (CPEMC) is foundedby Professors Vladimir Ussachevsky and Otto Luening with a grant from theRockefeller Foundation. It is the first center for electroacoustic musicin the USA and has a long association with Columbia computing. Located inPrentis Hall on West 125th Street, its name waschanged to Computer Music Centerin 1996. Some tales have been collected and contributed byPeter Mauzey of Bell Labs, aColumbia graduate and former faculty member with a long association with theElectronic Music Center; CLICK HERE to read them.
Sep 1958:
The equipment of Columbia University IBM WatsonScientific Computing laboratory is listed [21] as:
Standard punched card equipment
A comprehensive selection of basic punched card machines, with manyspecial devices. The equipment includes keypunch, sorter, reproducer, andprinter.
Wired-program calculators
The group of electro-mechanical and electronic calculators include theType 602-ACalculating Punch,the Type 607 Electronic Calculating Punch,and the Card-Programmed Electronic Calculator.The 607 is an automatic electronic calculator with pluggable program controland 146-digit storage capacity, capable of performing most programs at therate of 100 cards per minute.
Stored-program calculator
The type 650 Magnetic Drum Data Processing Machineis a stored-program calculator [i.e. computer] which can store 2000 ten-digitwords, read 200 cards a minute, punch 100 cards a minute, and performapproximately 100 multiplications a second. The memory capacity can be usedinterchangeably for numerical data and operating instructions, which permitscomplete flexibility in the elaboration of instructions by the machine itself.

Plus special-purpose devices such as a card-driven lithography printer,a card-controlled astronomical photograph analyzer, as well as a machineshop and physics and chemistry laboratories, a highly specialized library,and access to the big IBM 700 series computers downtown.

Although FORTRAN -- the first high-level, machine-independent programminglanguage -- marked a great leap forward in user friendliness, and was probablyavailable for the 650 by this time, it's worth remembering how one ran aFORTRAN job in the early days. First you punched your FORTRAN program on akey punch machine, along with any data and controlcards. But since the 650 had no disk, the FORTRAN compiler was not resident.So to compile your program, you fed the FORTRAN compiler deck into the cardreader, followed by your FORTRAN source program as data. After some time, themachine would punch the resulting object deck. Then you fed the FORTRANrun-time library object deck and your program's object deck into the cardreader, followed by any data cards for your program. Your program would runand results would be punched onto yet another deck of cards. To see theresults, you would feed the result deck into another machine, such as an IBM 407, to have it printed on paper. The computer itselfhad no printer.

By the early 60s a certain division of labor had become the rule, in which'system analysts' would make a flow chart, programmers would translate it tocode, which was written by hand on'coding forms' that were givento key punch operators to be punched on cards. The coding forms and carddecks were passed on to 'verifiers' who repunched the source code to catch andcorrect any mistakes, signed off on the job, sent the deck to the operator toawait its turn at the computer. Hours later the results would be delivered tothe programmer in the form of a printout and the cycle would continue.

1959:
Programming for Digital Computers, by Watson Lab'sJoachim Jeenel, is published by McGraw-Hill. From the Preface: 'The contentsof this book were developed from material presented to courses on programmingfor stored-programming calculators held at Columbia University.Prof. W.J. Eckert, Director of the Watson Scientific Computing Laboratory atColumbia University, initiated the writing of the book and suggested the scopeof the text.' Jeenel also taught Columbia graduate courses such asAstronomy 111-112: Machine Methods of Scientific Calculation (with EricHankam).
1959:
An IBM 1620 is installed in Watson Lab tosupplement the 650s, and is used in Columbia research projects.
1959:
The Provost's office commissions a study to develop a plan for the futureof computing at Columbia. In view of the failure in 1957 to produce the spaceneeded for a state-of-the art computer that NSF was willingto pay for, the study concluded that a new computer center building wasneeded [28]. The central administration concurs andbegins to seek sources of funding. Dean Ralph S. Halford, a Chemistryprofessor, Dean of Graduate Faculties, and (perhaps most to the point) ViceProvost for Projects and Grants is in charge. Dean Halford and the UniversityCommittee on Cooperation with Watson Laboratory, which then includedProfessors Wallace Eckert (Astronomy and Watson Lab), Samuel Eilenberg(Mathematics), Richard Garwin (Physics and Watson Lab), and Polykarp Kusch(Physics, Nobel Prize 1955), plan the future Computer Center.

[ Top ]

[ Early ][ 1920 ][ 1930 ][ 1940 ][ 1950 ][ 1960 ][ 1970 ][ 1980 ][ 1990 ][ 2000 ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]
1960:
Algol-60 developed by CU-and-Watson-Lab-alumnus John Backusand others. This was to be the most influential computer language of alltime, the parent of all other block-structured languages, including (amongmany others) Java, C, C++, Pascal, PL/I, and Ada, but not including suchlovable mavericks as LISP, APL, Snobol, and Forth.
1960:
Watson Labprovides IBM650 accessto BronxHigh School of Science classes, one of the first high schools to offercomputer courses.
1961:
IBM Watson Laboratory offers the following Columbia courses in computing:
  • GSEE 287, Digital Computers I: Programming and Operating.
  • Astronomy 111-112: The use of High-Speed Digital Computers for ScientificCalculation.
  • Engineering 281:Numerical Analysis for Research Students in Science andEngineering.
  • Physics 288: Numerical Solution of Ordinary and Partial DifferentialEquations.
  • Management Games (Industrial Engineering): Market simulations.

Plus short courses in IBM 650 and Fortran programming and the ShareOperating System (SOS) [29,31].

Besides the Watson Lab courses, the Electrical Engineering Department offers:

  • EE 104: Electric Circuits IV: Digital Circuits and Computing Systems.
  • GSEE 267: Digital Systems and Automata.
  • GSEE 269: Information Theory.
  • GSEE 274: Electrical Analogue Computers.
  • GSEE 275-276: Logical Design of Digital Circuits.
  • GSEE 288-289: Digital Computers II and III: System Analysis and Synthesis.
  • EE 277-278-279: Pulse and Digital Circuits.
May 1961:
Dean Halford writes a Proposal to the National Science Foundationfor Support of a Computing Center to be Established at ColumbiaUniversity [29], and shortly afterwardsthe NSF approves $200,000 over the first two years [121]. IBM pledges $125,000 for fellowships, and another$500,000 is obtained from an anonymous donor [30] (who might have been Thomas J Watson Sr or anotherColumbia Trustee). Two IBM 7090 mainframe computers are to be acquired atan education discount, which requires Columbia to devote at least 88 hoursper month for purposes of instruction and unsponsored academic research.With funding lined up, Dean Halford proposes the new Computer Center to theUniversity Committee on Finance. The need for a Computer Center was clear.By this point, about 220 University research projects were being handled onIBM's computers in Watson Lab and the demands had long since exceeded theLab's capacity, resulting in the rental of IBM computers by the followinguniversity sites:
  • An IBM 1620at Lamont Doherty Geological Observatory.
  • An IBM 650 at the Nevis Cyclotron Laboratory.
  • An IBM 650 at Hudson Lab.
  • An IBM 650 at the Electronics Research Lab of the Engineering School.

The primary needs were in high-energy physics (then accounting about 200 hoursof IBM 650 time per month), sociology (50 hours/month), geophysics (100 hoursof IBM 709 time per month), biochemistry, andchemistry. 'A school of computer science will evolve gradually at theComputing Center, with an independent line of administration as an educationalorgan of the University'. The IBM Watson Lab courses would be taken over bythe Computing Center. Textwrangler mac manual. The initial staff was to be 15 persons covering twoshifts, including a branch librarian [29]. TheComputing Center was to serve 'those whose research is sponsored and thosewhose research is not. It has been created with the aim of serving all of theneeds of both groups without preference toward either one, with theexpectation that its cost would have to be met in substantial part by theUniversity' [36].

Sep 1961:
Informatica
The Columbia Committee on Finance approves Dean Halford's proposalto create a Computer Center, based on funding pledges from IBM and NSF[28].
1961-63:
Construction of the Computer Center building. Total cost:$800,000 [30] (PHOTOS, STORIES NEEDED).
2 Jan 1963:
Columbia University Computer Center (CUCC) opens.Dr. Kenneth M. King, who received his Columbia Ph.D. in Physics as a WatsonFellow under Prof. L.H. Thomas[17] and had managed Watson Lab's computingfacility [20], was the first Director, with a jointappointment to the faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science[V5#3]. The original location was 612 W 116thStreet (the first Watson Lab), which still housed the IBM teachingfacility as well as Casa Hispanica, but the new underground Computer Center building between Havemeyerand Uris halls was soon ready with machine rooms for equipment and offices forstaff ('more space than we'll ever need'). The Computer Center initiallyhoused the following equipment [10]:
IBM 7090 (PHOTOS AND STORIES) with 32768(32K) 36-bit words of magnetic core storage. This wasthe first commercial computer based on transistor, rather thanvacuum tube, logic (a vacuum-tube709 was originallyplanned [29],but the 7090 appeared just in time). It is in the direct line of descent fromWatson Lab's NORC. The price was $1,205,000.00 after60% IBM educational allowance, amortized over 5 years (Letter of JohnA. Krout, VP of the University, 4 Oct 1961, AcIS archives). Included:
  • Two data channels.
  • Two IBM 1301 Model 2 disks,total capacity: 9320000 36-bit words.
  • Six IBM 729VI 7-track tape drives.
  • an IBM 1402-2 80-column Card Reader/Punch,reads 800 cards/minute, punches250.
  • Two IBM 1403 chain printers, 132 cols/line, 1100lines/minute = 3 secs/page.
  • 7040 Console Typewriter.
  • 1014 Remote Inquiry Unit.
  • Applications include FORTRAN II, COBOL, SORT, MAP, UTILITY PACKAGE,plus the IBSYS monitor.
IBM 1401 with:
  • 4000 characters of memory.
  • Two 729V tape drives.
  • One 600 LPM printer.
  • Advanced Programming Package
Unit Record Equipment
  • 5 IBM 026 key punches,one of which is an express punch (on stilts so the operator has to stand up).
  • 1 IBM 407 accounting machine.
  • 1 IBM 519 Model 1 Reproducing Punch.
  • 1 IBM 085 Collator.
  • 1 IBM 082 Sorter.
  • 1 IBM 557 Alphabetic interpreter

Access to computing was batch only. Users brought decks or boxes of punch cards tothe operators and came back the next day to retrieve their cards and theresulting listings from the output bins. Jobs were paid for out of grants orfunny money. There were no user terminals and there was no user access to themachine room, which was staffed around the clock byoperators and a shift supervisor.

'During the first six months of the Center's operation, [the 7090] logged907.55 hours on 158 projects for 101 members of our academic staff. Downtimeran to thirty hours or so monthly during the first two months, as expected ina new installation, but fell to acceptable levels for the remainder of theperiod. About forty-five percent of the time used was furnished to projectssponsored by government contracts.' [36]

Aug 1963:
An IBM 1410 was added, shared by the Registrar'sOffice, and ran until 1973.
Nov 1963:
The IBM 7090 was replaced by an IBM 7094-I.
7 Apr 1964:
IBM announces the System/360.
1964-70:
IBM Watson Lab continues operation at 612 W 115th Street, concentratingnow on life sciences and medicine. Among many results from this period was improved analysis of Pap smears, andthere was an alliance with the Urban League Street Academy program,educating community kids in science.
1965:
Photo gallery of the Columbia ComputerCenter in 1965: The IBM 7094/7040 Coupled System, the Hough-Powell Device(HPD), Tape Library, Key Punch / EAM room. In 1965 the Computer Centerhad 25 employees, all housed in the Computer Center building: the director(Ken King), 8 operators, a librarian, and 15 technical people. Besides theIBM 7094/7040 system there was also an IBM 1401 and a1410 computer in the machine room, as well as the unitrecord equipment listed in the January 1963 entry.
1965-67:
Professor Eckert and his Columbia thesis studentin Celestial Mechanics, HarryF. Smith (who was also on the Watson Labtechnical staff as lab manager in the 116th Street building, helping students (often of EricHankam) debug their IBM 650 programs, assistingstudents in other ways with other computers in the building, and responsiblefor closing up the lab at 11pm each evening) refine the theory of the moon --the equations that describe and predict its motion -- to unheard-of accuracy,improving upon the calculations performed by Eckert in 1948-52 on theSSEC [78] by adding additional terms: 10,000equations in 10,000 unknowns, 100,000,000 possible coefficients. Thecalculations were programmed in assembly language by Smith, who devisedefficient methods for solving these sparse equations with so manysmall-divisor terms that were a potential source of instability, and run onthe Computer Center's IBM 7094 over a period of threeyears [65,87], resulting in220 pages of lunar position tables published in Astronomical Papers ofthe American Ephemeris, plus several papers in astronomical journals(see Eckert's bibliography). This was theculmination of Eckert's life's work. Smith is now on the Computer Sciencefaculty at University of North Carolina.
1965:(Month?)
The Administrative Data Processing Center (ADPC) was established.The newly established Computer Center was primarily for academiccomputing (in those days, research and very little instruction).Administrative computing was done independently by individual departmentssuch as the Registrar's Office and the Controller's Office. The new,separate ADPC drew programmers from the Registrar's and Conroller's officesas well as the Computer Center, including York Wong, previously the ComputerCenter programming supervisor, who became director of the new administrativegroup. The equipment (IBM 1401s andIBM 1410s) was in the Controller's office in Hogan Hallon Broadway and inPrentis Hall, 632 West 125th Street, withapplications written in AUTOCODER [20].

(The story of administrative computing prior to 1965 is still largelya mystery. Dorothy Marshall, VP for ADP, upon her retirement in 1988, wrote areminiscence in the ADP Newsletter [11],where she recalls that 'ADP actually originated in the Controller's Office,the first [administrative] department to use a punch-card system. The firstlarge system ADP acquired is still with us -- the Alumni Records and GiftInformation System (ARGIS) -- and I recallvery clearly the accusations that we were using all the tape drives and allthe system resources at the expense of the University researchers.' (This wasto be a recurring theme.) Unfortunately Dorothy did not mention dates orplaces.)

(Coincidentally, some clue was provided on the front page of the ColumbiaUniversity website, 18 Jan 2001, and subsequent University Recordarticle[18] announcing theretirementof Joe Sulsona, shift supervisor of the Computer Center machine room,after 42 years: 'Sulsona, a New York City native, went from high schooldirectly to the military. When he returned from Korea in 1957 at the age of23, he studied the latest in computing, gaining experience as a boardprogrammer, which involved the manipulation of wires and plugs on a computerboard, much like the original telephone operating systems. He was hired atColumbia's alumni faculty records office as a machine operator and spent histime punching out data cards using a small keypunch machine.')

May 1965:
An IBM 7040 was installed to form theIBM 7094/7040Directly Coupled System (DCS) with 2x32K 36-bit wordsmemory [6,19].The 7040 freed the 7090 from mundane input/output and scheduling tasks so itspower could be focussed on computation.
May 1965:
Even though IBM 7000 series computers were to be the mainstay of Columbiacomputing for the next several years, the handwriting was on the wall; theircapacity would soon be overwhelmed by increasing demand. IBM proposes thenew System/360 architecture for the Computer Center on May 21. This wasto be the basis for IBM's mainframe line into the next millenium. Unlikeprevious IBM mainframes, the 360 was available in a range of compatiblemodels, from small slow machines such as the Model 20 (suitable mainly forprinting decks of cards) to the Model 92supercomputer that they proposed to Columbia, with many in between (IBM'sproposal was for a coupled Model 92 and Model 75). Each model could use thesame peripherals, and 360-series computers could also be connected to eachother in various ways and even share main memory. The 360/92 that IBMproposed, with its thin-film memory technology, turned out to be tooexpensive. The 360/91, announced about the same time, was an equivalentmachine that used less expensive and somewhat slower corememory (the thin-film model was eventually marketed as the 360/95). Toachieve supercomputer speeds, the 360/9x models pioneered new concepts such asinstruction pipelining and lookahead, branch prediction, cache memory,overlap, and parallelism. The 360/9x series is optimized for scientificcalculation and lacks a hardware decimal arithmetic capability (which issimulated in software). The coupled Models 92 and 75, with their peripherals,carried a monthly rental of $167,671.00 (after a 36% educational discount),which works out to over two million dollars a year, and about 22 million overwhat would be the 11-year lifetime of the system. [32]
Nov 1965:
The blackout of 1965. The lights went out for about 12 hoursin Manhattan, most of the US northeast, and large parts of Canada.Interestingly, I can't unearth any stories about the blackout's impact oncomputing at Columbia. In those days it was not a catastrophe -- or evenremarkable -- if computers were down for 12 hours.
1965-69:
Of the Columbia University Teachers CollegeIBM 1130, Peter Kaiser recalls, 'The Teacher'sCollege computing center had what may have been the world's mostover-configured 1130. It had not only a 2250 but alsothe additional hardware to make an 1130 into a 1500, the special versiondesigned for interactive instruction; and therefore it could also drivemultiple 2260-like terminals. The then director ofthe TCCC had ambitions use the 1130/1500 for research to improve on theMinnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory by timing the responses tothe test administered through one of these terminals. When I left to take areal-world job in 1969 that project was in abeyance.'
1966-67:
Ken King offers a course in 'computer appreciation'. Demand was highand half of the 60 students who tried to enroll had to be turned away.Popular computer courses are also offered this year in Engineering,Mathematics, and Sociology [38].
Sode Es Informatica Mac Manual Integracion Index
1966:
Watson Lab gets one of the first APL terminals (an IBM 1050), hookedto the M44/44X system in Yorktown, which is a 7044 computer coupled with a7055 computer that controls a number of terminals. 'This system is used tosimulate a number of 44X computers, including one per 1050 terminal; the 44Xis the computer seen and programmed by the user operating from a 1050terminal. It is primarily for users of FORTRAN IV' but the 1050 can alsobe used to run 'APL (Iverson Language) programs' on Yorktown's 360/50(Iverson worked at the Yorktown facility) [88].APL soon becomes quite popular, both at Watson Lab and CUCCA. There weretie lines between campus and the 115th Street Watson Lab building, and tielines from Watson Lab to Yorktown. The Watson receptionist (Annie Hall)could, upon request, connect the two, allowing campus2741 data terminals to access APL at Yorktown [106].
Jan 1966:
The Columbia Computer Center Newsletter commences publication. It wouldcontinue in one form or another until November 1994.
Oct 1966:
ADPC staff moves to Casa Hispanica at 612 West116th Street (around the corner from Chock Full O' Nuts and a couple doorswest of Campus Deli), sharing the small building with the Department ofSpanish and Portuguese [20] and the IBM teachingfacility [17]. Staff from the academic Computer Centeralso begin to move into this tiny building. Soon it is crammed beyondcapacity and offices spill over into neighboring apartment buildings (520 W114th Street plus a long-gone building on West 117th Street, itself (thestreet) also just a memory).
1967:
Dr. Seymour H. Koenig (PHOTO), who received hisPh.D. in Physics from Columbia in 1952 (and his BS in 1949) and joined WatsonLab the same year, is appointed its Director [9]. Bythis time Watson laboratory has RJE access to the big IBM 360s in Yorktown,but when then the link is down they use the CUCCA facilities [9].
1967:
Library automation begins about here. I remember some form ofautomation starting in the 1966-68 timeframe when I was a student assistant inButler -- there was already a Library Systems Office on the Mezzanine then; Iused to schlepp decks of cards and listings back andforth to the Computer Center for them. By 1967, circulation was alreadycomputerized in Central Circulation and Burgess-Carpenter (where I worked atthe time), and a collaboration was underway with Stanford and the Universityof Chicago regarding cataloging and acquisitions [24];perhaps this was the origin of RLIN. CLICK HEREfor more about library automation.ANDHERE.
Mar 1967:
In response to IBM's May 1965 proposal, and after lining up sources offunding for it, the Computer Center announces its plan to upgrade andmodernize its equipment and to unify academic and administrative computing ina Computer Center Newsletter article written by (of all people) PresidentGrayson Kirk [V2#2-3]. In the first stage, October 1967, an IBM 360/50 was rented [19,20,24], to allow the 7090-to-360 conversion to begin.
Aug 1967:
Second stage: An IBM 360/75 was purchasedand linked to the 360/50. In the ensuing months, staff learned OS/360, JCL,and some new programming languages like PL/I and SNOBOL, as well as newversions of old ones like WATFOR (the University of Waterloo version ofFortran), and then quickly began to modify the operating system for purposesof accounting and resource limitation, and also to add support for IBM 2741 and other terminals that were not supported yetand then to create a conversational monitor called CLEO to allow jobsubmission and retrieval from terminals [24].
Aug 1967:
The US government mandates a chargeback scheme for computer time,launching the Computer Center on a neverending series of increasingly baroquecharging schemes involving 'hard currency' and 'funny money.' The firstsuch scheme was a simple $150 per hour of CPU time (which, in those days, wasthe same thing as elapsed time), with some grandfathering of existingunsupported projects (Letter of Warren Goodell, 1 Aug 1967, AcIS archives).
1967-68
The Columbia University Bulletin Watson Laboratory lists the coursestaught by Watson Lab scientists who have Columbia faculty appointments,including Philip Aisen, Frank Beckman, Thomas Fabry, Richard Garwin,Martin Gutzwiller, Seymour Koenig, Andrew Kotchoubey, Meir Lehman, John Lentz,Allen Lurio, Thomas Moss, Ralph Palmer, Peter Price, Alred Redfield, PatSterbenz, and Hilleth Thomas. After the Computer Center openedin 1963, Watson Lab is no longer the focus of computing; its courseofferings concentrate on biology, mathematics, and physics, but severalcomputing courses are still listed, including EE E6827x-E6828y DigialComputer Design (Prof. Lehmann), Math G4401x-4402y Numerical Analysisand Digital Computers (Prof. Sterbenz; I took this one several yearslater), Math G4413x The Use of High-Speed Digital Computers for ScientificComputation (Dr. Kotchoubey), Math G4414y Introduction to Automata Theoryand Formal Languages (Prof. Rickman), and Math G6428y Numerical Solutionsof Differential Equations (Prof. Thomas).
1968:
The Department of Electrical Engineeringbecomes the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Thiswas to be the locus for computer science instruction and research until theestablishment of a separate Computer Science Departmentin 1979.
Jan 1968:
Raphael Ramirez starts work as an operator in the machine room.CLICK HERE to read his reminiscences of theearly days.
Feb 1968:
The IBM 7040 was removed[19]. CLEO, an interactive terminal monitor developedhere, was released and announced [24].
Apr-May 1968:
The Columbia student uprising of 1968. Computer Center managementand some of the staff feared the worst -- invasion, occupation, wreckage --but nothing happened to the Computer Center at all. Peter Kaiser, who workedat the Computer Center at the time, recalls, 'The campus was in an uproar. Sowas much of America, and the political powers that be were frightened andacting ugly; I have vivid memories of the NYC police lined up ready to doviolence to the students who had occupied the administration building, whichthey eventually did by invading the building and beating up everyone in sight.Before the police stormed the building, though, the computer center'sadministration feared that the center itself would be occupied, so there wereworried talks about what to do if that ever happened. In the event it didn'thappen, but the uproar delayed the delivery of the 360.' Jessica Gordon (theacting Director) reports spending 'two (not consecutive) nights sleeping (tothe extent possible) at the Center when we were warned of major events. Oneday I was standing on College Walkwith a group of others [including Raphael Ramirez]watching the specialTactical Police [Force]., jack-booted thugs, marching onto campus. As theypassed, one of them turned to us and said 'Hi there, sports fans!'. As aparticipant, I have no recollection of the Computer Center ever beingconsidered as a target for occupation or attack, nor does the ComputerCenter's Annual report for 1967-68 make any mention of it[24]. However, there might have been a picket lineafterwards, since picket lines went up in front of most academic buildings.
Jul 1968:
ADPC joins the Computer Center with its new director (yet to bechosen after York Wong resigned to resume his studies, but who would be JonTurner) reporting to Ken King. Now there is One Computer Center. Conversionof ADP applications from IBM 1401/1410 to IBM 360 architecture begins; thiswould take until 1973 [20]. Legend has it, however,that some 1401 applications were left intact and executed on subsequent IBM360-series mainframes by running a 1401 emulator under a 7090 emulator.Warren Goodell's 14 June 1968 letter announcing the change stresses that evenmore important than the consolidation of all applications on the new equipmentis 'the prospect of increased freedom for interchange of ideas and techniquesof programming and systems analysis between staffs now separated by artificalorganization boundaries' (AcIS archive).
Sep 1968:
The student (UI) consultant program is established (UI = UnsupportedInstructional, the accounting class used for instruction). This program isstill active today. Students with knowledge of Columbia's computer systemsand applications are hired part-time to help users in the public areas.Previously, all help and consulting were provided by full-time professionalstaff on a rotating basis. Afterwards, full-timers continued to take theirturns, but now could devote more time to systems and applications developmentand support. For more about the origins of the student consulting system,READ THIS.
Dec 1968:
The IBM 7094, 1401, and 360/50 are removed. The 1401 is moved to theController's Office [19]. IBM 360 equipment at theend of 1968 consisted of [24]:
  • Model 75 CPU 2075 with 2.5 million bytes of memory.
  • Two processor storage units 2365 (512K total)
  • Selector Channel 2860-II
  • Drum storage control 2820
  • Drum storage unit 2301(fixed-head cylindrical disk for swapping)
  • Direct-access storage facility 2314 with 2844 2-channel control unit
  • Two storage control units 2841
  • Eight disk storage drives 2311
  • Multiplexor channel 2780
  • Two card reader/printer controls 2821
  • Four printers 1403 with 1416 print train
  • Two card reader/punches 2540
  • Two typewriter terminals 2740
  • Forty typewriter terminals 2741
  • Two communications adapters 2701
  • Display control 2848-I
  • Ten display stations 2260-2
  • Two tape control units 2803
  • Two magnetic tape units 2402-2 (4 drives)
  • Magnetic tape unit 2402-5 (2 drives)
  • Two magnetic tape tape units 2402-6 (4 drives)
  • On-Line CRT display Stromberg-Datagraphics 4060

With the exception of the last item, all model numbers are IBM.

Dec 1968:
One of the last gasps of the 7090/7094 system was an early example ofcomputer-generated film by a participant in the 1968 studentuprising, DenysGeorge Irving. Here (for as long as thelink lasts) is his film “69”, and hereis a list of other works of his.
Mar 1969:
The IBM 360/91 supercomputer (PHOTOS), oneof the first 'third generation' computers andthe biggest, fastest (and probably most expensive)computer on earth at the time, is installedand coupled with the 360/75 [19]. Thus for the secondtime in 15 years, Columbia is home to the world's fastest computer.Only fifteen 360/91swere made and four of them were retained by IBM for their internal use (other360/9x sites included Princeton University and NASA Goddard Space FlightCenter on West 112th Street, just a few blocks away); the giant computer tookevery inch of space in the Computer Center machine room. extensiverenovations had to made to accommodate its sprawling dimensions [20] (this is an understatement; in fact the ComputerCenter entrance had to be demolished just to get it in the door and mostinterior walls removed to make space for it [V2#6]).
  • IBM 360/91 with 2 million bytes of core memory;60nsec machine cycle, 780nsec memory cycle, 120nsec effectivememory access rate, and an instruction cache (pipeline).
  • An additional drum.
  • All of the peripherals and equipment listed above for the 360/75.
  • Two full-time IBM technicians on site (Hansund Fritz?)

The 360/75 became the Attached Support Processor (ASP) for the 91, essentiallya job scheduler and input/output controller, freeing the 91 for intensivecomputation. I don't have a photo of our own Model 75, butHERE is one from IBM.

Rather than rent the coupled 360/75/91 system as IBM proposed, the Universitypurchased it outright for seven million dollars [19],to be amortized over seven or eight years (whether seven or eight was a pointof much contention, as it affected the chargeback rates levied upon researchgrants; in fact it was in operation for more than eleven years; thus thedecision to purchase saved about fifteen million dollars). Of the total cost,three million dollars was for the 360/91 CPU, memory, and second drum; thiswas only half the list price due to the educational allowance that wasnegotiated. The rest was for the 360/75 and its peripherals.

My own (perhapsinflated) recollection is that the 360/91 covered about an acre of floorspace, most of which was devoted to full-sizecabinets each containing 16K of core memory, for a total of 2MB at about8 square feet of floorspace (and about 48 cubic feet) per 16K, plussurrounding floorspace for access, times 300. Each memory cabinet had aglass door so you could look in and see each bit. All the disks, tapes, printers, Teletypes and everything else were in there too,plus a vast tape library and specialized test equipment such as the BOM(Byte Oriented Memory) tester.

All this was powered through a gigantic cast-iron motor generator weighingwho-knows-how-many tons (just the flywheel probably weighed a ton) putting out400-some Volts 3-phase power, and cooled by distilled water trucked in by DeerPark in big glass bottles in wooden crates. There was a control room in thebasement full of pipes, valves, gauges, pumps, and water jugs and a mammothcooling tower upstairs, venting half a million BTUs per hour into theatmosphere (Alan Rice, a physics PhD student who was also a night-shiftoperator, recalls an incident in which a heat alarm summoned the firedepartment, who were ready to chop the machine up with axes until he talkedthem out of it).

But the most impressive feature of the 360/91 was its control panel(PHOTO). The operators used to turn off the roomlights and stare it at all night, waiting for the yellow 'loop mode' lightcame on (executing a loop in the pipeline without accessing core memory);this was the sign of a well-crafted program.(For more about loop mode,READ THIS).

There was an ongoing bubble chamber experimentin the machine room, which began in the 7094 days. Stereo photographs ofbubble chamber events were digitized using the High-Energy Particle Detector(HPD) Flying Spot Scanner (HPD might also stand for Hough-Powell Device),channel-attached to the 360/91, as was a very largeIBM 2250 video display with light pen (this terminalalone was said to have cost $100,000), to allow scientists to interactivelyselect interesting events for analysis. This kind of work required physiciststo take the computer standalone for hours at a time, which became problematicin later years when it was in demand by the general academic andadministrative computing population around the clock, and eventually theexperiment was discontinued: the science for which the computer was originallyacquired, and which provided much of the funding for it, was squeezed out bythe mundane requirements of instruction and administration.

The Stromberg-Carlson 'on-line CRT display' (NEED PHOTO) was in fact a kind ofgraphics plotter, about the size of a panel truck, originally in the machineroom but later parked outside in the hallway where it couldn't hurt the othermachines. Users created graphics images on the mainframe using a packagecalled IGS, wrote them to 7-track magtape, and had the operators feed themagtape to the plotter. The images were projected on a screen inside the box;a 35mm camera -- no kidding -- would take a picture of the screen, and thensomehow disgorge its film, which would be developed in chemical baths, washed,and mounted as a slide that would eventually pop out of the little output slotif all went well, which rarely was the case -- more often the machine leakedacid and/or caught fire. Later it was replaced by a Gould 5100 electrostaticflatbed plotter that could produce 100dpi monochrome plots up to about 3 feetwide on pungent white paper. Various plotting packages (including onethat Howard Eskin and I wrote that fitted lines, curves, and splines to datapoints) were available for it on the mainframe only.

Apr 1969:
The Columbia Computer Center develops, funds, and conducts a6-month training course in computerskills for 23 students from the local Black and Latino communities: keypunching and COBOL programming, with highly successful (96%) post-graduationjob placement and followup. (V4#20).
1 Oct 1969:
The first ARPANET transmission took place between the University ofCalifornia at Los Angeles (UCLA) and Stanford Research Institute (SRI).Shortly thereafter connections were made to the University of California atSanta Barbara and the University of Utah. The ARPANET expanded to thirteensites by January 1971, 23 sites by April 1972, and eventually grew intotoday's wordlwide Internet. Membership was limited to US Department ofDefense research grantees until the early 1980s, at which time ColumbiaUniversity would join.
Dec 1969:
The IBM 1130 at Lamont Geological (now Earth)Observatory in Palisades NY is connected to the Computer Center's IBM 360/91by leased line for remote job entry (see Glossary),partially replacing the previousmessenger service. This was a first in long-haul networking at ColumbiaUniversity (V4#23). (Peter Kaiser reports that Columbia Teachers Collegealso had an IBM 1130, and it was connected as an RJE station in the sameway prior to 1969, but since TC is just across 120th Street, it's not exactlylong haul networking.)

[ Top ]

[ Early ][ 1920 ][ 1930 ][ 1940 ][ 1950 ][ 1960 ][ 1970 ][ 1980 ][ 1990 ][ 2000 ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]
1970:
Read an excellent summary of the state of data communications in 1970:The IBM Data CommunicationsPrimer (PDF).
Sep 1970:
The IBM Watson Research Laboratory at Columbia University closes after25 years of operation and a remarkable record of discovery and achievement.The idea of corporate-sponsored multidisciplinary pure research pioneeredhere had proven so successful that IBM built a new and much larger facilityin 1961 inYorktown Heights,NY, with otherssoon to follow in San José, Zürich, and elsewhere, but its researchheadquarters remained at Columbia,IBM's firstresearch laboratory, until 1970. The IBM T.J. Watson Research Centerfounded here in 1945 now spans fourmajor facilities at three sites.

The Columbia Computer Center offices and the Columbia Purchasing Departmentmove to the Watson Lab building on 612 West 115th Street. The IBM-Columbiarelationship continues for some time afterward mainly in the form of facultyappointments (in 1976 I took a graduate-level numerical analysis course inthe Engineering School from one such professor, Pat Sterbenz, author of thebook Floating-Point Computation). IBM left behind a machineroom with raised floor (back of 7th floor, where they had their 1620), a fully equipped classroom (back of 1), and lotsof furniture including my 1940s-vintage Steelcase desk with metal PhysicsDept ID plate attached (dating from World War II when IBM moved into Pupin).During its residence at Columbia University, IBM Watson Laboratory staff hadbeen granted 67 patents and published 359 articles in recognized scientificjournals [9].

Dorothy Marshall [11] writes, 'The third floor [of 612 West 115th Street]was entirely without inner walls and contained large milling machines andother noisy tooling machines, as well as pipes, hoses, and exhaust ducts[but] the staff at Casa Hispanica felt they were extraordinarily crowded'[so were glad for the additional space]. Nola Johnson writes in the sameissue, 'I remember when we were packed like sardines in Casa Hispanica.There would be three or four of us in one tiny room, complete with keypunchand fireplace.'

Until about the mid-1970s, CUCC staff submitted jobs from Watson (as they haddone from Casa Hispanica), and messengers went back and forth deliveringdecks of cards and rolled-up printouts. In fact,rolled-up printouts still arrived each day from a daily batch job that wassubmitted decades ago and ran faithfully until 2004 when the Academic IBMmainframe was retired; nobody knew exactly what the batch job didor how to cancel it.

31 Jan 1971:
Professor Wallace Eckert, founder of the WatsonScientific Computing Laboratory, attends theApollo 14 launch. The lunar orbit calculations upon which the Apollomissions were based were done by Eckert at Watson Laboratory and on theSSEC computer [42,92],designed at Watson Laboratory under Eckert's direction in thelate 1940s, and later improved on the Lab'sNORC,IBM 650, and1620 computers, andstill later on the Computer Center'sIBM 7094. Eckert died six months later.
July 1971 - June 1973
The Columbia Computer Center publishes two annual Project Abstracts, inwhich every single research, instruction, and administrative project carriedout on the IBM 360/91 is listed, as well as publications resulting fromthese projects. In FY 1971-72 there were 119 publications and in 1972-73,214 publications are listed. Each abstract is about 250 pages long; thefirst one was generated by a SNOBOL program and printed on the 1403 printer;the second one was typeset somehow using programs written by Computer Centertechnical staff. I would call this the Golden Age of the ComputerCenter, reflecting an unparalleled degree of collaboration between thefaculty and the Computer Center and the accomplishment of much work thatmight well have had an impact on the real world — medicine, socialresearch, physical sciences, engineering, every field was represented.Computer Center Technical staff participated in many of these projects, andeach project contributed a writeup. The projects themselves arefascinating, about 100 pages of project description in each volume, about 5projects per page.
Aug 3-5, 1971:
At the second annual Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) computerchess championship at ACM 71 in Chicago, the Columbia Computer ChessProgram (CCCP) came in tied for 3-6 in a field of 8. CCCP was written byColumbia student (and now CS faculty member) Steve Bellovin and CUCCA's AronEisenpress, Ben Yalow, andAndrew Koenig.For more about the development ofCCCP, READ THIS.
Aug 1971:
Stanford University's Wylbur [49]is installed on the 360/75, replacing a previous system called CRBE. Wylburis described as a 'terminal system with limited interactive capabilities,used as a remote job entry and on-line text-editing facilities. . Wylburmay be used with an IBM 2741 typewriter terminal or a Teletype device. At present CUCC's Wylbur does notsupport IBM 2260 terminals' (early video terminalsin the 2nd floor Computer Center terminal room); the Jan 1972 Newsletterannounces their replacement with a 'similar CRT device', the Hazeltine 2000 (four of them) [V6#7]. The IBM 2741 was a Selectric typewriter embedded in asmall-desk-size cabinet crammed with electronics and wires, whichcommunicated at 134.5 bits per second, half duplex (when it was thecomputer's turn to transmit, it physically locked the typewriter keyboard).There was also limited dialup access; in those days this was at 110 to 300bits per second by acoustically coupled modems.More about Wylbur below.
Oct 1971:
Ken King resigns as Computer Center Director and moves toCUNY as Dean ofComputer Systems. Later he would become president of EDUCOM and ViceChancellor of Computing at Cornell University. Dr. WarrenF. Goodell, VP for Administration, Ken's boss, assumes Acting Directorposition (V6#6), but since he was not on site, Jessica Hellwig (Gordon),who had previously been on the IBM Watson Lab computing staff[21] had day-to-day responsibility.

(Newsletters of the early 70s were devoted mainly to JCL hints and tips,announcements of meetings and conferences, announcements of OS/360 upgrades,explanations of cost accounting, and lists of unclaimed tapes in the tapelibrary -- up to 6 pages of numeric tape IDs on one occasion (in the EarthWeek issue no less: V6#5, 15 Apr 1971) -- plus the annual April Fools Issue,usually featuring parodies of cost accounting.Prior to 1971, they also contained abstracts or reports of researchprojects, e.g. 'Motivating Learning in Interracial Situations' (V5#2); 'FrenchBusiness Elite Study', Jonathan Cole et al; 'Transport and Fluid Mechanics inArtificial Organs', Ed Leonard et al (V5#13); as well as Computer ScienceColloquia.)

Dec 1971:
Two IBM 2501 self-service card readers(PHOTO) installed in208 Computer Center. 'The use of self-service card readers affords CUCCusers much greater security for their decks at both the submission and theretrieval points of running a job. Users will be able to read in their owndecks and keep them while the job is running -- thereby eliminating the riskof loss or mishandling of the deck by the Center. Also, since input decks nolonger need be left in the output bins, the exposure of users' JOB cards --and therefore their project numbers -- to anauthorized persons [somethings never change] will be significantly reduced. In addition to thisincreased security, the 2501's will also provide greater efficiency since theuser will be able to discover and correct immediately such problems asoff-punched cards [hanging and pregnantchad were evidently not an issue in 1971], rather than havingto wait for the job to be processed by the Center.' (V6#year19) Also on thesecond floor was an IBM 360 Model 20 used for printing card decks onto fanfoldpaper, duplicating card decks, and so on; the desired function could beselected with a dial. There was (and had been for some time) a key punch roomon the first floor. Later the Model 20 was moved to the key punch room.
Apr 1972:
TPMON installed, allows terminal lines to be switched among differentapplications such as Wylbur (and what else?) rather than dedicated toa specific one.
Sep 1972:
IBM OS/360 21.0 installed (V6#33).

Sode Es Informatica Mac Manual Integracion Index 2017

1973:
The following was posted by Arthur T. Murrayon alt.folklore.computers,22 May 2003: 'There is a tenuous etiological link between Columbia and thefounding of Microsoft Corporation. Here in Seattle WA USA, a ColumbiaPh.D. grad in astronomy, Dr. James R. Naiden -- now in his late eighties --around 1973 was teaching Latin at The Lakeside School. 'Doc' Naiden observedthat the students were eager to get into computers, so he asked (Naiden wasalways starting things, e.g., he hired Vilem Sokol to run the Seattle YouthSymphony for many years; he also started a history-of-literature or some suchgroup, still allegedly running at the University of Washington) the LakesideMothers Club to donate some money from their annual Lakeside Rummage Sale tobuying some computer time-share for the kids -- back then there were nopersonal computers. The Mothers put up one thousand dollars, which Bill Gatesand Paul Allen ran through in a matter of weeks. Upshot: Columbia >>Doc Naiden >> Lakeside School >> Microsoft Corp.'
Jan 1973:
V6#46 mentions twenty-fiveIBM 2741terminals being replaced by(presumably compatible) Anderson-Jacobson 841 terminals, which were cheaper torent ($88 versus $100 per month).
Feb 1973:
The Self-Service Input/Output (SSIO) Area(PHOTO GALLERY)is opened on the first floor of the Computer Center building. Equipmentincluded two card readers,two IBM 1403 printers,one online card punch (NEED PHOTO),a sorter,a collator,an interpreter,a duplicator,four Hazeltine 2000 user terminals,and one job inquiry console -- all 'self service' -- plus a large number ofIBM 029 key punches, and a resident 'Insultant' whomI remember well from my student days. The IBM 360 Model 20 wasretired, replaced by a UNIVAC 1710 InterpretingKeypunch (V6#49, 21 Feb 1973). Now, for the first time, users could notonly submit their own jobs but also get the results themselves as soon as thejob had run. Sometimes, standing in line at the card readers, were socialscientists with 'data sets' spanning 4 or 5 boxes of cards (2000 cards perbox); submitting jobs of this size rarely proceeded without incident (jams,dropped decks). The normal student Open Batch job deck was a quarter inchthick and generally went through the system quickly. A Hazeltine 2000 ASP JobInquiry station let you watch your job rise through the queue so you couldelbow your way through the crowd to the printer when your job output started.Every night from 7 to 9pm was 'System Time', meaning the Systems Group fromWatson Lab had the 360/91 to themselves and the readers and printers were shutdown. The SSIO area was a miserable place during those two hours. More aboutSSIO HERE. More about self-servicecomputing just below in the entry for Sep 1973.
22 May 1973:
Birth of Ethernet (a local area networking technology that would reachColumbia in the early 1980s and persist for decades), developed by BobMetcalfe of Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), which also gave usthe graphical user interface and desktop metaphor.
May 1973:
Resignation of Joe Gianotti (Assistant Director), Ira Fuchs (systemsprogrammer, who would go on to direct theCUNY facility and to foundBITNET, become President ofCREN, etc.), Aron Eisenpress, Ben Yalow, and other membersof the Systems group, to join Ken King at CUNY, which was acquiring brand-newthen-leading-edge IBM 370/168 hardware (V6#54). Soon more would follow.
May 1973:
Dr. BruceGilchrist is appointed the new Director of the Columbia University Computer Center (he would assume full-time duties in July). Healso receives an appointment to the faculty of Electrical Engineering andComputer Science. Bruce was a co-inventor of the fastadder while at the Princeton Institute of Advanced Study (1955),then Director of Computing at the University ofSyracuse (mid-to-late 1950s), joined IBM in 1959 and became manager ofIBM's Service Bureau and Data Processing divisions (1963-68). While at IBMBruce was Secretary and then Vice President ofthe Association for Computing Machinery,ACM (1960-64), and afterwards was President and Executive Director of theAmerican Federation of Information Processing Societies, AFIPS (1968-73).His final project at Columbia was the installation of the $20-million-dollarIBM/Rolm Computerized Branch Exchange, not just the University's firstdigital telephone system, but also the way that almost every single room(inclusing in dormitories) on the Morningside campus got high-speed dataaccess.
Sep 1973:
Bruce introduced the Open Batch system (V6#60), opening up 'TheComputer' to the masses for the first time, and renamed CUCC (ColumbiaUniversity Computer Center) to CUCCA (Columbia University Center for ComputingActivities), in recognition that computing was beginning to take place outsidethe machine room. SSIO soon became unbelievably crowded.
Oct 1973:
The IBM 1410 isremoved [19].
1974:
Snapshot: When I came to the CUCCA Systems Group in 1974,Dr. Howard Eskin was manager of Systems(197?-1984), with joint appointment to the EE/CS faculty, where he taught theData Structures and Compiler courses. The big languages for systems programming then were 360 assembler, APL,PL/I and SPITBOL (a SNOBOL dialect). CUCCA included both academic andadministrative computing under a single director, all inthe Watson building at 612 W 115th Street.Administrative computing (ADP) shared floors 2-5 with the Purchasing Office;the Director's office and administrative was staff on 6, academic on 7-8.Offices had chalkboards for scribbling ideas and diagrams. The SystemsGroup (where I worked) was on the 7th floor, 2-3 people to a room, each roomwith a single shared Hazeltine terminal, connectedat 1200 bps to a multiplexer in the back of 7 that was connected by leasedtelephone line to the 3705 in the machine room, and that always conked outon rainy days. There was no e-mail. The Penthouse was a kind of cafeteria,with tables and chairs (I remember checkered tablecloths and ginghamcurtains) and a working, if rarely-used, kitchen. The back of the firstfloor was a large classroom (now divided into the network and mail rooms);across from the elevator was a big Xerox copying room (Joe Iglesias), andthere was a grand lobby and reception area, approximately where the 'artgallery' is now, plus some administrative offices (Helen Ransower). Therewas a shower in the basement (later converted to a darkroomby Andy Koenig, and laterto a weight-lifting room by Lloyd, the messenger/front-desk guy, an Olympichopeful). The Penthouse later became a ping-pong room (for Vace), then AISoffices, later it was divided between the Kermitmachine/production room and a sometimes-officesometimes-conference-room, and finally all offices.

The back of the 7th floor was an IBM machine room dating from the 1950s,complete with raised floor, 'space phone' floor-tile pullers, andcommunication cables radiating out to all the offices. The famous 1957 bookabout IBM, Think [8], speaks of teakpaneling and cozy fireplaces, but those were in thefirst Watson Lab, not this one.

In those days, the Computer Center had a certain academic standing not onlythrough faculty appointments, but also for its R&D activities and library.The non-circulating research library (not to be confused with theThomas J Watson Library of the Business School) in room 209 of the Computer Center Building was a full-fledged branch ofthe Columbia Library, complete with card catalog and librarian (the originallibrarians were Julia Jann and Hugh Seidman; Nuala Hallinan [20] was librarian from 1966 to 1973, succeeded by EvelynGorham). The holdings, cataloged in Butler Library, included computer sciencebooks and journals as well as computer manuals and Computer Centerhandouts [25]. New acquisitions continued untilat least 1973. Eventually (about 1980) the collection was transferred to theEngineering Library.

Several technical staff members performed pure R&D, for exampleRichard Siegler who worked half-time on an AI medical diagnosis assistantin SPITBOL with Dr. Rifkin at the Medical Center. An annual catalog, theColumbia University Bulletin, Computing Activities [7] was published, as well as a Technical Abstract ofeach year's research projects. CUCCA was co-sponsor (with EE/CS) of theUniversity Colloquium in Computer Science. There was an alliancewith NASA Goddard Space Flight Center on 112th Street (Tom's Restaurantbuilding), which had one of the four existing IBM 360/95s.

The academic user community was quite small. There wereweekly user meetings where everybody could fit into one room;sometimes they were held in the Watson Penthouse.

1974-78:
Heyday of Wylbur, and the age of the Hazeltine2000 video terminal mainly on Olympus (aside from four Hazeltinesavailable to users in 208 Computer Center: V6#22). Wylbur was an interactivelinemode editor that could be used from a hardcopy or video terminal. It wasfar more than an editor, however; it was the equivalent of the latter-day'shell'; users lived in Wylbur all day, writing Wylbur execs (like shellscripts), programs, and JCL; submitting jobs, querying jobs, sending screenmessages (but not e-mail) to each other, and so on. Wylbur originally camefrom Stanford but was improved beyond recognition by Dave Marcus and laterVace Kundakci, who also converted it to TSO and later to VM/CMS. It's stillused today on our IBM mainframes, but unfortunately we could never export itdue to licensing issues. Eventually Wylbur terminals -- hardwired to the 3705-- were available to departments; sometimes these were video terminals,sometimes IBM 2741 (IBM hardcopy terminals made fromSelectric typewriters).

When developing software on the mainframe, writing in assembler, Fortran,PL/I, etc (compiled, not interpreted, languages), programs would often 'dumpcore' because of faulty instructions (bugs, mistakes). In those days, a coredump meant a literal dump of literal core memory to the printer, in hex,sometimes several feet thick. To find the fault, programmers would have todecode the core dump from the listing by hand, separating instructions,addresses, and data -- a lost art (and good riddance!) When the DEC-20s arrived on the scene, it became possible to analyzeand debug core images (and even running programs) interactively andsymbolically with a tool called (what else) DDT, and debugging tasks that oncetook days or weeks became quick and even fun. DDT-like tools live on today inUnix as 'adb' and 'gdb'.

May 1974:
Snapshot: Wylbur has 500 users. CALL/360 has 50-100 users. Thereare 2000 batch users. 50% of each programmer's time is spent helping users.ADP submits 10% of the batch jobs but uses 50% of the machine. Because oftheir EAM backgrounds, the Registrar's and Controller's Offices consider the360/91 a 'large sorter'. 90% of billing is for funny money. Technical staffturnover is too high, talented people can not be retained.[33]
1974-75:
First 'proof of concept' home computers introduced (Mark-8, Altair).
1975:
IBM 3705 communications front end replaced by an NCR COMTEN (which lasteduntil August 1998), after a two-week training course in the Watson Labclassroom in the back of the 1st floor.
Jul 1975:
A DEC PDP-11/50 minicomputer (PHOTOS)was installed, running the RSTS/E timesharing system (we considered UNIX,but it was not nearly ready for large-scale production use in a hostileenvironment). This wasthe first true general-purpose public-access timesharing system (not countingAPL and CALL/OS (aka CALL/360), which were both OS/360 subsystems (essentiallybatch jobs, each of which controlled a number of terminals simultaneously);the latter was only for the Business School and APL, though open to thepublic, required special terminals which were not to be found in abundance,and was not exactly user friendly). RSTS/E was to be a small pilot project toabsorb the CALL/OS users and attract new ones. 32 people could use it at atime (because it had 32 terminals). Accounts were free. Within a few monthsof installation, it was already logging nearly ten times the usage thatCALL/OS had at its peak [19].
(From 'Bandit', 6 July 2010) CALL/360 was written for Buck Rogers of IBM by seven guys who hadworked together at GE in Phoenix, then moved to the San Jose Bay Area.They wrote CALL/360 for a fixed-price, 10 month contract.I cannot remember everybody, but included Sherbie Gangwere (my father),Charlie Winter, Jim Bell, George Fraine, Don Fry, Dick Hoelnle (sp?) and ???(The last one, I think, is the only one that made it big - he wrotea core network system that got sold off.)Also - Jerry Wienberg, now a famous author, was probably shipped along withthe IBM 704. He was sent with the first 10 machines,and taught many how to program it.

The primary programming language (like in CALL/OS) was BASIC (another reasonwhy RSTS was chosen over UNIX, which didn't have BASIC), but Fortran andMacro-11 were also available. As I recall, the PDP-11/50 cost about $150,000.It occupied a fairly large room (208) in the Computer Center down the hallfrom the IBM machine room, and was comprised of four full-width cabinets (CPU,tape drive, communications, I forget what else) and a 92MB RP04 3330-type disk drive, plus a 2K fixed-head drive forswapping (RS04?). I took care of it myself (backups and all) for maybe ayear, then Ben Beecher joined me and later also some part-timers. Ben and Isat in the room with it full-time for a couple years. Our terminals wereDECwriters (later VT05, VT50, VT52, and finally VT100, and atone point a GE Terminet, that worked and soundedlike a bandsaw). But even without the Terminet, the room was so loud we hadto wear airport ear-protectors. Ben was RSTS manager after the DEC-20s camein 1977. Eventually RSTS had a user population of 1700. It was retired in1982.

Jul 1975:
The IBM 1410 in the Controller's Office isreplaced by an IBM 370/115 [19].
Mid 1970s:
Here begins the decline of centralized campus computing.Minicomputers begin to sprout in the departments, encouraged by governmentgrants that would buy equipment but wouldn't pay for central computertime. (The same trend was evident at other universities; it created the needfor campus networking, and thus -- since a way was needed to interconnectall these campus networks -- the Internet.) Some of the early departmentalminis I remember were the SEL 810B, Applied Physics also had an Imlac graphics processor (whichnever worked) and several early PDP-8 models forcontrolling experiments.
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, I worked in Applied Physics and used thedepartmental computers for both work and EE/CS projects. The SEL (SystemsEngineering Laboratories, later Gould) 810B (1968) was the most advanced,since it had i/o devices and could be programmed in Fortran and assemblylanguage. It had 16K of memory, 2 registers, Teletype, paper tape, card reader, drum printer,and an oscilloscope-like CRT display for graphics; CLICK HERE to see a picture of the SEL 810A, which islike the 810B but without extra i/o devices. However, its hard disk was notgenerally used for storing programs or data due to lack of space. Instead,programs were read from cards or paper tape; this required toggling in abootstrap program on the console switches: a series of 16-bit words wasdeposited in successive memory locations and then executed to activate theTeletype as the control device, which could be used in turn to activate thecard or paper tape reader to read the program. Production programs weregenerally punched in object format onto paper tape (since the paper tapereader/punch was much faster than the card reader). CLICK HERE to see the SEL 810B Manual. The PDP-8computers in the same lab had no Teletype, card reader, or paper tape; theywere programmed directly from the console switches and i/o was magtape only.

The Physics Department in Pupin Hall had a DECPDP-4, several PDP-8s, a PDP-9, and a PDP-15; Electrical Engineering had aPDP-7 on the 12th floor of Mudd, that we studied downto the gate level in the 1970s EE/CS Computer Architecture course. (ThePDP-7 is also the machine for which the UNIX operating was originallywritten at Bell Labs in the late 1960s.) The keypunch room was on the 2ndfloor of Engineering Terrace near the back exit, connected by tunnel to theSSIO area. There were often long waits for punches. The 1976 Bulletin [7] also lists:

  • A DEC PDP-11/45 and GT/40 Graphics Computer in Biology (Schermerhorn).
  • A HP 2100 in Chemical Engineering (Prentis).
  • A DG Nova 1220 and 3 DEC PDP-8s in Chemistry (Havemeyer).
  • A DG Super Nova in EE/CS (Mudd).

plus various special-purpose computers for Fourier transforms, etc, some ofthem possibly analog (rather than digital) on campus, as well as all sortsof computing equipment at the outlying campuses (no doubt a tale in itself).

1976:
Andy Koenig's RSTSe-mail program, the first e-mail at CU. Andy was a prominent member ofthe CUCCA technical staff (reponsible for at least APL and PL/I) who went on toBellLabs and fame with C++. His dad is Dr. Seymour H.Koenig, who was at Watson Lab from 1952 to 1970, and its director from 1967[9,17]. Andy's frequentco-author is Barbaro Moo,also formerly of CUCCA. (Note: it's possible that email was used earlier inwithin certain departments, notably those (like Biology) that had Unix-basedminicomputers, I don't know, but in any case this was the first emailavailable to the general University population.)

Nowadays most of the University conducts its business by e-mail, and it hasbeen an enormous productivity booster, eliminating telephone tag, enablingone-to-many messaging, and filling an ever-increasing role in instruction andresearch. As early as 1983 (the 9 Feb 1983 Newsletter, V15#2, is full ofallusions to this), professors were sending assignments to their classes bye-mail and collecting results the same way, with the added benefit ofquestions and answers and other discussions that could not fit in theclassroom schedule.

Download a free trial of the Qt framework, tools for desktop and embedded development, plus other enterprise add-ons. What's in Qt? Existing customers. Find them in the Qt account licensing portal or through the Maintenance tool in your Qt installation directory. Download qt creator for mac. Qt Creator is an open source and multi-platform IDE (integrated development environment) created to provide developers with all the tools needed to build various types of mobile and desktop based software solutions with the help of the Qt framework. User-friendly and clean styled interface.

Readers who were not exposed to electronic mail prior to the Internetexplosion of the mid-1990s probably won't appreciate how much more usefuland pleasant it was before then, even in its original text-only format.Today I typically have several hundred messages waiting for me each morning(after central filtering!), of which 98% are spam, advertisements,promotions, junk mail, get-rich-quick schemes, invitations to ExclusiveHigh-Powered Executive Webcasts and Enterprise Leadership Webinars, chainletters, be-my-friend-and-share-photos, inspirational Powerpoints, strategicpartnerships, 'office humor', world class enterprise solutions, body-partenhancements, business best practices, claim your lottery winnings, claimyour inheritance, claim your fund, 'Dear beloved', 'I am dying, I don't wantyou to feel sorry for me', 'Beloved in Christ', 'Dear beneficiary','Complements of the season', confidential matter, delinquent accounts, cashgrant award, designer watches, investment opportunities, work-at-homeopportunities, get your diploma, grow your business, increase yourprofitability, 'Dear entrepreneur', 'Take this five-minute survey', offersfrom soldiers in our many wars who found barrels full of money, 'I want toplace an order with your store', low-interest loans, 'your account isexpired', Viagra, Cialis, lonely hearts, Russian beauties, 'update yourinformation', bounce notifications about mail you didn't send, anddeliberate attempts at implanting viruses (Windows e-mail attachmentscontaining viruses or worms have no effect on my UNIX-based plain-text mailclient) -- or security alerts or complaints about all of these. In the1970s and 80s, by contrast, practically every e-mail message was legitimate,worth reading, and usually only 1-2K bytes in length, and could not possiblyhurt your computer (not strictly true; it was possible to put anescape sequence in an email message that, if it arrived intact at certainkinds of terminals, could make them automatically transmit any desired textback to the host, but even if you had a terminal that responded to the escapesequence, this rarely could cause any serious demage because an email clientwould be on the receiving end, not the system command prompt).

Even when e-mail is exchanged between consenting parties, the demands posedby multimedia attachments -- Microsoft Word documents, Powerpoints,spreadsheets, images, audio and video clips, even entire music CDs or motionpictures -- have coerced the University to constantly upgrade its networkand mail server capacity, and of course the costs are inevitably passed backto the consumer in the form of tuition or overheadincreases and/or cutbacks in other areas.

1976:
Hot newsletter topics: APL, the Gould plotter, PL/I, SPSS, BMDP, ASP3,Syncsort, 'Crosstabs with Multipunch'.
Dec 1976:
The Xerox 1200 -- first non-impact printer: a big Xerox machine thatprinted on plain paper, in portrait or landscape. Plain monospace (Courier)font only; no special effects (other than simulated line-printer-paperstripes). I don't remember exactly where the input came from -- either it hadan IBM mainframe channel connection, or else it read from 9-track magnetictape, but in any case it was possible to print on it from both the IBM and DECsystems.
1977:(Month?)
Because the IBM 360/91 was more suited to scientific calculations andlacked decimal arithmetic, and because of security questions posed by the OpenBatch system, which opened it up to the student population, ADP acquires aseparate mainframe exclusively for administrative work, an IBM 370/138 locatedin the Computer Center machine room and running VM/CMS (later to be upgradedto 370/148, 3031 (1979), 3083 (1983), 3090 (1986), etc). A new Personnel (nowwe would say 'Human Resources') system was developed for the 370 in house, andadministrative applications began to migrate from punch cards and batch tointeractive online systems [20]. The arrival of theIBM 370 launches an effort to convert administrative applications from batchto online, with IBM 3270 block-mode terminals allowinginteractive access to administrative systems such as student records, accountsreceivable, and so on.
Jul 1977:
The IBM 370/115 in the Controller's Office is removed. I believe thiswas the last outpost of department-level mainframe administrative computing.
Jul 1977:
The blackout of 1977. No electricity for two days (July 13-14).Howard (Eskin) and I were in Watson Lab the evening of the 13th working on thefloor plan for the 272A Engineering Terrace terminalroom when the lights went out. We were also in the middle of our first DEC-20installation, a six-week process (so two lost days were not a disaster).
Aug 1977:
Our PDP-11/50 was invaded (via modem) by a gang of prep-school kids, whohad their way with it undetected for several weeks. This was the firsthacker breakin to a Columbia computer from the outside, and it went tocourt. It cost us nearly a week of round-the-clock systems work and delayedthe DEC-20 opening by a week. Later the same group invaded other RSTS systemsand even (as I recall) destroyed a cement company in Quebec. The prep schoolin question had purchased a PDP-11 with RSTS and let the students run itwithout supervision; thus the students had hands-on access and fullprivileges, with ample opportunity to probe their own system forvulnerabilities, write Trojan-horse replacements for system software, etc,in-house before attacking external sites, and indeed they did a good job:their modified LOGIN program let them in silently, with full 'root'privileges; the modified accounting programs did not list their sessions; themodified DIRECTORY program did not list their directories or files; themodified SYSTAT program did not show their jobs, and so on. Eventually theytipped their hand by accidentally printing a password list on a publicprinter, and we tracked them down using methods remarkably similarto those used by Cliff Stoll 10 years later to catch the German hackers atBerkeley [46] (see 1986-87 below), such as Y-connectinghardcopy terminals to the modems to log dialin sessions.
Aug 1977:
Our first DECSYSTEM-20, CU20A (PHOTOS),was installed for large-scale timesharing. Accounts were free and availableto all (or maybe there was a one-time $5.00 fee; later, per-semester orper-course fees would be added). It cost 800,000 dollars [19] and was much larger than the PDP-11, a row ofdouble-width orange cabinets about 10 feet long, plus four 178MB RP06 washing-machine-size 3350-type disk drives, butunlike the PDP-11, had little in the way of lights and switches (if you didn'tcount the PDP-11/40 communications front end hidden inside it). It had 256K36-bit words of main memory, two 800/1600bpi TU45 tapedrives (later TU77, TU78), an LP20 drum printer(mainly for backup listings), and an LA36 systemconsole hardcopy terminal. It also had a DN20 communications processor(PDP-11/34 concealed in orange full-size cabinet) for remote job entry (see Glossary) to the IBM mainframes. CU20A was originally amodel 2040, and so it had core memory and no cache;later it was upgraded to a 2050 and then a 2065; the core became MOS and cachewas added, memory increased to 2MB. Each user got 35KB (that's KB, not MB orGB) of disk space. The first DEC-20 marked the beginning of the 'onlinecampus' in which the computer was used not just for calcalation andprogramming, but also communication among users and (eventually) with theoutside world.
The DEC-20 was a member of the DEC's 36-bit PDP-10line of computers, which descended from the PDP-6, first produced in 1964, andwhich itself has its roots in the 36-bit IBM 700 series that goes back to1952. PDP-10s, however, were distinct from 20s: they had a differentoperating system (TOPS-10 instead of TOPS-20); they came in a variety ofmodels (KA, KI, KL, KS), whereas DEC-20s came in only KL and KS models;PDP-10s were more suited to hands-on lab work, with all sorts of devicesand attachments lacking from the -20s such as real-time bus-attachedinstruments; DECtapes, paper tape, and graphics devices; they could beinstalled in multiprocessor configurations; and they were blue rather thanorange. DEC-20s could run TOPS-10 applications in an 'emulation mode', butnot vice versa, and until the very end, quite a bit of DEC-20 software wasindeed native to TOPS-10 (e.g. the linker and most of the compilers).

The DEC-20 pioneered all sorts of advanced concepts such as a swappablemonitor (kernel), lightweight processes (threads), page mapping, shared pageswith copy-on-write, hardware assisted paging, and other techniques to allowlarge numbers of users access to a limited resource (CLICK HERE for details).Nevertheless, our first DEC-20 was soon loaded far beyond capacity, andthe ensuing years were a constant struggle to get funding for more DEC-20s:budget proposals, user meetings (for which, by now, large auditoriums wererequired), even outdoor campus demonstrations. But DEC-20s were expensive;they demanded copious floor space and air conditioning, as well as 3-phasepower with isolated ground (a 10-foot copper stake literally driven intobedrock outside the CUCCA loading dock). Annual maintenance alone wassomething like $100,000 per machine, and each one carried an additional$10,000 electric bill. Therefore adding DEC-20s was difficult and painful.There were all sorts of revenue-raising schemes and eventually we had 4 ofthem, CU20A through CU20D, serving 6000 users, up to 70 or 80 logged insimultaneously on each. Additional DEC-20s for instruction and research wereinstalled at Teachers College and in the Computer Science department.

DEC-20s were fairly reliable for their day. Unlike the IBM mainframe with itsscheduled two-hour nightly System Time, the DEC-20s were kept runningand available all the time except for a couple hours (usually outside of primetime) every week or two for 'preventive maintenance' by DEC Field Service.But by today's standards they crashed frequently anyway, usually because ofpower glitches; so often, in fact that somebody had a batch of%DECSYSTEM-20 NOT RUNNING T-shirts made up (this was the dying gaspof the DEC-20 as it went down). Whenever a DEC-20 was up for more than 100hours, people became quite excited. The record was just shy of 800 hours(about a month); MTBF was under 100 hours (4 days). By comparison, today (8Feb 2001) I have an HP workstation in my office that has been up continuouslyfor 883 days (that's more than 21,000 hours), despite numerousbrownouts and momentary power failures, and that's without a UPS (eventuallyits running streak was interrupted at 900-some days when electricians neededto shut off power to the floor to replace the circuit-breaker panel).

For lots more about the Columbia DEC-20s,CLICK HERE.

(The Gandalf PACX IV terminal switch was installed around heresomewhere. Prior to that terminals were hardwired using various forgottentechnologies like 20mA Current Loop. The PACX was a speed-transparent1000x1000 switch, driven by little blue 'PACXboxes' on the user end, with thumbwheels to dial the desired service andan on/off switch.)

1977-78:
Use of e-mail takes off. Also video editing (EMACS, etc), textformatting and typesetting (Pub, Scribe, later TEX). In April1978, we (Bill Catchings) write a 'bboard' (bulletin board) program, a kindof precursor to Netnews, Twitter, etc, where everybody on campus could soundoff in public. Various bboards were available, including course-specificboards, topical boards, and a 'general' (any topic) board, and wereunmoderated and uncensored. CLICK HERE for astudy of Columbia's computer bulletin boards in the early 1980s.

EMACS, by the way,was created at theMITAI Lab on a PDP-10 runningMIT's IncompatibleTimesharing System (ITS)by RichardStallman, building upon the venerable Text Editor andCOrrector, TECO, written in 1962-63for the DEC PDP-1 byDan Murphy, whowas also largely responsible forTOPS-20, the operatingsystem on our DECSYSTEM-20s. I first used TECO in 1972 on a PDP-11/20 withthe DOS/Batch operating, at the Teletype console. The first release ofEMACS was in 1976 and we were using it at Columbia on CU20A by 1977.Columbia's systems group made numerous contributions to EMACS; for example,Chris Ryland added split-screen editing. In the 1980s EMACS would becompletely rewritten inLISP,to become thenow-universal GNUEMACS, one of the most prominent surviving relics of the heyday of theDEC 36-bit mainframes.

Jan 1978:
The 272A Engineering Terrace terminal room opens (V10#2). This was thefirst public terminal room outside the Computer Center building. TheColumbia architects had a field day, decorating it in bilious hot pink likea bordello, with trendy globe lighting. (The April Fools 1978 issue ofthe Newsletter (V10#5) presents the 'coveted Louis XVI Alive with the Arts'award to the Department of Buildings and Grounds [now Facilities Management]for 'their exceptional work in recreating the atmosphere of an 18th centuryFrench palace. . Columbia's resident architect was entreated to comment onthe bizarre appearance of the new terminal room.') Notwithstanding thedecor, the room was laid out according to our floorplan (Howard Eskin and Idesigned it), divided into cubicles about 4 feet high so people would haveprivacy when sitting, but could stand up to chat and hand things back andforth. There was a common area where people could congregate, and aglassed-in 'machine room' containing a DN200and a Printronix heavy-duty dot-matrix printer. Each cubicle had a terminaland a spacious working surface for books and papers and its own readinglight. Large cubicles had LA36 DECwriters(hard-copy 132-column dot-matrix printers operating at 30 cps on pin-feedgreen-and-white striped fanfold paper) and the smaller oneshad Perkin-Elmer Fox-1100 CRTs operating at 9600bps (this was the first affordable CRT, costing about $500, compared to mostothers that cost a thousand dollars and up). Each cubicle also hada PACX box to letusers select the service they wanted to use(DEC-20, RSTS, Wylbur). Eventually the lab was re-architected, expanded,and . . . REDECORATED. Too bad if you missed it(does anybody have a color photo of the original?)
Mar 1978:
APL conversion from IBM to DEC-20 was a big topic for many months.Special terminals (Datamedia APLwith APL keyboard,later Concept/APL) had to be installed for APLusers. To further encourage IBM to DEC migration, I wrote a mini-Wylbur('Otto') for the DEC-20; Joel and his brother worked on a full Wylburimplementation for some time but it's not done yet.
Apr 1978:
The CUCCA Telephone Directory and ConsultingSchedule. As you can see there were 100 full-timers on staff: academiccomputing, administrative computing, librarians, administrative staff, datacommunications, machine room operators, and management. Compared to 15 in1965 and over 300 in 2010. Note too that in those days the technical staffhelped users in person in three locations (two in SSIO, one in Mudd) and atother times they answered calls from users on their own phones — no callprocessing, no screening, no trouble tickets, no hiding behind web pages,no bureacracy. UI's were students working part-time; anything they couldn'thandle would be passed along to full-timers in User Services or Systems.Many of the UI's listed on the schedule went on to become full timers andsome even managers. (Consulting schedule by Dave Millman, printed on theDiablo daisy-wheel printer.)
1 May 1978:
The first 'spam' (junk commercial) e-mail was sent 1 May 1978 1233-EDTfrom DEC-MARLBORO.ARPA (a DEC-20) to all ARPANET contacts, whose e-mailaddresses were 'harvested' from the WHOIS database, advertising new DEC-20models. More about thisHERE.
May 1978:
OS/360 21.8 (which was released by IBM in 1970) installed on theIBM 360/91. Eight years in the making! The ex-CUCC systems people whodefected to CUNY had to come back and teach nightly classes on OS/360 andwhat they had done to it (many things, including over 200 modifications foraccounting and resource-limitation purposes) before their replacements couldbring up the new release without fear of losing something vital.
May 1978:
Tektronix 4010 graphics a big topic in thenewlsetters.

(Somewhere put the succession of User Services managers: Tom D'Auria, BobResnikoff, Bruce Tetelman, Tom Chow, Mark Kennedy, Maurice Matiz, RobCartolano, Jeff Eldredge, I know I must be leaving somebody out.) and SSIO(Marianne Clarke, Lois Dorman, Chris Gianone, .) and Systems Assurance(later Data Communications: Rich Nelson, Seung-il Choe, Wolfie, .) andCUCCA business managers (Peter Bujara, Neil Sachnoff, Patty Peters, BobBingham, Julie Lai.) About User Services, Maurice Matiz adds:

User Services existed only up to early in my era. After Vace's appointmentand my appointment (I believe the only two managerial and higher levelappointments that required a trying and complete interview by the wholeUniversity occurred in late 1989) did the groups that now define AcIS getcreated except that User Services comprised three groups.

User Services stayed until Jeff Eldrege's group was spun out of my group,which had grown to over 25 people, in late 1994. (My diagramed proposal isdated 11/28/94.) At that time we changed names. Jeff's group became theSupport Center and my group was renamed Academic Technologies. Also spunout at the time was what became EDS to report to Walter Bourne.

Dec 1978:
First mention of UNIX by CUCCA in public (referring to the BSTJ UNIX issue [15]). V10#18.
1979:
The Computer Science Department was created as a separate entity (previouslyit was part of the EE Dept) with Joseph Traub from CMU as Chair, and a$200,000 donation from IBM. Joe had beena Watson Fellow in Applied Mathematics in 1958-59 [9].The Computer Science Building was constructed 1981-83[12]. Before long a DECSYSTEM-20, several VAX-11/750s,and numerous workstations (early Suns and others) would be installed in thenew CS facility.
Jan 1979:
Public terminals were available in SSIO (20),272A Engineering Terrace (14), Furnald Lobby (4), 224 Butler (4),and Hartley Lobby (4). V11#2. Systems Assurance staff (Bob Galanos) wouldmake the rounds on a daily basis to fix broken terminals, usually by replacingfuses taken out by students to 'reserve' terminals for their own use.
Feb 1979:
Scribe, Diablo, printwheel lore dominates the Newsletter.Big business in printwheels. The Diablo was atypewriter-like terminal with a daisy-wheel print mechanism capable ofproportional spacing, superscripts and subscripts, and even boldface (bydoublestriking) and italics (by swapping printwheels). The CUCCA newsletterwas printed on the Diablo for some years, and Diablos were deployed in publicareas for users. Scribe included a Diablo driver, which produced.POD ('Prince Of Darkness') files for it, and we wrote softwareto 'spool' these files to the Diablo itself, allowing pauses to change paperor printwheels. Printwheels were available in a variety of fonts andalphabets, but weren't cheap ($98 springs to mind).
Aug 1979:
COMNDJSYS package written for SAIL (so we could write user-friendly programsfor the DEC-20 in a high-level language). Andy Lowry and David Millman.
Sep 1979:
HP2621 industrial-strength video terminalsinstalled in Mudd and elsewhere, including anew lab in Carman Hall. This wasthe face of CUCCA to our users; many of them thought the DEC-20s were made byHP. These are monochrome text terminals with good editing capabilties (forEMACS) and solidly built. Some had built-in thermal printers. A few unitsare still to be found here in good working order.
1979-80:
Chris Ryland and I write a 200-plus-page guide to DEC-20assembly-language programming. We were thinking of turning it into abook but Ralph Gorin of Stanford University beat us to it.

[ Top ]

[ Early ][ 1920 ][ 1930 ][ 1940 ][ 1950 ][ 1960 ][ 1970 ][ 1980 ][ 1990 ][ 2000 ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]
1980 Photo Gallery:
  • Machine room panorama.
  • IBM 4341s in situ.
  • The IBM Mass Storage System.
  • Tape Drives.
  • IBM Disk Farm.
1980:
Instructional computing capacity badly needs expansion. At thispoint, CUCCA has three instructional systems: the IBM 360/91 Open Batch system(soon to be retired), the PDP-11/50 (fully saturated), and a singleDECSYSTEM-20, CU20A, which is in constant demand and heavily overburdened.There is much gathering of statistics to understand usage patterns. Inresponse to student and faculty demands, the Collery Committee (Arnold Collerywas Dean of Columbia College) was appointed to make recommendations. Theinstructional computers were overloaded, but why? Was the new usage real orfrivolous? A witch-hunt was launched against 'text processing' (preparingpapers on the computer, sending e-mail, etc). Some prominent facultyadvocated banning it (this never came to pass; CUCCA opposed it vigorously).CPU and connect-time limits were to be instituted. Fees were to be increased.Various disincentives would be established against using the computers during'prime time.'

The tug of war between demand and resources is a persistent theme inacademic computing. There has never been, and probably never will be, aclear linkage between demand and supply. Whenever resources (such as computertime, disk space, modems, network bandwidth) become scarce, as they always do,funding for expansion does not flow automatically (nor should it). Firstthere is a demand for a precise accounting of how, for what, and by whom thecurrent resources are being consumed, the gathering of which in turn taxes theresources still futher. Once the information is obtained, demands to flushout inappropriate use -- whose definition varies with the times (e.g.network capacity versus Napster in 2000) -- quickly follow.

Of course instructional computing on the DEC-20s was true to this pattern.CU20A drove itself near to melting by accounting for itself. And thencomplicated limits were imposed on CPU time, connect time, and every otherimaginable resource (using locally written software) until the interactivecomputing experience was surpassingly unpleasant for everyone: students,faculty, and staff alike. Relief was still more than a year away.

The music rebalance feature that lets you adjust the levels of different elements in a finished mix is pretty nuts. Using Reddit. Help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit. I'm in the same boat, I dislike most iZotope plugins, but RX7 is a crazy tool. The music rebalance is indeed the best source separating tool on the marked so far. I've compared it to a lot of other products and I think the biggest reason why RX7 is better is because it's trained to separate Vocals, Drums and Bass. It can separate a kick drum. Sep 13, 2018  Thoughts on iZotope RX 7? IZotope released RX 7 today. Found this video on what’s new from version 6. It would be so nice to have the Music Rebalance inside an Audio Interface to adjust it whenever we want:P. Using Reddit. Help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts Communities Top Posts. Terms Content policy. https://nugreat941.weebly.com/blog/music-rebalance-rx7-izotope-download-reddit. Sep 13, 2018  Isolate mix elements from a single track with the new source separation module in RX 7, Music Rebalance. Easily reduce vocals in background music for clearer dialogue, learn how to remove vocals from a song, or separate vocal stems from a track for easy remixing. Wanted to share with the community a new tool that iZotope just released today called Music Rebalance, which is part of their audio plugin RX 7. It lets you adjust the gain of individual elements within a single mono, stereo, or multitrack file. Using Reddit. Help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts Communities Top Posts.

One of the measures taken to alleviate the load on CU20A was to abolish thefree perpetual student user IDs and replace them with class-related IDs thatlasted only for the duration of each course. While this ensured that theDEC-20 was used only for 'legitimate' purposes, it also made it impossible forstudents to build up a corpus of tools and information they could usethroughout their Columbia experience. A series of discussions took placethroughout 1980 exploring different possibilites for providing students withsome form of self-service, inexpensive, removeable media. The result was Kermit.

Jan 1980:
CUCCA announces its intention to connect to ARPANET, V12#1 (but withoutany firm prospects of doing so, since in those days the only entree was abig Defense Department grant, which we didn't have and didn't want). In themeantime, however, staff (but not end-users) had access through our DECnetlink to COLUMBIA-20.ARPA, the Computer Science DEC-20 (July 1983),and prior to that by dialup to the NYU Elf and guest accounts at Rutgers,Harvard, Stanford, CMU and elsewhere. The ARPANET was important, amongother reaons, because it was how DECsystem-10 and DECSYSTEM-20 softwaredevelopers could work together (by email) and share code (by FTP), and thiswas the beginning of the open software movement. It is important torecall that in those days we were paid to develop and share software.Nowadays most open ('free') software is created by unpaid volunteers.
Feb 1980:
DECnet first operational (between CU20A and the DN200 in Mudd).
Feb 1980:
The DEC-20 MM (Mail Manager) e-mail programbecomes popular (V12#2). This is a good example of software created byprofessional staff or graduate students at PDP-10 and DEC-20 sites on theARPANET (Stanford in this case) and freely shared with other sites. Otherexamples of the era included the ISPELL spelling checker and corrector (alsofrom Stanford), the EMACS text editor from MIT, the SCRIBE text formattingand typesetting system from CMU (which later became commercial) and TeX fromStanford, the Bliss-10 programming language from CMU, the SAIL programminglanguage from Stanford, the PASCAL compiler from Rutgers, the SITGOinstructional FORTRAN package from Stevens Institute of Technology, variousLISP systems from different places, and KERMIT communications software fromColumbia. In fact, each place contributed bits and pieces to most of thesepackages so most of them were truly cooperative efforts.

MM was used almost universally at Columbia for E-mail from 1980 until about1995, with usage trailing off thereafter as Windows and the Web took overfrom text-based computer access. When the DEC-20 line was cancelled, wewrote a new MM program in C for Unix which again, in the sharing spirit, wasmade available on the ARPANET (later Internet) and adopted by many othersites worldwide as they migrated from TOPS-20 to Unix. MM survives eveninto the 2010s (details).

Jun 1980:
We were considering joining TELENET and TYMNET (commercial X.3/X.25 basednetworks) but never did; it was way too expensive [1].These were strictly terminal-to-host networks, but would have allowedtravellers to dial up with a local call from almost anywhere in the USA orCanada, and conceivably could have taken the place of in-house modem pools.
Sep 1980:
Donald Knuth visits Columbia and gives a series of lectures onTEX, his computertypesetting system.
Oct 1980:
Second DEC-20 installed, CU20B, for use by funded researchers andstaff only; to be paid for out of income, since the budget request for asecond instructional DEC-20 had been denied, again, even though the first onewas seriously overloaded, and despite vocal support from students and faculty(and us of course). CU20B removed considerable load from CU20A and bought ussome time until we finally were able to expand the instructional resources ayear later with CU20C. (In fact, for a short period, we were able to put somestudents on CU20B, in their own 'partition', isolated from the paying users.)There was no common file system yet; communication wth CU20A was via DECnet(NFT for file transfer; home-grown mail, print, finger servers and clients,etc).
Nov 1980:
The IBM 360/91/75 is retired, replaced by twoIBM 4331s (PHOTO), CUVMA and CUVMB. These arefeatureless boxes that are (as you might expect) more compact and cheaper torun than the 360/91 (and lower too, so you can use them as coffee tables), andthey had a new operating system, VM/CMS, which allowed Virtual Machines (VM) torun other operating systems on the same machine, thus keeping our oldapplications afloat. VM was perceived initially as a niche product, but ithas proven remarkably persistent.

The 360/91 was so big it had to be cut up with chainsaws to get it out ofthe building. The Gordian knot of cabling under the floor was unceremoniouslydisposed of with giant cable snippers the size of posthole diggers.The computer chunks were trucked away and thrown into acid baths to extractthe gold. Only the 360/91 console was spared. We had it moved to the lobbyof Watson Laboratory and arranged to donate it to the now-defunctComputer Museum in Massachusetts, but it took a year anda half for them to pick it up. In the interim, bits and pieces were removedby passersby as souvenirs. (More about this in the June1982 entry.)

1981-82
ADP takes over the remaining pockets of decentralized administrativecomputing: the student systems in Philosophy Hall and the financial andpayroll systems in Hogan Hall, and to some extent also the Health Sciencescampus.
Jan 1981:
Superbrains arrive. The Intertec'Superbrain' had been chosen as the first microcomputer we would deploypublicly, despite its embarrassing name, because its solid single-piececonstruction made it virtually user-proof, and it did indeed stand up to yearsof (ab)use. It ran CP/M 2.2, an 8-bit (64K) operating system.
Apr 1981:
Bill Catchings and I design the basic Kermitprotocol. The first Kermit protocol transfer took place on April29th on a loopback connection between two serial ports on CU20B. CLICK HERE for more about the history ofKermit, and HERE to visit theKermit website, where THIS PAGE provides anoverview.
  • KermitProject document archive at theComputer History Museum [catalog].
  • Kermit Project Oral History Transcripts at theComputer History MuseumHEREand HERE.
May 1981:
I talk J. Ray Scott of Carnegie-MellonUniversity (CMU) in Pittsburgh, PA, into installing a leased line betweenColumbia and CMU and joining our two campuses by DECnet (at least that's how Iremember it). CU and CMU informally but effectively merge their DEC-20systems staffs and run common customized applications and subsystems (esp. theGALAXY spooling system, which we modified to allow printer sharing amongmultiple DEC-20s and spooling to the Xerox 9700). Soon the network, calledCCNET, expanded to several other universities, notably Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken,NJ, which played an important role in the development of Kermit protocol andsoftware until 1987, and produced Kermit programs for DEC's VMS, TOPS-10, andP/OS operating systems.
Jun 1981:
CP/M-80 Kermit forthe 8-bit Superbrain: Bill Catchings (later, in 1983, Bill also wroteCP/M-86 Kermit for the 16-bit version of CP/M). Shortly after this, theSuperbrain was deployed in Mudd. It had no applications to speak of besidesKermit, which was used by students to archive their DEC-20 files onto floppydisks (the purpose for which was Kermit developed). Floppy disks (thethen-modern 5.25' ones, not the frisbee-sized ones used on other CP/Mmicros) for the Superbrain were sold in SSIO, $6.00 each (!). Later, butbefore 16-bit micros like the IBM PC appeared, we set up (in Watson Lab) a'network' of Superbrains sharing a hard disk, with an EMACS-like editorcalled MINCE and a Scribe-like text formatter called Sribble. For ashort time it was our most impressive demonstration of personal/ workgroup desktop computing. (MINCE later became Epsilon and was popularfor some years on DOS PCs.)
12 Aug 1981:
The 16-bit IBM PC was announced; theColumbia Computer Center orders 20 of them on Day One, sight unseen. TheIBM logo makes all the difference. About half of them go to high-profilefaculty (who immediately want them to be able to communicate with ourcentral IBM and DEC mainframes; hence MS-DOS Kermit).The original PC had a monochrome monitor (color optional), one or two 160Kfloppy disks, a small amount of memory (anywhere from 16K to 256K), twoRS-232 serial interfaces, no hard disk, no networking. It ran at 4.77MHz,had BASIC built into its ROM (which could be used without an OS or disk),and ran DOS 1.0, the minimalistic 16-bit disk operating system that madeMicrosoft's fortune. Within a short amount of time, it had become thecomputer that would dominate the rest of the century and beyond, and spreadover the campus like wildfire. But it still took some years for the PC towipe out the VAXes and PDP-11s in the departments. Up through the early 90sthere were still dozens of VAX/VMS installations; entire departments andschools (such as Columbia College) ran on them, with VT100 terminals or DEC word processors (PDP-8 based DECmates) on their desktops.The PC has been a mixed blessing. Untold numbers of people-hours havebeen lost forever to tinkering -- this slot, that bus; expanded memory,enhanced memory, extended memory. . . Blue Screens Of Death, rebooting,reinstalling the operating system, searching for adapters, hunting fordrivers, installing OS and driver upgrades, resolving interrupt conflicts,partitioning disks, backing up disks, adding new devices, configuringnetworks, fighting application and OS bugs, hunting for patches, fightingviruses, and on and on. Previously this kind of thing was done by a smallcentral full-time professional staff but now it is done by everybody, all thetime, at incalculable cost to productivity and progress. Plus how many PCusers really back up their hard disks? Not many in my experience, and it isnot uncommon for important un-backed-up files to be lost in a disk crash orsimilar disaster, thus negating weeks, months, or years of work. ON THE PLUSSIDE, however, . . . (? ? ?)

My personal theory is that IBM never expected the PC to be so successful.It was thrown together in a rush by a small group (not at Watson Laboratory!)from off-the-shelf components in an effort to get a foothold in thefast-growing microcomputer market. This was notIBM's first personal computer. Besides the 1956Auto-Point Computer ('personal' but by no meansdesktop), IBM had also tried and failed with the 5100and the CS-9000 in the 1970s and early 80s, bothpersonal desktop models (we had some 5100s here; the CS-9000 was targeted atchemical engineering applications as I recall, and had a special control paneland interfaces for instruments, but included a 32-bit CPU and modernprogramming languages like Pascal, and could easily have been the high-endworkstation of the early 1980s). According to a reliable source, IBMoriginally wanted the PC to have a Motorola 68000 CPU (which had a simple,flat 32-bit address space) like the CS-9000, but could not get such a productto market in time, so settled for the Intel 8088, a 16-bit segmentedarchitecture with 8-bit data paths. Worse, it had a primitive 16-lineinterrupt controller, which severely limited the number of devicesthat could be on the bus. The rest is history. I believe that if IBM hadknown that the PC would dominate the next two, three, four, or more decades,it would have invested more time, money, and thought in the original design.

(Obviously the situation is better in the 21st Century. Most of the earlykinks have been ironed out. PCs are cheap and reliable. Any quirks of thearchitecture are well-hidden from end users, and USB makes life immeasurablybetter when devices need to be attached. With Windows the dominantoperating system, the main problems now are performance – bloated OSand applications – and security. And stability.)

Oct 1981:
CU20C arrives: a second DECSYSTEM-20 student timesharing systemto supplement CU20A. Still no common file system; each DEC-20 was arelatively separate world, but at least they were connected by DECnet. If youhad a student user ID, it was on one or the other, not both.
Dec 1981:
HP plotter supplies (personal ink cartridges,etc) were a hot topic in the newsletter. The HP pen plotters installed inMudd (and SSIO?) came in 4- and 8-color models, and there was a wide varietyof software for them, including DISSPLA/TEL-A-GRAF on the DEC-20s andSAS/GRAPH and SPSS on the IBM mainframes that could make 3D plots withhidden-line elimination, fancy fonts, etc. They were totally mechanical:pen and ink on paper, and could produce beautiful line drawings.
Jan 1982:
J. Ray Scott, Director of the Carnegie-Mellon University ComputationCenter, writes an article in the CUCCA Newsletter (V14#1) describing the CCNETconnection between Columbia and CMU, and CMU's facilities (including anARPANET gateeway and various compilers and applications that had not beenlicensed at Columbia). In the first example of network-basedinter-university resource sharing at Columbia, CU users were invitedto apply for user IDs on the CMU systems.
Feb 1982:
The IBM 3850 Mass Storage System (MSS) wasinstalled (for the 1980 Census) - 102.2 GB. The MSS was gigantic in everysense, covering most of the South wall of the machine room. Essentially itwas a big honeycomb, each cell holding a cartridge (PHOTO) that resembles an M-79 rifle grenade (sorry,it does)containing a winding of 2.7-inch-wide magtape with a capacity of 50MB. Amechanical hand comes and extracts the cartridge and carries it to a reader,which removes the shell, and unwinds the tape and copies it to one of fourstaging disks; then the tape is re-wound, the shell replaced, and thecartridge returned to its cell. All this was transparent to the user; the MSSlooked like a 3330 disk drive to user-mode software. The disks acted as acache, so if your file was already on the disk, the little mechanical mandidn't need to go get the cartridge. (Before the MSS, we had an IBM 2321 Data Cell Drive, which worked in a similarway, except instead of cartridges, it used flat strips of tape that were muchharder for the little men to handle, so the tape strips were easily mangled.)Like the 360/91, there were only a few MSS devices in the world.

Enter manual ip address mac. The MSS cost about a million dollars, but Columbia got its MSS in an IBMgrant. In return, Columbia would add support for it to IBM's VM operatingsystem (in particular, it would add windowing and lookahead features to reduce'cylinder faults' and redundant cartridge fetches, and thus speed upsequential access; this was done by Bob Resnikoff of the Computer Center andAtes Dagli of the Center for Social Sciences (CSS)). CSS was responsible forloading the census data (which came on endless reels of 9-track magtape) and for arranging access to it fromwithin Columbia and from outside (V14#16). When the grant expired, Columbiawas able to purchase the MSS at a steep discount.

Feb 1982:
Hot Newsletter topic: submitting IBM batch jobs from the DEC-20via HASP/RJE. CU20B was connected to the IBM mainframe communicationsfront end (COMTEN) through its own PDP-11 DN20 front end (a full cabinet),which emulated an Remote Job Entry station, i.e. a card reader for sendingdata to the mainframe in form of card images, and a line printer for receivingdata from the mainframe in the form of print jobs, but using DEC-20 diskfiles instead of cards and paper. The CUCCA systems groupdeveloped user-friendly programs for submitting batch jobs to the VM systemsfrom the DEC-20 and retrieving the results. These were later to form thebasis of the DEC-20/BITNET mail gateway.
Mar 1982:
RSTS/E retired; RSTS users migrated to DEC-20s, V14#1. The PDP-11/50 was traded for another badly needed RP06 disk drive for our DEC-20s [1]. The PDP-11 with RSTS/E was our first experiment incampuswide public timesharing and it was an unqualified success.
Apr 1982:
BITNET announced (Vace, V14#5).This was a network of IBM mainframes based on RSCS (basically, card reader /line printer simulation) protocols, originating with Ira Fuchs atCUNY, formerly of Watson Lab,and rapidly spreading touniversities all over the world, lasting through the late 1990s, nowremembered mainly for LISTSERV (a distributed automated mailing-listmanagement system). Early members included CUNY, Columbia, Yale, Brown,Princeton, the U of Maine, Penn State, the NJ Educational Network, Boston U,and Cornell University(DIAGRAM).Columbia got the CU prefix (CUVMA, CUVMB), much to the chagrin ofCornell University (CORNELLA, .) Would this be the firstinstance of domain name hijacking? :-) (Twenty years later,the Cornell and Columbia teaching hospitals would merge to form New YorkPresbyterian Hospital; evidently 'Cornell' and 'Columbia' were omitted fromthe name so that neither one would have to follow the other.)
Apr 1982:
IBM Mainframe VM/CMSKermit (Daphne Tzoar). This passed through a number a hands since theinitial release, some of which prefer to remain anonymous, and has been caredfor by Dr. John Chandler at the Harvard/Smithsonian AstronomicalObservatory since about 1990; John made it portable to the other importantIBM mainframe OS's: MVS/TSO, CICS, and MUSIC, and added support for conversionbetween the many IBM EBCDIC Country Extended Code Pages and ISO standardcharacter sets, allowing cross-platform transfer of text in many languages.
May 1982:
Support was added to our e-mail client and server software to takeadvantage of our new CCNET and BITNET connections, and the firstinter-campus e-mail began to flow, limited at first to just a handful ofuniversities, but growing rapidly as CCNET and BITNET nodes are added, andgateways from them to ARPANET, CSNET, and other networks. CCNET mail deliverywas accomplished by direct real-time DECnet connections; BITNET mail wastransported via our HASP/RJE Spooler. Our three DEC-20sused their DECnet connections for mail amongst themselves, as well as withother campus machines and the wider CCNET. CU20A and CU20C and other campusDECnet nodes sent BITNET mail by relaying it over DECnet to CU20B's RJEsystem. In those days, e-mail addresses had to include a 'top-level domain'that indicated the network, e.g. USER@HOST.ARPA,USER@HOST.BITNET, USER@HOST.CCNET, etc. Even trickier wasthe 'source routing' used in Usenet (in those days, a 'network' of UNIX machines that dialed each other up withUUCP periodically to exchange files and mail) and some others, and/or to mailto somebody who was on a network that your host wasn't on, through a relay thatwas on both nets. In such cases you had to know the entire route and thesyntax tricks to traverse each branch of it, and often multiple relays.Here are some examples from the 1980s Kermit mailing list archive:
The last one is broken into two lines for readability; it's really oneline. To get a good feel for the proliferation of networks and the tricksof navigating amongst them in the days before the Internet swept all elseaway, see John Quarterman's book, The Matrix[55]
Jun 1982:
CU20D, our third and final instructional DEC-20, was installed.
Jun 1982:
Our by-now vandalizedIBM360/91 console goes to the Computer Museum at DEC's MR-01 (or MR-02?)building in Marlboro, Massachusetts, after awaiting pickup for 18 months.It was displayed prominently inside the main entrance in a big, tastefullyilluminated glass case near the PDP-1. Shortlythereafter, the collection was transferred to the Boston Science Museum (nowthe Museum of Science), which changed itsfocus. Most of the computing artifacts went to the Computer History Museum,temporarily located at Moffett Field, California (an Air Force base, wherethe 360/91 console sat in 'deep storage' for many years before beingtransferred in about 2001 to deep storage at the Computer History Museum'snew site in Mountain View, California).
Jul 1982:
An Imagen laser printer was installed in Watson; our first laserprinter and our first printer capable of true typesetting. Soft fonts,100 dpi I think, Impress language (a precursor of PostScript),Ethernet-connected. It was only for internal CUCCA use (production ofNewsletter and handouts, etc).
Aug 1982:
The Xerox 9700 (PHOTO) [announced by Xeroxin 1977] arrived, replacing the Xerox 1200 after some overlap (V15#1). The9700 offered the first typesetting to the Columbia community at large, as wellas high-volume, high-speed plain-text printing. This room-sized 300dpiXerographic laser printer was installed in the back of the first floor ofWatson Lab (the present mail and network rooms) due to lack of space in theComputer Center, and it definitely needed the space. It printed 2 pages persecond, could handle duplex, portrait/landscape, 2-up, 4-up, etc, had Courier(fixed) and Helvetica and Times Roman (proportional) fonts, with italic andbold styles and selectable sizes. Formatting was done by Scribe and otherpackages and spooled to 9-track magnetic tapes that were delivered to Watsonevery evening and printed overnight. Xerox 9700 printing was available to allusers (students, faculty, staff, outside paid accounts) on all the DEC-20s andIBM mainframe systems. The DEC-20 Xerox 9700 spooling software ('PRINT/UNIT:X9700') was developed jointly by the combined CUCCA-CMU Systems Groupsover CCNET. Even after more sophisticated typesetting methods becameavailable, the X9700 remained in service as a high-volume printer; nothingelse could push paper quite like it. To this day, I think Controllers andRolmphone statements are still printed on a 9700 at a service bureau.)
Sep 1982:
VMM announced (e-mail for the IBM mainframe: MM for VM, Joel and thenVace).
Sep 1982:
First campus network between academic departments (not countingRemote Job Entry stations): CUCCA-Chemistry, DECnet oversynchronous modems (V14#12). By this time Chemistry had a VAX-11/780 and somesmaller VAXes.
Sep 1982:
TOPS-20 V5 installed on the CUCCA DEC-20s, featuring extended addressing(32 256KW sections = 36MB, instead of only one section), a new multiforkingExec (what we would now call 'job control'), and a programming language forthe Exec (CMU's PCL, what we would now call 'shell scripts'.see example).
Oct 1982:
About here we were looking into getting the AP Newswire online.Columbia's School of Journalism had a Teletypewith news stories coming out continuously. The plan was to feed this intoone of our DEC-20s and make a BBoard out of it, with a rather rapidexpiration of articles given the limited disk storage. But there werelicensing and bureaucratic impediments so it never came to pass. About1990, Columbia bought a subscription to ClariNews (in which the various newsservices are funneled to Usenet newsgroups). This lasted until 2003, bywhich time the Web had long since rendered it redundant.
Nov 1982:
The CUCCA Terminal and Plotter User Manual [14] was published, full of photos and detailedinstructions on using the equipment in our public areas. CLICK HERE to see a sampling of video terminals; notethe accompanying PACX boxes. NOW ON LINE insearchable PDF format. This was printed on our new Xerox 9700, one of thefirst laser printers capable of typesetting; it had two fonts, Helvetica andCourier. The manual itself should interesting to those who harbor a burningcuriosity over every minute detail in the life of President Obama,since the equipment described here is what he must have used when he was aColumbia student 1981-83, because there wasn't anything else. Check, forexample, this article he wrote inSundial Magazine, March 10, 1983. I suspect he composed it on theDEC-20, perhaps in EMACS, seated at one of the terminals in our terminalrooms; for example, the HP-2621s in Carman Hall.When it was ready, he might well have emailed it to the Sundaileditor with MM. Just a guess!
Nov 1982:
DECSYSTEM-20 Pocket Guide (click for PDFof the whole thing). The DEC-20 was an enormously powerful and usefulcomputing system, yet it was simple enought that we could publish anaccordion-fold pocket guide to just about all that it had to offer. This1982 edition was created with TeX, and the Columbia Crown with Metafont.The master was printed on our new Imagen Laser Printerand the printing and folding done at the Columbia print shop. It was givenout free to all comers (thousands of them).
Dec 1982:
The Teachers College DEC-20 connects to the campus DECnet.
1983-1986:
Every Newsletter issue announces new BITNET and DECnet nodes.
Jan 1983
20th Anniversary of the Computer Center.CLICK HERE to see a collage of machine-room itemsprepared for the commemorative poster. The commemorativefrisbee is at ComputerHistory Museum
1 Jan 1983:
The ARPANETswitches from its original protocol, NCP, to TCP/IP. Prior to TCP/IP,the ARPANET was a private club with membership restricted defensecontractors. The fact that some of the defense contractors were also someof the top engineering and computer science universities (MIT, Stanford,CMU, etc) led to a lot of pressure from the non-military segment for moreopen access, and to a new design for the network itself. TCP/IP (TransportControl Protocol / Internet Protocol) was the result. Where ARPANET was anetwork of computers, TCP/IP provided for a network of networks; thatis, an Internet. Thus when the cutover took place, all the computers at agiven university (say, MIT), could be on the net, not just the ones used fordefense research. In this way the network was opened up, and therequirement for a defense contract for membership no longer made sense.Numerous networks such CSNET, NSFNET, and SPAN, were connected. ColumbiaUniversity as a whole got on the net in 1984 by virtue of its connection with NSF and over the next 15years, the network grew to cover the entire planet and membership was opento all.
Jan 1983
The Purchasing Office moves out of the Watsonbuilding and the space is occupied by ADP; now, 13 years after IBM left it,the Watson Lab building is 100% Computer Center and would remain thatway until 1991. ADP begins to offer office automation services, includingPC and LAN installations for administrative use.
Jan 1983:
IBM PC Kermit. Originally by Daphne Tzoar, adapted from BillCatchings' CP/M-80 Kermit (actually, if I recall correctly, Bill did theoriginal translation from 8080 MASM to 8088 Microsoft assembler in a singleEMACS session, and then Daphne made it work and added features). Later itpassed to Jeff Damens. We did versions 1.00 to 2.28 here, with variouspieces contributed from elsewhere.ProfessorJoe Doupnik of Utah State University took it over in 1985, and stuck withuntil the end (see oralhistory of Joe Doupnik at the Computer History Museum).We were actually ordered to write this program because severalprominent professors (Herb Goldstein, Bob Pollack, and Jonathan Gross)were using their new PCs to write a book,The Scientific Experience,that would be used in a new course, Science C1001-1002,Theory and Practiceof Science, in Columbia'sContemporary Civilization (the jewel in the crown of the Columbia CollegeCoreCurriculum) and wanted to be able to collaborate by uploading chapters toCU20B, where they could be shared. And they did. MS-DOS Kermit was a fixtureon the Columbia computing landscape until the Web took over in 1994-95,and popular all over the world. It's still remarkably popular today,providing VT320, Wyse, DG, ANSI, and Tektronix terminal emulation for Linuxunder dosemu, as well as data transfer for many DOS-based embeddedand experimental devices, such as THIS ONE in the InternationalSpace Station. CLICK HEREto visit the MS-DOS Kermit website.
Jan 1983:
Amdahl UTS installed on the IBM mainframe as a virtual machine under VM(Alan); this was the first UNIX on the central systems. But CS,Biology, and P&S had been running other forms of UNIX for some time ondepartmental minicomputers such as PDP-11s and VAX-11/750s.

(9-track magnetic tapes were big in these days,but every kind of computer used a different format: ANSI, DUMPER, BACKUP,MAGSAV, IBM OS SL, tar, cpio, etc, so writingtapeimport/export/conversion utilities was a regular cottage industry.)

Mar 1983:
CCNET included CU, CMU, CWRU, CS, TC.
Mar 1983:
All but two key punches removed due to lack of use (V15#4). The SSIO areais now a mainly a public terminal area, CUCCA business office, and consultingfacility.
Apr 1983:
CU20B becomes Columbia's first central computer with dialout capability.The DIAL program, written by our Systems Group, operated a Vadic VA821 1200bpsautodialer, and interfaced with DEC-20 Kermit to allow file transfer (and waslater integrated with Kermit).
18 May 1983:
DECSYSTEM-20 (and DECsystem-10) 36-bit computer line canceled by DECdue to their failed attempts to produce a faster and cheaper followon product(Jupiter). This was a huge blow to Columbia and most other US universities,which until this point were like a big (but increasingly anxious) DEC-10/20club. The ARPANET had been built mainly on DEC-10s and -20s, andmost computer science research and tools ran there. Big changes would come.

Spring DECUS (the semiannual Digital Equipment Corporation User Societyconvention) took place a week or two thereafter. Ip changer free mac. At the June 2001 DECWORLD eventat the Computer Museum HistoryCenter, Roseanne Giordano, DEC's LCG [DEC-10 and DEC-20] product linemanager at the time of the cancellation, recalled that DECUS organizers,fearing violence from the crowd, installedplainclothes police in the front row to protect the speakers.

Jun 1983:
Snapshot: Public terminal, printer, and graphics equipment.Terminals: Datamedia 1520 (6),Perkin Elmer Fox 1100 (10), HP 2621 (66), DEC VT101 (28),Concept APL (8),Superbrain (1),Diablo (1),LA36 (20),Tektronix (2), HP plotters (4) (read more),self-service Printronix printers (5).Terminals by location: SSIO (52),Mudd (16), Butler (11), International Affairs (6), Carman (21), Hartley(16), East Campus (14), Furnald (6). The Superbrain is still the onlydesktop computer in a public area; it remained in service until at least1986.
Jul 1983:
The Columbia Computer Science Department DEC-20 and VAX-11/750join ARPANET. The CS DEC-20 is connected to CU20B with DECnet,thus providing the first ARPANET access from CUCCA machines (staff only).
Nov 1983:
We attend nondisclosure presentations of the Macintosh, which as to bethe first mass-market personal computer with a graphical user interface,modeled on that of theXeroxAlto and theXeroxStar (the Star was commercially available in 1981 but it was tooexpensive for the popular market). I recommend early adoption of theMacintosh by CU; this was done and Columbia became one of the first membersof the Apple University Consortium, buying them in bulk and reselling themto students.
Nov 1983:
We (I) take on responsibility of approving campus microcomputer purchases,since in those days there were countless different incompatible ones. Everyrequisition had to come across my desk; if it was for something weird I'd callthe person who ordered it and talk about communications and compatibility,either changing their mind or rubber stamping it after they swore they didn'tcare and never would.
Dec 1983:
Apple Macintosh announced.
1983-84:
It is in approximately this time frame that Alan Crosswell becomes LeadUnix Systems Programmer and also assumes management responsibility for theDEC-20s, as I move on to something called 'Systems Integration', meaningfinding ways of hooking Columbia's many disparate micro-, mini-, and mainframecomputers together. Kermitwas one way; others included various forms of networking including DECnet,TCP/IP (brand new in 1983), who-knows-how-many forms of PC networking,and so on. Alan is formally appointed Systems Manager in 1990.
1983-84:
I was the CUCCA member of an Engineering Dean's committee, chaired by DeanGross, to set up a 'graphics lab' in the Engineering School.Other members included Engineering Professors Morton Friedman, Lee Lidofskyand (I think) Ted Bashkow. Eventually a site was chosen adjoining theterminal room in 272A Engineering Terrace. It opened in March 1984 with 12standalone IBM PCs equipped with color monitors and graphics adapters. Thiswas almost certainly Columbia's first PC lab. The graphics lab wasturned over to CUCCA in October 1989, combined with the original lab in room272A, and renamed Gussman Lab.
Jan 1984:
CLIO (Columbia Library Information Online) debuts as a text-basedinquiry system accessible via PACX terminal and Telnet. It is based onBLIS software from Bibliotechniques (a spinoff of the University ofWashington), and runs on our IBM 3083 mainframe.
Feb 1984:
Hermit ('clustered PC project'): a3-million-dollar equipment grant from DEC, proposed by us (me and HowardEskin) in March 1983, to build a distributed environment of Macs, PCs, andUNIX workstations clustered around MicroVAX hubs which, in turn, were connectedto the central DEC-20 mainframes for file / identity / e-mail service.Included were dozens of Rainbow PCs and Pro-380(PDP-11) workstations, several MicroVAX-IIs, a VAX 11/730, a VAX 11/750, aVAXstation, an LN03 laser printer, Ethernet, and the Common File System(shared disk) hardware for our DEC-20s including a then-massive amount ofcentral storage. This was to be a stunning example of 'systems integration;'the primary objective was to provide users transparentnative-mode access to their central files and identities from all differentkinds of desktop workstations (PC, Mac, UNIX). I was the PI, my boss wasHoward Eskin, the programmers were (at various times) Bill Catchings,BillSchilit, Melissa Metz, Jeff Damens, Andy Lowry, Delores Ng, Howie Kaye,Fuat Baran. (V16#2, V16#6, V18#2; Columbia Daily Spectator, 23 Apr1984).
Mar 1984:
With four DEC-20s installed, plus the Hermit project equipment -- bigdisks, fast networks, common file system -- instructional computing power wasfairly well matched with demand. Now access was the bottleneck. A study bythe Academic Advisory Committee of the Engineering Advisory Council,Computers in Columbia Engineering Education, March 1984,complained of 'the Sleeping Bag Syndrome: students should not be forced toline up for terminal time at graveyard shift hours.' Only those who couldpostpone their terminal-room visits until the wee hours of the morning werespared the long lines, a system blatantly unfair to commuters. Obtainingspace for terminal rooms (or anything else) on the Columbia campus was (andis) even more difficult than obtaining the money to build them. Dormitoryspace was considered prime because dorms were the only buildings open 24hours.
Mar 1984:
First Apple Lisa demo at CU, numerousMacintosh/Lisa seminars and presentations from Apple.
Apr 1984:

Sode Es Informatica Mac Manual Integracion Index 2017

IBM Portable PC announced by CUCCA for resale.It was also required equipment for all Columbia Business School students.
Apr-May 1984:
Macintosh mania. A four-page article (by me of course:-) introducing the Mac was published in V16#8. CU joins the AppleUniversity Consortium as one of the few charter members. AUC membershiprequired us to buy Macs in bulk for resale on campus. 2000 were ordered rightaway. Within a short while, we had written the first version of Macintosh Kermit for it (Bill Catchings, Bill Schilit, andme). Mac (and PC) sales continue in one form or another until turned over toJ&R, which opened a Columbia-only branch in the basement of PhilosophyHall in the late 1990s but then jumped ship about 2001.
May 1984:
Floor plan of DEC-20 machine room byBill Schilitof the Systems Group, showing the size and placement of the various components(3 DEC-20s, their disk drives, and communications front ends are shown; notshown is the fourth DEC-20, the tape drives, or the system consoles).OK, this is not really the floor plan. It's a template for making floorplans. The idea was to gather up all the discarded copies of the newsletterthat had this diagram on the cover, cut out the pieces, and then make a realfloor plan out of them (Tom De Bellis points out this diagram was madebefore all the Hermit grant stuff had arrived, thus was used to lay outhow to make everything fit).Also see THIS DEC-20 MACHINE ROOM PHOTO.
Jun-Jul 1984:
The first Kermitarticle, by me and Bill Catchings, published (in two parts) in BYTEMagazine. SeeKermit Bibliographyfor more Kermit-related publications.
3 Aug 1984:
CU20B joins ARPANET (now called the Internet). Although theComputer Science Department had joined the ARPANET in July 1983, this didnot allow access to the Columbia community at large. Putting CU20B on theARPANET was the first step in this direction (researchers from all schoolsand departments and CUCCA staff only, not students).CU20B's ARPANET hostname was COLUMBIA.ARPA. No other Columbia computers(except the ones in the CS department) were on the ARPANET, but of courseCU20B had network connections to the other DEC-20s, some internal CUCCAmachines, the campus DECnet and the external DECnet-based CCNET, and toBITNET. Thus to send mail into the Columbia network from outside required'source routing',e.g. user%CU20A@COLUMBIA.ARPA. For some years, CU20B was to serveas a mail gateway among these networks, using locally written software.Over thenext year or two, CUCCA would purchase a VAX-11/750, called the Gateway VAX,and install it in the CS department, where it was connected to the CSARPANET IMP and back to the CUCCA hosts via Ethernet. The Gateway VAX ran4.2BSD UNIX and it made Internet e-mail available to the wholeColumbia community, including students, for the first time. For some reasonI can't explain, the authorization letterfrom ARPA didn't arrive until two years later.
Aug 1984:
IBM PC/AT announced, the first IBM PC with memory protection. Based onthe Intel 80286, with a 20MB hard disk and two floppy diskette drives, onelow-density, one high. Battery powered BIOS configuration memory and clock.Up to 16MB memory. This was the first in the IBM PC line fully capable ofrunning multitasking operating systems, and soon was host to a number ofthem (some companies had managed to produce Unix variants such as Xenix forthe original IBM PC or XT on 8086 but these were not 'sustainable'.) Ofcourse this machine was of great interest to the Columbia Computer Center,which was looking for ways to deploy desktop networked UNIX workstationsfor academic use, and we had some internally running different UNIX versionssuch as SCO Xenix/286. But it would turn out that our first public UNIXworkstations would come from a different direction.
Sep 1984:
Three HP-150 MS-DOS microcomputers and oneMacintosh were installed in the 272A Engineering Terrace terminal room.They were not on any kind of network and had to be reserved by sign-upsheet. The HP-150s were an equipment grant from HP, along with some colorpen plotters that were attached to them. They had touch-screens andintegrated thermal printers. A version of Kermit was written to allow themto communicate with the central computers through PACX lines and transferfiles to and from their 3.5-inch diskettes (the HP-150 was one of the first,if not the first PC to use the 3.5-inch rigid diskette). Graphicimages where generated by software on the mainframes (such asDISSPLA/TELEGRAF on the DEC-20s and SASGRAPH on the IBMs), downloaded withKermit, and sent to the plotters.
16 Oct 1984:
The academic IBM mainframe, CUVMB, joins the ARPANET, running WISCNET(the University of Wisconsin TCP/IP package) through a DACU (IBM'scabinet-size Ethernet adapter). This machine was for researchers and staffonly, so there is still no ARPANET access for students.
Nov 1984:
Project Aurora, a 6.5-million dollar IBM grant administered byCUCCA, a 'campus-wide move in information and instruction toward theelectronic university.' Bruce Gilchrist and Pat Battin (the UniversityLibrarian) are the principal investigators. Aurora paid for an IBM 3083mainframe to support the Columbia Libraries Information Online (CLIO) system,and also funded some 30 research projects in the schools and departments.
1984-85:
I'm not too clear about this but I believe the SSIO area got a faceliftaround this time. See these photos.
1985:
Low-cost Apple Laserwriter PostScript printers proliferate and suddenlytypesetting becomes commonplace as LaserWriters are set up as spooledprinters so they can be controlled not only by Macintoshes but also DEC-20 andUNIX systems with Scribe and TEX.
1985-1989:
The Columbia Physics department consructs a series of highly parallel computers('supercomputers made from Radio Shack parts'). 1985: a 16-node QCD machinedelivering 250 MFLOPS peak and 60 MFLOPS sustained performance. 1987: Asecond-generation QCD machine containing 64 nodes, delivering 1 GFLOPS peakand 300 MFLOPS sustained performance. 1989: A third-generation QCD machinecontaining 256 nodes delivering 16 GFLOPS peak and 6.4 GFLOPS sustainedperformance [43]. This work would continueinto the 1990s and beyond.
Jan 1985:
CUVMA (IBM VM/CMS academic mainframe) gets Ethernet (DACU) and TCP/IP(WISCNET) (Vace).
Jan 1985:
Internet Domain Name registration begins. Some of the first registereddomains are: symbolics.com, cmu.edu, bbn.com, ucla.edu, mit.edu, mitre.org,dec.com, stanford.edu, sri.com, sun.com, ibm.com, att.com, nsf.net, apple.com,cisco.com.
Feb 1985:
First version of C-Kermit (4.0)released. (Previous versions were called UNIX Kermit; C-Kermit wasmodularized to allow easy adaptation to other platforms, and eventually wasported to over 700 of them, across 10 major operating system families.)Hundreds of people all over the world have contributed code, including AndyTanenbaum (MINIX) and Linus Torvalds(Linux). C-Kermit waspart of Hewlett-Packard's UNIX operating system HP-UX (by contract) from1996 until 2011 (when Columbia U canceled the Kermit Project), and has sincebeen incorporated into many of the free Open Source operating systemsdistributions. CLICKHERE to visit the C-Kermitwebsite. CLICKHERE to see a very early version C-Kermit. Speaking of Andy Tanenbaumand MINIX,CLICKHERE to read Andy's 2016 article, Lessons Learned from 30 Years ofMINIX [121] (complete with video)!
May 1985:
Watson Lab Ethernet connection to Computer Center; Steve Jensen's 115thStreet trench and Broadway crossing with cement-encased conduits containingfat yellow coax, the difficult Western and final leg of Columbia's firstEthernet backbone (PHOTO GALLERY). Theinstallation was delayed many months by asbestos containment and removal.Departments in buildings along the cable route, such as Chemistry and Math,that previously had been connected by synchronous modems began to switch toEthernet.
Sep 1985:
The COLUMBIA.EDU Internet domain becomes operational. Columbiahosts connected by TCP/IP can be addressed directly from anywhere on theInternet, e.g. by email addresses like user@CU20D.COLUMBIA.EDU oruser@CHEMVAX.CHEM.COLUMBIA.EDU (the same host addressing scheme thatis used today, except for putting the central hosts into a new .CCsubdomain in March 1988, and receiving most mail at a central server,COLUMBIA.EDU, rather than by individual computer host name). For the firsttime, students have access to the Internet but for all practical purposes,it is limited to email and anonymous FTP, since the World Wide Web does notyet exist and netnews will not become generally available at Columbia until1988. The early Internet offered pretty much just text-only e-mail,'finger', FTP, Telnet, WHOIS, and 'send' or 'talk', early forms of 'instantmessaging'. What else could you want?
Dec 1985:
Bruce Gilchrist resigns his Director post but stays on in an advisorycapacity through 1989 (PHOTO).
Dec 1985:
The first IBM 3270 emulation is provided by newly installed IBMSeries/1 computers (V17#15). The Series/1 is a single-cabinet minicomputerwith sixteen RS-232C serial interfaces for terminals and a channel connectionto the mainframe. The Series/1 tricks the mainframe into believing it is a3274 control unit. Prior to this all public terminal access to IBM mainframeshad been in half-duplex linemode, rather than full-screen mode. Now ordinaryASCII terminals (and emulators of them) could conduct full-screen 3270sessions on the IBM VM/CMS mainframe, and they could do it withoutreconfiguration (as was necessary for linemode connections). The Series/1converted between full and half duplex, block mode and character mode, and IBM3270 data streams and the escape sequences and character sets used by manydifferent types of terminals (even APL terminals), plus it provided flowcontrol and buffering. The Series/1 computers were later replaced by IBM7171s, 4994s, and tn3270 software in terminal servers and on UNIX hosts.

(Around here, large departmental PC labs began to appear, for examplein the Business School and in the Learning Center.)

1986-1987
West German hackers use Columbia's Kermit software to break intodozens of US military computers and capture information for the KGB, asdescribed by Cliff Stoll in his 1989 book, The Cuckoo's Egg [46]. At one point, while Cliffwatched on a jury-rigged T-connected terminal, the hackers were using Kermitto download a copy of the Telnet source code so they could implant apassword logger, upload the result, recompile it, and install it: 'Line byline, I watched Kermit shovel the program over to the hacker. But Icouldn't just kill Kermit. He'd notice that right away. Now that I wasclosing in on him, I especially didn't want to tip my hand. I found my keychain and reached over to the wires connected to the hacker's line.Jangling the keys across the connector, I shorted out his circuit for aninstant. This added just enough noise to confuse the computer, but notenough to kill the connection. It worked like a charm. I'd jangle mykeys, he'd see the noise, and his computer would ask for a replay of thelast line.' This slowed the transfer down so much that the hackereventually lost patience and gave up -- but it didn't stop Kermit! As longas the connection stays up, no matter how awful, Kermit pushes the filethrough. Cliff also measured the delay between Kermit packet andacknowledgment to estimate the hacker's distance from California (6000miles, a fairly accurate estimate of the distance to Hannover).
1 Jan 1986:
CUCCA and Libraries merge. Information is information, right?(V18#2). CUCCA now reports to the University Librarian, Pat Battin.(In fact, it seems that CUCCA and Libraries merge periodically;in some sense, CUCCA has always reported to the University Librarian; inanother sense the real merger came only later, under Elaine Sloan.)The administrative half of CUCCA, ADP (now AIS, Administrative InformationServices), is severed and reports toLow Library, and eventually (1991) moves from Watson Lab to Thorndike Hall atTeachers College.
Jan 1986:
Columbia's first networked PC lab opensin 251 Engineering Terrace, populated with the UNIX (Pro/380), MS-DOS (Rainbow) and VAX workstations from the Hermit grant, plus eight 512K ('fat') Macintoshes and twoMac/XLs, a LaserWriter printing station, an IBM PC, and the original KermitSuperbrain (V18#2). The Pro/380 was a workstation made by DEC with a PDP-11 inside. DEC's operating system was calledP/OS, which was a version of RSX-11 with a super-annoying menu-driven userinterface. We adapted 2.8BSD UNIX to the machine for use in the lab, sothese were the first public Unix workstations deployed at Columbia.Furthermore, unlike the Rainbows, Macs, and the PC (which communicated onlythrough their serial ports with Kermit), they were on Ethernet, andtherefore on the Internet.
Jan 1986:
Kermit Project founded. Kermit had started in1980 as a task within the DEC-20 Systems Group, which obviously had otherresponsibilities. By the mid-80s, Kermit had become popular all over theworld, and we were receiving hundreds of requests for it every week from sitesthat were not on the network. Meanwhile, other sites were sending in newKermit implementations of their own. Fulfilling these requests andmaintaining the Kermit software archive (and mailing list, etc) had become afull-time job, so a full-time Kermit group, led by Christine Gianone (formerlythe business manager in SSIO), was created to manageand distribute the software and take over the online archive, the mailinglists, tech support, and so on. The programming was still done by members ofthe Systems group and external volunteers. Software distribution charges wereinstituted to cover costs. The old raised-floor machine room in the back ofthe 7th floor of Watson Lab (added in 1959 for the IBM 1620) became theKermit room, containing the Kermit Project computers andmedia production equipment.
May 1986:
The height of CCNET, which now includes Columbia, CMU, CWRU, NYU,Stevens, Vassar, and Oberlin (V18#5). An October 1986 listing shows about 200'nodes' on the network with DEC operating systems including TOPS-10, TOPS-20,VMS, Ultrix, RSX-11/M, and P/OS. Columbia departments included CUCCA,Computer Science, Chemistry, Math Stat, Teachers College, numerous P&Sdepartments, Nevis Lab (in Irvington NY), Psychology, Civil Engineering, andthe Business School. Other universities (mainly in Ohio) would join later,but in a few more years the Internet would make CCNET obsolete.
May 1986:
First public description of Columbia's Ethernet backbone network, andenunciation of policy for departmental connections to it (V18#5), which wasaccomplished by us writing a letter for the Provost to sign.
Jul 1986:
First issue of Kermit News.
16 Jul 1986:
Columbia University as a whole (as opposed to only the ComputerScience Department) receives approval from the Defense Projects ResearchAgency to join the ARPANET (which would soon become the Internet)[SEE LETTER].
Aug 1986:
Mathematics joins Ethernet backbone.
1986:(month?)
Richard Sacks takes over as acting CUCCA Director.(Howard leaves somewhere in here.)
Sep 1986:
The Scholarly Information Center (SIC) is proclaimed by Pat Battin,University Librarian.
Sep 1986:
More about the campus backbone:'A bright yellow half-inch coaxial cable runs throughthe steam tunnels up and across the west and north edges of the Morningsidecampus. This cable is the campus Ethernet backbone, a large part of which wasinstalled as part of an external research grant from Digital EquipmentCorporation [the Hermit Project].' (Alan Crosswell,Networks at Columbia, SIC Journal V1#1, Sep 1986).The backboneran from Watson Lab to Mathematics to Chemistry to the Computer Center toComputer Science to Mudd (DIAGRAM).At the time coax-based IBM PCNET and Token Ring PC networkswere commonplace networking methods for PCs.
Oct 1986:
Kermit,A File Transfer Protocol (Frank) published by Digital Press,with a Foreword byDonald Knuth. It remained in print for 14 years.
Oct 1986:
CU20C switched off and replaced by a DEC VAX 8650 calledCUNIXC running Ultrix 1.1, DEC's brand of UNIX, a 4.2BSDderivative. A pilot project assigned some CS courses to CUNIXC in Fall 1986.This was our first step in phasing out the DEC-20s after the line wasdiscontinued by DEC in 1983. This stung so severely that we would never run aproprietary operating system again (except on the IBM mainframes, of course).The attraction of UNIX was that it was available -- with relatively minorvariations -- on all kinds of computers, great and small. The 8650 wasapproximately equal to the DEC-20 in size, weight, and cost; it was chosenbecause we could recycle many of the DEC-20 peripherals, and because (unlikeother UNIXes) it supported DECnet, which we still used for departmentalconnections. Lots moreHERE about theconversion from TOPS-20 to Unix.

(About UNIX. There is much that appeals about UNIX. Its well-knownoriginal attributes (simplicity, terseness, consistent building-block tools)were spelled out in the seminal BSTJ issue [15]. Inaddition, it is platform independent, so sites like ours are not tied to aparticular vendor. Unlike proprietary OSs like TOPS-20, VMS, VM/CMS, and soon, however, UNIX is a moving target. Ever since control of UNIX left BellLabs, every implementation (Ultrix, OSF/1, AIX, HP-UX, SunOS, Solaris, IRIX,Linux, FreeBSD, etc etc) is different in sometimes subtle but alwaysaggravating ways, and (with a few notable exceptions such as OpenBSD) everynew release of every varation tends to break existing applications (whereasprograms written for TOPS-20, VMS, MVS/TSO, or VM/CMS decades ago stillwork, without even recompiling). Any program more complicated than 'helloworld' is rarely portable from one UNIX to another without some 'porting'work at the source-code level. To compound matters, documentation isincreasingly scant. In the 1970s and 80s, every operating system (evenUNIX) came with a 'wall' of printed manuals that documented everything inexcruciating detail. But now documentation is considered a waste of timeand effort, since everything will change anyway. In modern UNIX, the onlyreliable documentation is the source code, and even that decays over time.)

Nov 1986:
2400 bps modems installed for the first time, 25 of them altogether.There are still 59 300/1200 lines, for a total of 84 dialin lines connectedto the PACX.
Dec 1986:
First IBM RT PCs received at Watson Lab (V18#12). This was IBM's firstRISC Technology (RT) UNIX workstation, the precursor to the RS/6000, whichwas in wide use at Columbia and elsewhere into the 2000s. IBM's brand ofUNIX is called AIX.
Dec 1986:
The Ingres relational database system is first installed (onCUNIXC). This would become the basis for CU's ID and authentication systemsand other UNIX-based databases.
1987:
Snapshot: The 1987 edition of the CUCCA Guide to Research andInstructional Facilities lists four DEC-2065's (but only three remain),the IBM mainframe with VM/CMS, a DEC VAX 8700 running Ultrix, 150 publicterminals (HP2621s and DECVT101s) plus DEC Rainbows and Apple Macintoshesin public labs, 80 dialup lines at 300, 1200, and 2400 bps. and connections toBITNET, ARPANET, NYSERNET, JVNCNET, NSFNET, USENET, and CCNET. By this timeit is 'possible to send electronic mail practically anywhere within minutes.'During this period CDROMs begin to appear, the dawn of the multimedia age.CLIO goes online to PACX users. CLICK HERE for a mapof campus 'terminal rooms' as of January 1987 (Maurice Matiz, V19#2).
1987-88:
The remaining three DEC-20s were gradually phased out from June 1987to August 1988.
1987-88:
The Kermit Project gives presentations at internationalconferences in the USA, Switzerland, France, andJapan. In Japan we learned the problems of Japanesetext entry, coding, display, and interchange that would influence futuredirections in Kermit protocol and software.
Jan 1987:
Morningside campus is connected to the John von Neumann SupercomputerCenter in Princeton and to JVNCNET via a 56Kb leased line. And to NYSERNETvia 56Kb leased line to Cornell. The Big Snowball Fight.
Feb 1987:
Biology joins Ethernet backbone.
Feb 1987:
CUCCA (Frank) commissions Sparc SPITBOL due to imminent demise ofDEC-20s (indicating we had already decided on Sun for future expansion;SPITBOL (SNOBOL), which some of us still used heavily, was one of the fewDEC-20 applications that had not been adapted to UNIX in general or the Sparcin particular).
Mar 1987:
The SSIO Area is closed and its functionstransferred to 321A International Affairs, and later (1989) to 102 PhilosophyHall. The SSIO terminal rooms are replaced by public labs in theInternational Affairs building (and later in other locations) in whichmicrocomputers, PCs, Macintoshes, and other kinds of workstations areinstalled rather than terminals.
Apr 1987:
Hermit project canceled. Although we had achieved many of its goals(transparent central file access from DOS, Mac, and UNIX; shared printing,including graphics; even e-mail), it was overtaken by cheap Ethernet, NFS, andcommodity LANs/internetworking in general. Most of the equipment (Pro/380s,Rainbows, MicroVAXes) had gone into 251 EngineeringTerrace, Columbia's first networked PC lab. ThePro-380s were our first public UNIX workstations (running 2.9BSD, adaptedlocally to the Pro-380), andCCMD (DEC-20 COMND JSYSsimulation in C for UNIX)and the UNIX version of MM(mail client) came out of it (more info on MMHERE). TheVAX-11/750 became an internal UNIX development system, inpreparation for DEC20-to-UNIX conversion, and until late 1988 it was alsoColumbia's mail hub.
May 1987:
The Engineering School Ethernet (Muddnet) is installed and connected tothe campus Ethernet backbone. Muddnet came from an AT&T grant to theSchool of Engineering and Applied Science (SEAS), which also included anAT&T 3B20 minicomputer in the Computer Science department and a largenumber of 3B2 desktop workstations, all running AT&T UNIX System V R3.The 3Bx's fell into disuse after after a short while, but the Ethernet tapswere recycled and used to provide connectivity for years.
Jun 1987:
CU20A switched off.
Jul 1987:
VAX 8700 up as CUNIXC, replacing the VAX 8650.
Sep 1987:
U of Toledo (Ohio) joins CCNET.
Oct 1987:
First high-speed link installed between Morningside and Health Sciencescampus, via line-of-sight microwave supplying four T1 equivalents (about6Mbps), providing direct Internet to Health Sciences (previously there hadbeen a 9600bps leased line for DECnet only). This works because theMorningside and Health Sciences campus are both on Manhattan high points(see the old aerial photo).
Nov 1987:
The Physics Department joins the Ethernet backbone.
Nov 1987:
Columbia Appletalk Package (CAP) and Appletalk UNIX File Server(AUFS) released, written byBill Schilit and Charlie Kim of Watson Lab,provides Appleshare file and print service to Macintoshes from UNIX, speakingAppletalk over Ethernet (V19#9). CAP and AUFS quickly became popular all overthe world and Charlie went on to work at Apple.
1987-1993:
Network Planning Group (NPG): University-wide planning sessionssetting networking direction and policy for CU as a whole (Morningside andHealth Sciences, Administrative and Academic), chaired by me. Met weeklyuntil 1993. Began by planning for Rolm installation (wiring plant, PACX/Rolmdata migration), eventually moved on to local-area, campus-wide, and wide-areanetworking in general. Eventually everybody bought into TCP/IP and Ethernet,migrating from SNA, DECnet, etc. [See the NPG final report (PDF)].
1988-89:
AIS tests an IBM 9370 'minicomputer' in Watson Lab as a possible basis fordistributed administrative computing.
Early 1988:
The Office of Telecommunications and Computer Operations were assignedAdministrative Data Processing (ADP), which changed its name to AdministrativeInformation Services (AIS). AIS was removed from CUCCA, and now reported tothe University's central administration, rather than to the UniversityLibrarian, thus ending the 17-year CUCCA name and era. The academic andadministrative staff, however, continued to work together in Watson Lab [20]. The Office of Telecommunications has overallresponsibility for the Rolm phone system including the Rolm cable plant. Thesplit complicates the networking of the University, since some aspects (wiringand distribution frames) are done by Telecomm, whereas others (backbonenetwork, hubs, routers, and configuration) are done by the Academic portion ofex-CUCCA (soon to be AcIS), and the two sides do not report anywhere in commonshort of the President. Working around this structural anomoly was theprimary reason for NPG. Meanwhile, the central academic computing systemsremain in the machine room but now AIS is the service provider (of operationssupport) and AcIS the client.
Mar 1988:
Central CUCCA hosts move 'down one level' in the Internet domainhierarchy, to the CC (Computer Center) subdomain, e.g. CU20B.COLUMBIA.EDUbecomes CU20B.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU. The older names remain in effect untilthe first of June.
Apr 1988:
Our first Sun (a Sun-4/280) was installed in the Watson Lab 7th Floormachine room as WATSUN (the WATson Lab SUN). Watsun (later upgraded toSparc-10 and then Sparc-20), which ran SunOS 4.0 and 4.1 (4.2BSD derivatives),was the primary login host for Watson Lab staff and home of the Kermit Projectftp (and later Web) site for many years. Later (when?) it would moveto the Watson Penthouse as the need for office spacebecomes increasingly urgent, and the old IBM raised-floormachine room would be gutted and divided into four offices for 6-8 people.Watsun was retired in 2003.
May 1988:
CU20D switched off. All instruction moved from DEC-20s to VAXUNIX. CU20B (research and staff) runs until . . .
Aug 1988:
CU20B (Columbia's last DEC-20) was switched off. For moreabout the legacy of the DECSYSTEM-20, CLICKHERE. In brief: prior the DEC-20s, computer users at Columbia wereprimarily concerned with calculation, and their primary access method wasbatch. After the DEC-20 (and because of it) they were hooked on e-mail,bulletin boards, 'talk' (interactive real-time chatting), text editing andtypesetting, and the Internet -- just as they are today. The nature ofcomputing had changed completely and forever. All that remained was to put apretty face on it.
Aug 1988:
Lamont Doherty Geological Observatory connected to Morningside campus viaEthernet over T1.
Aug 1988:
Ethernet backbone extended to East Campus.
Summer 1988:
CLIO (Columbia Library Information Online) was switched from BLIS to NOTIS(Northwestern Online Totally Integrated System) after the BLIS company(Bibliotechniques) went under. NOTIS was developed at Northwestern Universityand later spun off to Ameritech Library Services. CLIO continues to runon the IBM mainframe.
Sep 1988:
CUCCA reorganization. Richard Sacks officially director. Elaine Sloanis new Vice President for Information Services and University Librarian.
Sep 30, 1988:
25th Anniversary of the Columbia Computer Center Symposium. Ken King,Vladimir Ussachevsky, Ted Bashkow, Cy Levinthal, Jessica Gordon, RobertGoldberger, Norman Mintz, Elaine Sloan, Dorothy Marshall, Paul Clayton,Robert Wedgeworth, Ira Fuchs, Richard Sacks. Horace Mann Auditorium,Teachers College, 10:00am-5:00pm. Materials (courtesy of Stew Feuerstein):
  • History of Administrative Data Processingby Nuala Hallinan
Nov 1988:
After years of planning and a year of installation, the AT&T Centrextelephone system and the Gandalf PACX were replaced by IBM/Rolm (laterSiemens) CBX 9000 (PHOTOS). Now instead of aPACX box and a phone, users had a phone with an RS-232connector (if they paid extra for the 'data option'). This was a massiveproject involving untold amounts of construction, tunneling, drilling, andwire-pulling, including a trench across Broadway and many trenches between thebuildings on campus and across side streets. Preparation for the cutover wasdone using a Rolm CBX 8000 in Watson Lab. 2500 data connections were movedfrom the PACX to the Rolm. Columbia's telephone exchange was changed from280- to 853- and 854-. Christine and I published a series of articles inMcGraw Hill Data Communications magazine on the topic and NeilSachnoff wrote a whole book [41]. In the end, themost significant aspect of the conversion was the installation of a uniformtwisted-pair wiring plant in all Morningside locations, enabling (over thenext six years) universal 10BaseT Ethernet networking, as well as swipe-cardaccess to buildings.
Prior to 1988, the Columbia University ID (CUID) was paper. With the Rolmsystem came laminated picture IDs with magnetic strips that worked inswipe-card readers all over campus, as well as in off-campus universitybuildings -- anyplace reached by Rolm wiring. The same wiring system thatwas used for telephones, serial-port terminal connections, and twisted-pairEthernet was also used to connect to the central access server that lets youopen doors.

Prior to this, PACX data installations required pulling wire from the PACX toeach destination, digging trenches, drilling holes through granite, etc, andcould take many months. With the CBX, it was just a matter of making somecross-connections in a distribution panel -- every phone jack was also anetwork jack. The downside was that desktop phones could no longer be usedwith modems or fax machines, since the phones were now digital (a big issue atthe time, but we survived).

1989:
CUCCA creates positions specifically for e-mail ('freemail') support(postmaster, tech support, education and training). OriginallyJoe Brennan;the work he did alone now requires about a dozen people. Freemail islaunched January 1990. Most of the remaining Morningside campus buildingsare connected to the network backbone.
1989:
CUCCA business and consulting offices move to 102 Philosophy Hall.This is the same room where Prof. Edwin H. Armstrong invented FM radio. Here we have twoviews of Armstrong's laboratory in 102 Philosophy in the 1930s[VIEW 1] [VIEW 2]and one of the Armstrong Tower(from the Columbiana photo archive).The Armstrong Tower (transmitterfor the first-ever FM radio station, W2XMN, 1936) is across the Hudson River inAlpine, New Jersey, but at some point Columbia sold it off. Later (early1990s) we thought we might use it for microwave access to Lamont, since it hasline-of-sight to both Columbia's Morningside Heights (Manhattan) campus and toLamont in Palisades NY, but couldn't afford the new owner's rates. (Actuallythis idea has come up just about every 10 years since the 1960s -- I saw itfirst suggested in Dean Halford's 1963 letter [36].)After the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, theArmstrong tower was used again by the major networks to broadcast theirsignals [56].
Apr 1989:
An Encore Multimax 310 UNIX mainframe (later upgraded to 510) replaces theVAX 8700, our first departure from DEC for big academic central computerssince 1975. The Encore's attraction was its multiple processors. It wasfast. Its UNIX (UMAX) was based on 4.3BSD. This change effectivelyremoves the Computer Center from the campus DECnet, which gradually vanishedfrom the scene over the next 10 or 12 years.
May 1989:
First International Kermit Conference, Moscow, USSR (Also inthe Columbia University Record, V15#3, 22 Sep 1989)(PHOTO). Attended by Frank da Cruz andChristine Gianone of the Columbia Computer Center and about 70 computerspecialists from Bulgaria, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, East Germany,Mongolia, Poland, and parts of the USSR ranging from Novosibirsk in centralRussia to Tallinn in Estonia, this is where the details of Kermit'scharacter-set translation protocol were settled, allowing interchange oftext in Cyrillic among machines using diverse incompatible encodings --ditto for East and West European languages written with accented Romanletters, as well as Hebrew, Greek, Japanese, and other scripts. [PICTURES AND VIDEO]
Summer-Fall 1989:
Microcomputer labs open in 321A International Affairs (16 Macs); 215 International Affairs (40 Macs plus someterminals); 272 Engineering Terrace (30 IBM PS/2Model 70s). Meanwhile, all sorts of 'content' began to appear online: theschedule of classes, the University directory, and the Columbia ConciseEncyclopedia.
Sep 1989:
Richard Sacks resigns as director of CUCCA on September 27th.Vace Kundakci (correct spelling: Vaçe Kundakçı), manager ofthe academic IBM mainframes and prior to that systems programmer (since 1977),takes over as acting director.

[ Top ]

[ Early ][ 1920 ][ 1930 ][ 1940 ][ 1950 ][ 1960 ][ 1970 ][ 1980 ][ 1990 ][ 2000 ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]
Jan 1990:
UsingMS-DOS Kermit (Christine) published by Digital Press, with ajacket blurb by Cliff Stoll (Yow!), author of The Cuckoo's Egg[46]. A second edition was published in 1992. Germanand French translations were also published, as was another book about MS-DOSKermit in Japanese (see theKermit Bibliography).
May 1990:
Vace Kundakci takes over as Director, renames CUCCA toAcIS (Academic Information Systems), as distinct fromAIS(Administrative Information Services, formerly ADP).
Mid-1990:
Alan Crosswell becomes Systems Manager, responsible for all centralacademic computing systems (IBM and other), a post last held by Howard Eskinand vacated 5 years before. By this time the only central computers thatmatter are Unix-based (DEC, then Encore, then Sun, plus workstations fromSun, NeXT, and HP) — the academic IBM mainframe is used mainly by theLibraries and a handful of external paying users.

(Somewhere around here CCNET was disbanded because of the Internet.)

Jan 1991:
The Senior Vice President of Columbia is bitten by the outsourcing bugand brings in a consulting firm, American Management Systems Inc (AMS), totake over and 'clean out' administrative computing (AIS). Seventeen peopleare fired. Although a couple of service improvements resulted (mainly a newStudent Information System, SIS), many millions of dollars were wasted on'cutting edge' projects that never panned out and a number of talentedpeople were lost. Eventually AMS left the scene and equilibrium was restored.
1991:
We buy a truckload of NeXT UNIX (NeXTSTEP)workstations for both staff and labs (photo);a major commitment, and (I believe) anattempt to stem the tide of PCs and Macs, which were intrinsically unsafe andlabor intensive for their users and owners (the PCs more so than Macs, whichhave always had a great deal of support from a large contingent of thetechnical staff) and for AcIS staff in its role of support-giver. The NeXTswere configured and managed centrally; user logins were via network to thecentral University database; user directories were on centrally located,managed, and backed up NFS-mounted disks. But before long NeXT was out ofbusiness.
1991:
There is much expansion, renovation, and upgrading of public computer labsduring 1991 (and ever since). The academic and administrative IBM mainframes(4381, 3090, and 3083) are all replaced by a single IBM ES/9121, which ispartitioned into separate academic and administrative virtual machines (afeature of IBM's VM operating system).
Jan 1991:
Three Sun-4/280s (full-sized cabinets) are installed in the machine room asCUNIXA, CUNIXB, and CUNIXD running SunOS 4.1. These (and the Encore) were soonreplaced by Sun pizza-box sized servers, and SunOS was replaced by Solaris.Where central computers once weighed tons, cost millions, filled acres offloor space, required massive cooling and exotic forms of power, now they'redirt-cheap commodity items running at unheard-of speeds with seeminglylimitless amounts of memory and storage, that can be carried under your armand plugged into an ordinary wall socket at ambient room temperature. Ofcourse, today's applications and data saturate this vast capacity just aseffectively as yesterday's simpler applications overwhelmed the resourcesavailable then, and so it shall always be.
Mar-Oct 1991:
Kermit protocol forconversion of Japanesetext among diverse encodings, and for efficient transfer ofpredominantly 8-bit text encodings over 7-bit transports.

(Around here, disk service begins to shift from locally attached disks toRAID file servers, and the backup system changes from the traditionalmanual 9-track tape operation to automated networkbackups to a DAT-drive 'juke box'. All the software was locallywritten and included all the academic servers, Sun as well as the IBMmainframe. Later a commercial backup system, Veritas, took the place of theoriginal homegrown one. Capacity as of Jan 2001: 400 x 40GB tapes = 16000GB(16TB) to cover 1.7TB usable space on the academic file servers.)

Jan 1992:
Conversion of Morningside campus backbone from Ethernet coax to opticalfiber begins; cutover in Spring 1992.
Apr 1992:
AIS moves out of Watson Lab to new quarters in Thorndike Hall atTeachers College (MAP)and in the Computer Center Building [20]. Floors 1 through 5 of Watson Lab were left vacantfor a period, and then, even though the AcIS space on floors 6-9 was (andremains) severely and increasingly overcrowded, the lower five floors— with their rich history and key role in science and computing— were converted to art studios.
Nov 1992:
UsingC-Kermit (Frank and Christine) published by Digital Press,concurrent with the release of version 5 of C-Kermit. A second edition wouldfollow in 1997, as well as a German translation.
1992-1993:
Columbia's Kermit software handles the communications in theBritish relief missionto Bosnia.
1993:
The era of the search engine begins. First there was Archie, thenHypertelnet, then Gopher, then the Web. In 1993, ColumbiaNet is hot, amillion accesses per year (a figure soon to be dwarfed by the Web, see Web statistics table). ColumbiaNet is a text-basedmenu-driven service (remember text?). Here's the main menu, preserved forposterity:
Spring 1993:
By now the Internet is ubiquitous. University TechnologyArchitecture published, setting University-wide standards fornetworking, a common TCP/IP-based network for all computing, administrativeand academic, at Columbia; this was the end product of NPG (see it here as a PDF). Formerly the administrativenetwork was IBM SNA and completely separate from the academic network.While this arrangement might have had its advantages from a securitystandpoint, it was becoming increasingly difficult to manage and for endusers to cope with.
Summer 1993:
The Schapiro Residence Hall (across 115th Street from Watson Lab) iswired for Ethernet as a pilot project for campus-wide networked dormitories.Schapiro is also the first building to be served by the new fiber backbone.
Dec 1993:
New AcIS modem pool announced, consisting of 80+ V.32bis 14400bps error-correcting — of course the noise is still there, but it's detected andcorrected by retransmission automatically by the modems and the IP and TCPnetwork layers, so you don't see it).
Jan-Apr 1994:
The Columbia website debuts; see statistics below. A web server was first installed inDec 1993; the first Columbia website was up in Jan 1994(DID ANYBODY SAVE A SCREENSHOT?),and the website was announced and publicized in Apr 1994.Early original content included the Architecture digital library (1994-95),the Art History digital library (1993-95), the Oversized Geology Maps project(1994-96), and the Bartleby full-text literature project[Source: Rob Cartolano]. Before long, a Web front end to NOTIS-basedCLIO library system was also available (DATE?).
May 1994:
In AIS News V4#2, the Directors of AcIS (Vace Kundakci) andAIS (Mike Marinaccio) present the full range of e-mail options available toColumbia: Pine, MM, VMM, MailBook, the newly emerging PC and Macintoshbased POP clients, and e-mail with MIME attachments.
Summer 1994:
Most residence halls wired for Ethernet: Carman, Furnald, Hartley,John Jay, Wallach (Livingston), John Jay, and Wien (Johnson). ResidenceHall Networking Option (RHNO) offered to students in the Fall. Thefirst electronic classrooms were set up.
Sep 1994:
The public labs are switched from NeXT to HP 9000/712 UNIX (HP-UX)workstations; a big attraction is their ability to run both Mac and PC(Windows) emulators as well as UNIX applications — perfect for the publiclabs but far too pricey for individual desktops.
Sometime in 1994:
I turn over my 'Network Tsar' responsibilities to Bill Chen and devotefull time to the Kermit Project, which I began 14 years earlier and couldnever quite give up. Shortly thereafter, Jeff Altman joins as asecond full-time developer. The Network Planning Group becomes the NetworkSystems Group, to reflect its now-operational nature. Token Ring and SNAnetworks phased out.
Oct 1994:
Columbia's Kermit software serves as the primary communications method inthe Braziliannational election, the world's largest election ever at the time.
Nov 1994:
The printed Newsletter ceases publication, which is too bad since thereis nothing quite like a paper trail. Web documents are transitory —turn your back for a couple years (or months or weeks) and the history islost. The newsletter was the Computer Center (or CUCC, orCUCCA)Newsletter until November 1988, after which it suffered a series ofmakeovers and name changes: Columbia Computing, Computing News, AcademicComputing, SIC [sic] Journal, etc, and then gave up the ghost.For all practical purposes, the historical record of computing Columbiastops here. There was an ASCII archive of newsletters through 1988 onthe DEC-20s, but it was lost when CU20B was switched off.
Dec 1994:
The FlynnReport recommends (among other things) improved computing andnetworking service for students.
1994-95:
Windows and the Web take over. The diverse, rich, idiosyncratic historyof computing stops here. For the first time, computing and networking areopened up to the general public. The locus of computing and networking shiftsfrom science and academia to the mass market.
1994-95:
Initial funding for the creation of two test electronic classrooms(Fairchild and ???) for the 1994-95 year.
1994-present:
AcIS is primarily occupied with the Web, Web-basedservices, 'content', labs, kiosks, Sun servers and NFS'toasters', multimedia classrooms, wired dorms, mobile and wirelesscomputing, video conferencing, webcasting, distance learning, all the whilefending off attacks from within and without — viruses, spam, open mailrelays, junk mail, denial of service attacks, worms, etc — that occurcontinuously from all corners of the globe, and constantly struggling tokeep up with the ever-increasing demand for bandwidth, storage, and dial-inmodems, often just to accommodate services like Napster, Kazaa, InternetRelay Chat, Instant Messaging, and people emailing cartoons, photos, andmovies to each other or serving streaming video from their dorm rooms.Superficially, users rely on AcIS less than before, now that they have theirown desktop computers and applications. But in fact they rely on AcIS morethan ever for essential daily services like virus protection and screening,e-mail and Web access, not to mention the Sun and RAID server farms thatprovide these services — as well as safe, backed-up storage —and the unglamorous infrastructure of network wiring, hubs, and routers(installation, maintenance, updates, expansion, management, configuration),plus the ongoing 'feeds' from the administrative student information, humanresources, and alumni systems, allowing automated identity creation,security, web-based student services, web-based courses, and all the rest,serving virtually every student, staff, and faculty member of theUniversity, a community of over 40,000 users (plus another 50,000+ alumniwith e-mail service).
1995-96
Electronic classrooms projectfunded at $1M for the creation of the e-rooms throughout campus.
Oct 1995:
Kermit 95 forWindows 95 released; this (and C-Kermit)would be the main preoccupation of the Kermit Project for the years to come,plus active involvement inIETF and Unicodestandards. Kermit is a laboratory where we can learn about, experimentwith, develop, and finally package, document, and deploy file transfer andmanagement protocols, Internet clients and servers, character-set translationtechniques, secure authentication and encryption methods, and algorithms ofall kinds big and small, even transport-level network stacks. Even aprogramming language.
1996:
Pioneers in Computing (video), Brief history of Watson Lab, talk byHerb Grosch (minutes 43-50), Computer History Museum.
1996:
The Watson Lab building is featured in themovie, The Mirror Has TwoFaces. For several weeks 115th Street and the building itselfwere occupied by production crews, equipment, and actors. The final shot inthe movie zooms in to a Watson window. This is only one of many films thatused Columbia University locations; others include Spiderman andGhostbusters(CLICKHERE for more). The Columbia neighborhood is also a frequent settingfor TV shows such as Law & Order (where 'Hudson University'is a fictionalized Columbia University) andNew YorkUndercover (1994-1998).
Fall 1997:
The 50th anniversary of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)passed unnoticed at Columbia, even though theACM was founded here.
Jul 1999:
Rolm Dataphone connections (top speed: 19200 bps) were discontinuedbecause by now everybody had Ethernet in their Rolmphone jacks; the Annex andCisco terminal servers to which the central data modules were connected wereswitched off and removed.
Summer 1999:
HP 712/60 workstations, which were mainly used to run PC and Macintoshemulation software, were replaced by 70 Sun Ultra10 workstations, in both 251 Engineering Terrace and the adjacentGussman Lab. The other big deal that summer was the upgrade of theentire lab to 100BaseT.
Dec 1999:
In Pupin Laboratory, site of the world'sfirst automated scientific calculations 65 years earlier,the Computational Field TheoryGroup of the Columbia University Physics Department, working with IBM TJ WatsonResearch Center andBrookhaven National Laboratory,begins construction of a multiteraflops supercomputing resource, theQCDOC machine(Quantum Chromodynamics On a Chip).In April 2002, the group received a fivemillion dollar grant from RIKEN, the JapanInstitute of Physical and Chemical Research in support of this work.CLICK HEREfor further information.
[ Top ]
[ Early ][ 1920 ][ 1930 ][ 1940 ][ 1950 ][ 1960 ][ 1970 ][ 1980 ][ 1990 ][ 2000 ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]
Aug 2002:
AcIS reclaims the 4th floor of Watson Lab. Some art studios are relocatedto Prentis Hall.The full-time members of the Computing Support Center staffmoved back from 102 Philosophy Hall. Walk-in services remain in 102Philosophy but the telephone help desk is now in Watson Lab.
Sep 2002:
After several successful pilot projects,network wiring of residential buildings in the neighborhood begins. Initialservice is 10Mbps, increased to 100 in Feb 2003.
22 Nov 2002:
'Today is the first day in history that Columbia is using Internetservice from a company (Texas based Broadwing) which we had nothing todo with building. Until today, even though we had bought servicefrom companies like PSI and Applied Theory, we used services which we(through Nysernet) had something to do with their creation and expansion,at least in their earlier stages. Let's now hope Broadwing stays inbusiness.' – Vace Kundakci (AcIS Director).
Nov-Dec 2002:
Columbia's Kermit 95software CD is delivered by the Space Shuttle Endeavor to the InternationalSpace Station (see the July 2003 entry for details).
Jan - Feb 2003:
Installation of per-host outbound bandwidth throttling to reduce theimpact of peer-to-peer 'file sharing' (Napster, Gnutella, Kazaa, etc) onnetwork performance.
Jan - May 2003:
As the University drowns in spam (unwanted e-mail), AcIS prototypesfiltering mechanisms.
May 2003:
IBM System/360 nameplate, Console powerswitch, and about 100 lamps sent to the newly relocatedComputer Museum HistoryCenter in Mountain View, California, for reattachment to our IBM 360/91Console, which we donated in 1980 with these pieces missing.
16 Jun 2003:
AcIS activates its spam filters. At this point, incoming mail traffic is500-600,000 messages per day, of which about 20% are filtered. The filteringpolicy, however, is conservative to avoid blocking legitimate mail, so thisfigure does not reflect the actual amount of spam and viruses, not to mentionthe fallout from them (e.g. bounce notifications resulting from forged mail).
Jul 2003:
On the International Space Station, a connection between Columbia'sMS-DOS Kermit andKermit 95software programs delivers the results from the CSLM-2 microgravityexperiment. This experiment is to be run at different times through 2005.CLICK HEREfor the full story.
7 Jul 2003:
New CLIO (Columbia Library Information Online). The previousversion, based on NOTIS software running on the IBM mainframe, dated from the1980s, before the Web and the popularization of the Internet. The first CLIOsystem, based on Bibliotechniques BLIS software, debuted in January 1984; whenBibliotechiques folded a second version of CLIO, based on NOTIS (NorthwesternOnline Totally Integrated System), came up in summer 1988. NOTIS wasdeveloped at Northwestern University and later spun off, then bought byAmeritech Library Services, which was itself snapped up and evidently dissolvedby a 'private investment group' in 1999.

The new Web-centric CLIO is built on Endeavor Information SystemsInc. Oracle-based Voyager software, running on AcIS-administered Sun Solarisservers, and is also used at the US Library of Congress, the US NationalLibraries of Medicine and Agriculture, Princeton, Yale, Cornell, Penn, andelsewhere. At this point, 92% of the University's holdings are catalogedonline, a total of 4 million records, with plans for the remainder (withexceptions like maps and rare books, plus divisions that never joined themain catalog such as the Law and TC Libraries) to be in the catalog by 2005.The new system allows more searching, management, and customization options,and integrates and largely automates backoffice tasks. Perhaps moresignificantly, it is designed to accommodate Unicode, potentially allowingnative-script cataloging of materials in Russian, Greek, Arabic, Hebrew,Chinese, Japanese, and most other languages. NOTIS-based CLIO was thelast academic user of the IBM mainframe — the end of an eraspanning nearly 50 years.

Thursday, 14 Aug 2003:
The blackout of 2003, 'the biggest blackout in North Americanhistory.' Electrical power failed about 4:15pm all over New York, NewJersey, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Ohio, Michigan, and Ontario, as well asparts of Vermont and Massachusetts, affecting 50 million people. Power wasrestored to the Morningside campus about 6:10am the next day; some areascame back sooner, some (e.g. Chelsea) were without power as long as 30hours. The network and hosts began to come online 10:00am-2:00pm Friday,and by 6:00pm all the essential online services (Email, Web, Cunix andrelated software, Courseworks, network, library, modems, etc.) wereavailable; ID management services were restored at 8:39pm Friday. Subwaysand trains resumed operation Saturday morning.
28 Oct 2003:
Columbia's central Sun servers upgraded from Solaris 2.5.1 toSolaris 9. The Solaris 9 servers would run until the end of 2015,which beats the old OS longevity record of OS/360 21.0 (1972-78).
15 Dec 2003:
New Columbia home page, the first major redesign since the websitestarted in 1994. Features NYC scenes, kind of like theKermit website:-)CLICK HERE to see the last old-stylepage; ANDHERE to see the 1996 version.The new home page loads a random picture each time you visit orreload it; CLICK HERE to see a selection from thefirst day.
2004:

COLUMBIA.EDU 20th anniversary.
4 May 2004:
28 years after its first use at Columbia,electronic mail is declared an officialmedium of communication. As of 1 July 2004, all students are requiredto read their e-mail. By this time, nearly all students have their owncomputers; the dorms areall wired, as areneighborhoodapartment buildings;computer labs are found throughoutcampus; andwirelessnetworking is available in key outdoor common areas and variousclassrooms and lounges.
25 May 2004:
Columbia's last academic IBM mainframe, CUVMB, was turned off at10:10am, terminating 36 years of continuous IBM 360-architecture service toColumbia's academic community (and before that, other IBM mainframearchitectures going back to the 1950s, and before that IBM accounting andcalculating machines reaching back to the 1940s, 30s, and 20s). Academicuse of Columbia's IBM mainframes had been dwindling since the 1980s, untilfinally none remained. Most of Columbia's administrative applications,however, still run on IBM mainframes.
Summer 2004:
The SUN workstations were retired from the public labs and replaced byactual PCs and Macintoshes — emulation is never quite like the realthing, and there wasn't that much interest in UNIX any more. The PCs runMicrosoft Windows. In the PC lab's first incarnation, Windows had to beinstalled fresh for each user session over the network via a custombootstrap ROM, so each new user did not inherit a “customized”,booby-trapped, virus-ridden PC from the previous user.
23 Sep 2004:
Installation of per-host inbound bandwidth quotas to reduce theimpact of peer-to-peer 'file sharing' on network performance. This was theheadlinein today's Spectator, reflecting the widespread perceptionthat the purpose of the network, if not the university itself, is to permitstudents to download and trade audio and video without paying for it. The initial limit is400MB per hour.
11 Nov 2004:
Columbia University decides that it was not such a great idea afterall to split academic and administrative computing(early 1988), or to consider computing a libraryfunction (January 1986),and commenced a search for a new VP of Information Technology to head arecombined, reconstituted, restructured, and possibly relocated centralcomputing organization, the details of which will not be known until afternew VP arrives.CLICK HEREfor the announcement.
29 Nov 2004:
Spectatatorpicks up the story, attributing the reorganization to a series of 'AcISglitches' such as hacker and virus attacks; 'Students are all too familiarof [sic] the shortcomings of AcIS. An anonymous SEAS junior said thatAcIS is 'completely incompetent and [doesn't] know how to manage anything'.'In reality, it would be rather difficult to point to any site that supportsa user community upwards of 60,000, mostly on their own Internet-connectedWindows workstations, that 'knows how to manage' hackers and viruses, which,after all, arrive continuously from every corner of the planet, each oneexploiting an as-yet-unknown vulnerability, periodically bringing down majorcorporations and entire governments, sometimes the Internet itself, notmention other universities. Evidently Spectator is alsounaware that AIS and AcIS were a single organization until theUniversity divided them. Putting them back together is a simple matter ofundoing an old mistake, although it's not clear that the decision was madeby anybody who knows that. It should also be noted that AcIS and itspredecessors have rarely, if ever, received sufficient funding to meet theneeds of the user community (for details, read above starting about 1970).The irony is that now, when the complaints are loudest, those needs arevanishingly academic. In the same Spectator issue, the staffeditorial states that, in light of recent crackdowns on illegal downloadingof copyright material (MP3s and video), 'Columbia now has the responsibilityto help students legally download movies and music.' Now we know what weare here for.
1 Jul 2005:
Candace Fleming appointed Columbia Vice President of InformationTechnology, to preside over the once-and-future joint AcIS/AIS organization,yet to be (re)named.
2 Aug 2005:
AIS + AcIS = CUIT (Columbia University Information Technology).
30 Aug 2005:
50th anniversary of Columbia's first computer, an IBM 650 at Watson Lab: the firststored-program computer at Columbia that was available for general use byColumbia researchers and courses. (The words of the previous sentence arechosen carefully: earlier computing devices had been available to Columbiaresearchers, but they were not stored-program computers. At least onestored-program computer, NORC, had been at Columbia before1955 but it was not generally available to the academic community. Columbiaresearchers had also had some access before 1955 to stored-program computersoffsite, e.g. at IBM headquarters downtown; these computers were not atColumbia.) For all but the handful of brave pioneers who used the earlierplugboard-programmed machines, the 650 was indeed the first computer. Withina couple years, it could be programmed in FORTRAN and other symboliclanguages, and quickly became so popular that a second one was added.
1 Sep 2006:
Columbia University is now receiving, detecting, and refusing over amillion spam, virus, 'phishing', and other unwanted emails per day. Ofcourse many still come through, but it is better to allow some spam to passthan to block legitimate mail.
28 Feb 2008:
Alan Crosswell, who has been here almost as long as I have [I was laidoff in 2011 after 37 years at the Computer Center and 45 at Columbia],appointed Associate Vice President and Chief Technologist.
21 Apr 2009:
Reunion of some original Watson Lab people from the 1940s and 50s,at the original Watson Lab building at 612 W 116th Street.CLICK HERE for a gallery.
25 Jan 2010:
Herb Grosch dies at 91 years of age. Anauthentic computer pioneer, he worked here from 1945 to 1950 and in recent years was an energetic and colorful contributor to this history.The photo is from 1951, showing how he looked when he was working in WatsonLab on 116th Street where he came upwith Grosch's Law(in 1950, not 1965 as Wikipedia states; seesee Chapter 13 of Grosch's autobiography).Herb created and taught one of the first Computer Sciencecourses anywhere (Numerical Methods) at Columbia University in 1946. Hewent on to a long and contentious career at MIT, GE, IBM, Datamation, theNational Bureau of Standards, Computerworld, and the ACM, and served on thefaculty of numerous universities.
2 Jan 2013:
50th anniversary of the opening of the ColumbiaUniversity Computer Center.
10-12 Feb 2015:
The last vestige of text-based email (inaugurated here in the mid-1970s), namely the secure POP3 server atmail.columbia.edu:995, was turned off. Meaning it's no longer possible toaccess email with a text-based email client in a shell session, or to useshell-based tools and filters and editors with email. Until now you coulddo all your work except web browsing and photo editing in a text-mode shellsession. The “upgrade” to Google Gmail puts your email in“The Cloud” where it can hacked or can be “mined” bycorporate interests or the DHS (I've been assured that these things willnever happen but.) And where we pretty much have no control over it.No straightforward way to archive it locally. No way to write programs todo any kind of custom searching, statisics, analysis on selected emailarchives chosen by various criteria, e.g. date range. When sending mail,there is no precise control over the formatting, nor any way to choose anencoding other than UTF-8, nor any way to enter non-ASCII characters from aPC keyboard aside from Alt-key escapes (like Alt-0241 for ñ), orsetting your keyboard up to have dead-key combinations, or clicking on acartoon keyboard, none of which are exactly ideal for a touch typist who cantype as fast in Spanish or German, or even Russian, as in English when usinga good terminalemulator*. All in all, compared to MM used with a good terminalemulator, Gmail is pretty labor intensive and inflexible at best, and atworst it puts us in a situation where a profit-driven corporation owns ouremail, not we ourselves. We are forced to use a Web browser to access it,which opens us up to all manner of cookies, spying, marketing, and analysisof our computers and files, not to mention hostile attacks — not fromGoogle, necessarily, but from the whole planet. None of that happens withtext-based email. Even imputing the best of motives to the corporations,the volatility of the market could result in our cloud of email disappearingone day into a stock market vortex, or being bought up by some new companythat could do anything at all with it — hold it for ransom, sell it totabloids. On this topic, an old friend at another university observed acouple years ago:
I have 30+ years of e-mail archives, and it is absolutely mission-criticalthat I own all of my mail files. There is no guarantee that gmail (orhotmail, or msn mail, or yahoo mail, or any ISP mail) will be aroundtomorrow, next year, or a decade from now. e-mail is a critical record ofinstitutional, governmental, and industrial work, and it needs to be ownedby those who created it, not given away to an outside source who is busymining it, and could lose or corrupt it.
Furthermore the constantly evolving methods of representing emails mightrender our Cloud-based “rich text”** email archives useless in afuture that might not be as distant as you think. Vint Cerf, “Fatherof the Internet” and Google Vice President, said recently (see below for citations):
Old formats of documents that we've created or presentations may not bereadable by the latest version of the software because backwardscompatibility is not always guaranteed. And so what can happen over time isthat even if we accumulate vast archives of digital content, we may notactually know what it is.
Plain text, on the other hand, is eternal. ASCII, which serves for Englishand a few other languages, was (and is) a well-defined and mature nationaland international standard, as are subsequent standards like ISO 8859 andISO 10646 (Unicode) that increased the character repertoire to accommodateother languages and writing systems. Whereas presentation methods aredriven by corporate interests and competition and they never stop changing***.The medium swallows the message.
__________________________________
* Columbia's Kermit 95software for Windows employs a Compose-Key mechanism that lets you enterany accented Roman letter without leaving the home keys, evenon a regular US-model keyboard.And a Russian keyboard mode for US keyboards, allowing Russian to be typed'phonetically'.
**It might be plain text when you enter it, but Google converts it toHTML and encodes it in Quoted-Printable notation. That's today; whoknows what it will do tomorrow. Meanwhile, if you want to embed HTML inyour Gmail message deliberately (for example, a table or a list).good luck!
***Ever-changing versions of HTML that render old pages 'uncompliant'.The supposedly immutable original version of HTML. Then XHTML, XML,HTML5. CSS, CSS2, CSS3. De facto 'standards' present and past:Microsoft Word, WordStar, WordPerfect, WPS-8, Multimate, PostScript, PDF,MacWrite, ., and going back a long ways:Runoff,Troff, NLS, . What the world needs and probably will never get is one single immutableinviolable universal standard for the digital representation and archivingof self-contained plain text. I would venture that we had one in the earlydays of email (lines of ASCII text, CRLF to separate lines, double-CRLF toseparate paragraphs), which need only to be expanded to specify UTF-8encoding rather than ASCII, so as to acommodate text in every language andwriting system.
23 May 2015:
Dr. BruceGilchrist, the second director of the Columbia Computer Center (anda major contributor to this history), dies in Richmond VA at the age of 84[obituary](the first director wasKennethKing from 1963 to 1971). Bruce, a genuine pioneerin computing from the 1950s and a prominent figure in the ACM and AFIPS(details here), exemplified the long-forgottenacademic and scientific traditions of the computer center and itspredecessor, the IBM Watson Scientific ComputingLaboratory at Columbia University, serving on the Engineering Schoolfaculty and publishing papers in scientific journals as well as severalbooks on computers and society. Bruce led the Computer Center from 1973 to1984, staying on in an advisory capacity until 1988. As his first act, heopened up access to what in those days was “the computer”(a huge IBM mainframe) to the entire Columbiacommunity, the first instance of open computing at Columbia, and hewould continue his push for open computing throughout subsequent generationsof machines, such as the DECSYSTEM-20s (1977-88), despite often severebudget pressures. Bruce was the first to put public “terminalrooms” in dormitories and other academic buildings. Bruce hiredmainly out of the Engineering School, launching the careers of numerouswomen and men in computing. As a scientist with close connections to thecomputer industry, he was able to combine technical leadership with goodhumor and humane management. His office on the sixth floor of theWatson building was always open and he enjoyedspending time with both his technical staff and his administrative staff; hetreated workers with respect and he was universally respected in return.After relinquishing day-to-day management of the Computer Center in 1984, heconcentrated his efforts on the acquisition and installation of the$20-million-dollar IBM/Rolm Computerized BranchExchange, not just a new telephone system for the University, but also awiring plant that would eventually provide high-speed data access to everybuilding and room on the Morningside campus. Open computing fullyrealized. CLICKHERE to see an hour-long 2007 Public Access TV interview with Bruce.
29 Dec 2015:
Columbia's Cunix timesharing systems were switched fromSolaris 9 on 32-bit Sun Sparc servers that had been runningsince somewhere between 2001 and 2003, to Red Hat Enterprise Linux6.6 on 64-bit x86_64 servers. In the intervening years, direct Unixshell use at Columbia has dwindled down to a handful of diehards, partly inthe nature of the times moving on, but also because key services such asemail had been removed from the shell hosts. Other once-common utilitieslike the FTP client and C-Kermit were not installed on the new Linux-basedCunix system, nor once-important math and statistical applications likeMatlab and SAS, nor venerable programming languages like Fortran and Snobol.But at least the regular GCC development environment remains for the few whostill write C code, and EMACS for those who still do their text processingthe old-fashioned and efficient way rather than the new annoying andlabor-intensive way.

The choice of Linux is primarily market-based, not merely a matter of priceor source-code availability, but of market dominance. Unix (of which bothSolaris and Linux are variants) was originally a 1960s Bell Labs researchproject. Over time it became a proliferation of commercial products –“solutions” – that ran on specific hardware –Solaris for Sun, HP-UX for Hewlett-Packard, AIX for IBM, etc. – but all thesehave practically vanished by now. Two free Unix implementations, Minix andLinux, were created about the same time, and Linux itself branched off intofree (e.g. Debian, Slackware) and corporate (e.g. Red Hat Enterprise)versions. Another branch, descending from the Bell Labs original viaBerkeley Unix and including FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD and friends, remainsfree community-sourced software. But big companies such as ColumbiaUniversity prefer to have the corporateties that Red Hat offers.

29 Feb 2016:
The central Sun Solaris-based CUNIX timesharing systems turned off afterabout 15 years of service, replaced by Linux servers.
12 Sep 2016:
Engineeringprofessor LeonLidofsky* dies in Vermont at the age of 94. A World War IINavy veteran, he was one of Columbia's earliest 'hands-on' users of digitalcomputers, establishing a computer lab on the second floor of theEngineering Terrace in the mid-1960s that included a room-sized minicomputer(SEL 810B), a tabletop DECPDP-8, and various specialized equipment for data collection andanalysis, one of only a handful of Columbia'sdepartmental computing facilities at the time. I first met him in 1969 whenI got a student job in his department.

I graduated from the school of General Studies in 1970 and left thedepartment to find a real job, and wound up driving a taxi in Bronx. Aftera while Lee asked me to come back and work in the department full-time asthe administrator for a newprogram he was in charge of, dealing with the social responsibilities ofengineers and ways they could be of public service. Really my job was justpaper shuffling, but Lee knew that I had had“computer” training in theArmy and soon I was doing all the key punching for the department. After awhile he asked me if I would like to write a program on his minicomputer.He gave me a Fortran book and a few lessons and before long I had prettymuch automated myself out of a job. Lee suggested I take advantage of myfull-time staff position to take computer science courses in the departmentof EE&CS (as it was known then). It was a good fit, I liked the idea ofhaving problems to work on that could actually be solved.

As a sideline, Lee was a consultant in nuclear medicine at Mt. SinaiHospital (click here for an example of hiswork there). When the Columbia project I was working on came to a close, hegot me my first real programming job in Mt. Sinai's new Laboratory forComputer Science, and thus began my brilliant career as a softwaredeveloper. Along the way I wrote some books and always featured him in theacknowledgments, as in my last book(UsingC-Kermit, 2nd Ed.): “. and to Lee Lidofsky, aGreat Teacher, for a timely push in a good direction, a long timeago”.

Incidentally, the computers at the Mt. Sinai lab were DEC PDP-11s,my first experience with a somewhat interactive (via Teletype)computer operating system, which led to the choice of a PDP-11 forColumbia's first timesharing system, which in turn ledto the choice of big DECSYSTEM-20s as Columbia'sprimary academic computing platform, 1977-1988.

Anyway, thanks to Lee I had a decent job with good salary and benefits thatallowed me to raise a family and put my kids through college. If notfor Lee, I'd probably still be driving a cab! Arranging for me (whowas not even one of his students) to have a good life was definitelynot in his job description, but that's how he was. I'm sure there area thousand other stories just like this one.
______________________
*In case the link goes stale,click here for a screen shot.Also see the See Burlington Free Press obituary
2015-2016
CUIT outsources IBM mainframe administrative applications to a3rd party.
February 2017
CUVMC, Columbia's last IBM mainframe, was shut down for the final time.CUIT no longer operates IBM computers, thus ending a Columbia-IBMpartnership that lasted nearly 100 years.
25 January 2019
Ellie Krawitz (Eleanor Krawitz Kolchin), who worked at Watson Lab in thelate 1940s and wrote this 1949 article describing thelab and its work, passed away January 25, 2019, in Boca Raton, Florida. In2003 she sent me a paper copy of her article, which I transcribed and postedto this site. In February 2013, Huffington Post stumbled upon it,contacted and interviewed her, publishingan articleabout her that earned her belated recognition as one of the lastsurviving women pioneers in computing. In the years since then, she washonored by the Association for Computing Machinery and the National Centerfor Women in Information Technology, and her 1949 article has beentranslated (to date) into 20 languages from Bengali to Ukrainian.


[ Introduction ][ Timeline ][ Epilog ][ Tables ][ Acronyms ][ Glossary ][ Sources ][ Links ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]

Epilog

The first paragraph below was written a long time ago and doesn't reallyapply more. In the new century, computing resources are mainly private andthe University happily supplies the mostly invisible infrastructure. Thereare no more budget battles as in the 1970s and 80s, nowadays nobodyquestions the importance of universal high-speed network availability andwhen the network needs expanding or upgrading, it happens without astruggle. Furthermore support staff is at an all-time high, by far, as isoffice space. But then, so is tuition, yet students get a lot less bang forthe buck in terms of employment prospects after graduation, not to mentionmany of them being saddled with enormous debt. Sometimes I wonder ifstudents 100 or 250 years ago didn't get a better education with justlectures, blackboards, and books.
A theme that runs throughout this story is the neverending tug-of-war betweensupply and demand. Computers were extremely expensive in the early days, andspace has always been the most valuable resource at Columbia's confined urbancampus. The first computers were obtained largely through grants for specificresearch projects, but soon other uses were found for them and the Universitybecame increasingly dependent on them. After the grants expired the computershad to be continuously maintained, upgraded, and replaced. The eternalquestions have been: How to pay? What to sacrifice? Where to put theequipment? How to get the space? How to recoup the expense? How to increaseaccess? How to allocate limited computing resources? How to expand resourcesthat are swamped by increasing demand? Who subidizes and who is subsidized?

It's interesting to ponder the transformation of Columbia from a quill-penoperation in the 1700s to the 'wired' (and, increasingly, wireless) one it istoday. Computers, obtained originally for scientific work that could not bedone any other way, were also turned to administrative tasks such asregistration, student records, payroll, and so on. What was the cost inmoney, space, and personnel before and after? And then later when centralizedcomputing (based on a single multimillion dollar computer system) became fullydistributed, with a PC on every desk, how did that change the overallexpenditures, consumption of space and electrical power, personnel rosters,and the productivity of each person? Any clear answer would take a great dealmore research than was done here, but the following table is suggestive:

19252010Increase
Students241882760614%
Officers of Instruction17713630205%
Officers of Administration9258136218%
Full-Time Support Staff 11983402184%
Tuition (dollars per point) 8137217150%

Sources: The 1925 figures come from Columbia's 1924-25 Catalog[5] and from the 1924-25 Annual Report[35]; the student count does not include another 12,916summer session students; the officers of administration include 38 who arealso on the faculty. The 2010 figures come from the Columbia University Statistical Abstract of the Officeof Planning and Institutional Research (on the Web). The growth in facultyis accounted for almost entirely by the Health Sciences campus, which didnot exist in 1925.

Although the role of computing in staff and tuition increases is far fromclear, it is evident that Columbia University was able to offer afirst-class education to about 20,000 students annually with a lot lessoverhead and at far less expense without computers than with them, evenaccounting for inflation (which averaged 3.1% per year from 1925 to 2000 or987% over the period; thus if tuition had merely kept pace with inflation,it would have risen only to $79 per point rather than $834 in 2000). Ofcourse, one can't necessarily blame computers alone for a topheavybureaucracy -- since the 1950s, huge amounts of additional work in the formof reports (compliance, demographic, financial, etc) mandated by government,suppliers, and contractors at every level. Anyway, as any student whoregistered in the old days (filling in countless forms by hand with the sameinformation and standing in about 50 lines to turn in each form) can tellyou, some of the new systems are an improvement. Columbia is also a farbigger employer than it was in 1925 and it's a good thing that more peoplehave work, even if it's pointless. Or if you take a closer look, maybeit's not such a good thing.

When the Computer Center opened in 1963, there was one big computer foreverybody to use, cared for by a small professional staff, initially just 15people. Today, the combined full-time staff of AcIS and AIS (now CUIT)numbers well into the hundreds, and this doesn't count an unknown number offull and part-time computer people in the administrative and academicdepartments, nor junior faculty and graduate students shanghaied intosystem-administration roles, nor the fact that almost everybody at theUniversity devotes copious time to 'managing' and fighting with their owndesktop computers into the bargain, not to mention dealing (or worse: not)with the constant onslaught of viruses, worms, and hacks from all corners ofthe world. One is tempted to wonder in exactly what way computers arelabor-saving devices :-)

But love 'em or hate 'em, computers and networks are with us to stay. Theyfirst came to Columbia for scientific and statistical work; now they areused mainly for social and entertainment purposes, plus taking notes inclass, preparation of papers, a certain amount of course work, and forcarrying on the business of the University, including a great deal of publicrelations. All students and faculty are presumed to have computer, network,and Web access; it is required in many courses and for numerous tasks suchas looking up class schedules, room assignments, and grades, and since Fall2001, also for registration.

The benefits of the Web are well known but its dangers little discussed, atleast not beyond the well-known safety hazards (credit-card theft, pedophiles,viruses) and annoyances (bugs and new features requiring constant softwareupgrades). Let's look at some of the more fundamental pitfalls that tend to beignored as we rush to replace all that is old by what is new:

  • For good or ill, the Web has largely replaced the Library forundergraduate research. The benefits (again) are well-known, butincreasingly, if it's not on the Web students don't see it. Furthermore, it'soften difficult to assess the information one finds on the Web. Publishedbooks and journal articles, at least, have some measure of quality control andsome form of audit trail (you can check the primary sources yourself). At thevery least, they are substantial and immutable objects that can be referenced-- when you look at a book or article that I have referenced, you see thesame one I saw. Web pages are ephemeral, likely to move, change, or disappearat any moment, and in any case rarely have the authority of a refereed,printed publication.
  • Since I wrote the previous item, the Web itself has been largelysupplanted by Google and Wikipedia for research. Wikipedia is handy, to besure, but how do you verify the accuracy of anything in it? Google, on theother hand, is a massive corporation whose only goal is making more and moremoney, and as part of achieving that goal, it controls the content we see.Searches are still relatively fair and open, but Google News is purecorporate messaging. Nevertheless, Google can throw a switch at any momentto hide entire bodies of knowledge or opinion it deems prejudicial to itscorporate health.
  • In a new application of Gresham's Law, the Web tends to drive out reliableand detailed information, replacing it with unreliable and sketchy 'soundbites'. Libraries full of books and journals are increasingly viewed as'legacy' 'brick and mortar' operations that can no longer justify theirexistence in the age of electronic information. But those same librariescontain all that is known of history, culture, and science. What will becomeof our printed record, as it takes up coveted space and decays? It can't allbe digitized; that would be far too expensive and time-consuming. Thereforemuch -- probably most -- of it will be lost to posterity. And then whateverportion was digitized before the paper was discarded or crumbled will itselfbe subject to successive rounds of winnowing as the digital media, encoding,and formats become obsolete and require 'upgrading'. Repeated application ofthis process will leave only a tiny fragment of what was available to us in,say, 1980, and there will be no going back.
  • New information is lost too. It was relatively easy to trace thehistory of computing at Columbia through 1994 by the paper trail ofnewsletters, books, paper correspondence files, and so on. After 1994, it'sjust a blur. If it was recorded at all, it was recorded on the Web or ine-mail, and there is no systematic archive of old Web pages and e-mails.

    This history is itself a good example. Originally written in 2001, itsthen-correct HTML encoding decayed before our very eyes over the years. In2019 I converted it to HTML5, which (like most of its predecessors) issupposed be eternal. But before long HTML5 too will be 'legacy', 'deprecated', and eventually completely forgotten, as will this history.Compare with printed books, that never have to be patched or recoded orotherwise 'upgraded'.

  • What is new today will be old tomorrow. The Web is not eternal.Something else is bound to appear that turns the Web into a 'deprecated'legacy' concept and the vast corpus of Web files will need conversion to thenext thing, and the winnowing process will continue.
    I wrote the previous sentence about 15 years ago. Today I see Vint Cerf,'father of the Internet', saying the same thing at the American Associationfor the Advancement of Science conference in San José. Toparaphrase. Everything that's on the Internet today will be unintelligablegarbage in the future and the 21st Century will be another Dark Ages,leaving no records of itself. Here's alink: http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-31450389.Here'sanother: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11410506/Print-out-digital-photos-or-risk-losing-them-Google-boss-warns.html.But don't expect them to last. [Search]
    —13 February 2015

    Meanwhile, as of 2014, cell phones have squeezed out desktop computers asthe main Web access method, forcing websites to adapt by showing lesscontent. i.e. sound bites instead of detailed information. Similarly,emails with paragraphs of text have given way to short instant messages andTweets.

Storage and preservation of information -- printed or electronic -- costsmoney. Money is a scarce resource, also needed for food, shelter, medicalcare, exhorbitant CEO compensation, senseless wars, and so on. The legacyof humanity belongs to those with the desire and the money to preserve it,and to keep preserving it, and they are ones who will decide what is worthpreserving and what to discard.

[ Introduction ][ Timeline ][ Epilog ][ Tables ][ Acronyms ][ Glossary ][ Sources ][ Links ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]

Old News

CU Computing History Site in Network World
How toreally bury a mainframe (University of Manitoba),17 December 2007.
Columbia University 250th Anniversary (2004)
CLICK HERE to visit Columbia'sextensive website commemorating the university's 250th anniversary(andHEREandHEREandHEREfor some computing history bits).

[ Introduction ][ Timeline ][ Epilog ][ Tables ][ Acronyms ][ Glossary ][ Sources ][ Links ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]

Tables

1. Number of Dialin Modems
YearOldNewTotalRemarks
197123023(V6#13: 5 CRBE + 18 Wylbur)
198559059
198684084(First 2400 bps)
198884084(Moved from PACX to Rolm)
1993841094(First V.32bis)
19948482166
199584154238(First V.34, first SLIP/PPP)
19960250250
19970298298
19980482482
19990644644(All V.90 56K)
20010736736
20020805805

'Old' means no error correction, compression, or hardware flow control. 'New'modems are connected to (or integrated with) TCP/IP terminal servers; old oneswere connected to serial ports on the PACX or Rolm. Prior to 1985 it's hard tofigure out -- specific phone numbers went to specific computers, etc; fewcomprehensive tables were published in the Newsletter or Guides to Facilities.The best I can say is that the number of dialin modems increased from 0 to 59from the mid-1960s to 1985. Modem-pool expansion finally leveled off in2002-2003, when DSL connections became possible from the home and AcIS beganto bring neighborhood apartment buildings onto the high-speed campus network.

2.Columbia Web growth

YearTotalCUAcIS
19943580000310000220000
199563051290101023903817480
19961219774003479560013646120
199724202310010380570024188300
199835023300017389070032039700
199949635020824865795241192400
200078261365533968007352106380
2001975530540442895314103766239
2002 1203698999 597895887 72669298
2003 1347966061 682969914 96849101
2004 1394513293 534202948 143452610
2005 1425516685 576447890 149184118

The numbers reflect total accesses (hits) per year. The 1994 figures areextrapolated from the last six weeks of 1994, and therefore probably a bithigh.

3.Registered Network Addresses By Campus

Month/
Year
MorningsideHealth
Sciences
LamontTotal
1/199437093817134803
1/1995634423567679467
1/199610264402693615226
1/1997135565991100420551
2/1998182799067140728753
2/19992362111576169036887
2/20002750414077205643637
2/20013163016731231750678
2/200241334204232505 64262
2/200344078252162842 72136
In later years the growth is exponential, not only with computers on everydesk, but Internet phones replacing the 20,000-phone Rolm system, and withwireless devices all needing their own IP addresses: cell phones, laptops,tablets, netbooks, etc etc. Network address assignment of client devicesis now almost completely dynamic.

4.E-Mail Messages Per Week

YearCount
199137600
199255400
199382700
1994188900
1995299600
1996442900
1997586784
1998798688
19991100000
20002400000
20013460000
2002 3960000
2010 14000000
According to Columbia's Postmaster, Joe Brennan, in early 2011 Columbia'scentral mail servers were receiving about a two million messages a day, ofwhich about 50% are discarded as spam or attack mail. Of the remaining 50%,I'd estimate that at least 80% is also unwanted mail; the mail filtersdeliberately err on the side of not discarding legitimate mail. In anycase, a great deal of cycles, storage, and bandwidth are consumed by uselessand often harmful or offensive junk, and this must be paid for with realmoney.

[ Introduction ][ Timeline ][ Epilog ][ Tables ][ Acronyms ][ Glossary ][ Sources ][ Links ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]

Acronyms

AcIS Academic Information Systems (of Columbia University)
ADP Administrative Data Processing (of Columbia University)
AIS Administrative Information Services (new name of ADP)
ANSI American National Standards Institute
APL A Programming Language (With Its Own Character Set)
ARPA (US Defense Department) Advanced Research Projects Agency
ASCC Automatic Sequence Controlled Calculator (early IBM computer)
ASCII American Standard Code for Information Interchange
ASP Attached Support Processor
AUC Apple University Consortium
AUFS Appletalk UNIX File Server
BAL Basic (IBM 360 and 370) Assemly Language
BASIC Beginners All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code
BASR Bureau of Applied Social Research (of Columbia University)
BCD Binary Coded Decimal
BCDIC Binary Coded Decimal Interchange Code
BITNET Because-It's-There Network ('It' = RSCS')
BNF

Macbook Manual

Backus-Naur Form
BPS Bits per Second
CAP Columbia Appletalk Package
CBX (IBM/Rolm/Siemens) Computerized Branch Exchange
CCNET Computer Center (or Columbia/Carnegie) Network (DECnet)
CE (IBM) Customer Engineer
CLIO Columbia Libraries Information Online
CMU Carnegie-Mellon University
COBOL Common Business Oriented Language
CPC Card Programmed Calculator
CP/M Control Program / Microcomputer
CPS Characters per Second
Macbook manualCRBE Conversational Remote Batch Entry
CREN Consortium for Research andEducation Network
CRLF ASCII charactersCarriage Return and Line Feed - plaint-text line terminator
CRT Cathode-Ray Tube, e.g. a video terminal
CUCC Columbia University Computer Center
CUCCA Columbia University Center forComputing Activities, new name of CUCC
CUIT Columbia UniversityInformation Technology, new name of CUCCA
CUNY City University of New York
CWRU Case Western Reserve University
DACU Device Attachment Control Unit (early IBM Ethernet adapter)
DASD Direct Access Storage Device (IBM term for 'disk', pronounced dazdee)
DAT Digital Audio Tape
DCMUP Same as DCS (not sure what it stands for).
DCS Directly Coupled System (Columbia's IBM 7040 and 7094)
DEC Digital Equipment Corporation
DOS Disk Operating System
EAM Electric Accounting Machine (using punched cards)
EBCDIC Extended Binary Coded Decimal Interchange Code
EDUCOM blah blah
EMACS Editing Macros (video editor by Richard Stallman)
FORTRAN Formula Translator (first high-level programming language)
FE Field Engineer (DEC)
FS Field Service (DEC)
FSF Free Software Foundation
GNU GNU is Not UNIX (recursive acronym of the FSF)
GUI Graphical User Interface
HASP Houston Automatic Spooling Program
HP Hewlett Packard Corporation
IBM International Business Machines Corporation
IETF Internet Engineering Task Force
JCL Job Control Language (OS/360, MVS, etc)
JSYS Jump to System (DEC-20 monitor call)
JVNCNET John von Neumann Supercomputer Center Network
KGB (Soviet) Committee forState Security
LAN Local Area Network (Ethernet, Token Ring, etc)
LCG (DEC) Large Computer Group
LISP List Processing (language)
LPM Lines per Minute(speed of line printer)
MINCE MINCE Is Not Completely EMACS (EMACS semi-clone for CP/M)
MOS Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (memory, as opposed to magnetic cores or vacuum tubes)
MSS (IBM) Mass Storage System
MTBF Mean Time Between Failures
MTTR Mean Time To Repair
NCR National Cash Register Corporation
NFS Network File System
NORC Naval Ordnance ReseachCalculator (early IBM computer built at Columbia U)
NPG Network Planning Group (of Columbia U)
NSF National Science Foundation
NSFNET National Science Foundation Network
NYSERNET New York State Education and Research Network
OCS Office of Communications Services (of Columbia University)
OS Operating System
PACX Private Access Computer eXchange
PDP Programmed Data Processor
PDS Partitioned Data Set
PL/I Programming Language One
PPP Point-to-Point Protocol
RAID Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disk
RHNO Residence Hall Networking Option (at Columbia U)
RJE Remote Job Entry
RSCS Remote Spooling Communications Subsystem
RSTS/E Resource Sharing Time Sharing / Extended (DEC PDP-11 OS)
SAIL Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (or Language)
SE Software Engineer (DEC); Systems Engineer (IBM) Also see: FE, CE
SEL Systems Engineering Laboratories
SLIP Serial Line Internet Protocol
SNA (IBM) Systems Networking Architecture
SNOBOL String Oriented Language (pun on COBOL)
SPITBOL (pun on SNOBOL)
SSIO Self-Service Input/Output (area at Columbia U)
SIC Scholarly Information Center (at Columbia University)
SOS Share Operating System(IBM 709)
SOS Son Of Stopgap(PDP-10, DEC-20 text editor)
SPOOL simultaneous peripheraloperations on-line or simultaneous peripheral output on line
TOPS The Operating System (for PDP-10s and DEC-20s)
UUCP UNIX-to-UNIX Copy Program
VT Video Terminal

[ Introduction ][ Timeline ][ Epilog ][ Tables ][ Acronyms ][ Glossary ][ Sources ][ Links ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]

Glossary of Forgotten Terms

Batch
A way for users to run programs on shared computers. Jobs are submitted(e.g. as decks of cards) into a queue. Each job reaches the head of thequeue, executes, and then the results are delivered the user (e.g. as aprintout). This is a step up from the early days when users needed hands-onexclusive access to the computer in order to use it. Batch survives today ontimesharing systems such as Unix (as 'cron' jobs), VMS, and of course on IBMmainframes, but usually without the cards and printouts. Nowadays sharedcomputers are accessed mainly through timesharing. Meanwhile, personaldesktop computers have made hands-on exclusive access the norm once again.
Control panel
(See plugboard)
Core
This word is still used synonymously with 'memory', but in fact refers to aspecific memory technology used from about 1955 to 1975, in which each bitwas a ferrite core, whose charge was controlled and sensed by currents inwires passing through the core's hole. MORE HERE.
CRT
Cathode Ray Tube. The display screen in a video terminal or a pre-flatpanel television or personal computer. More generally, any vacuum tubeincorporating a mobile beam. 1950s-era computer memories were sometimesmade of CRTs; for example, the IBM 700-series CRTmemories packed 1024 bits into a single tube (contrary to the popularimage of one bit per tube).
Drum
Similar to a hard disk, except the recording surface is on thecircumfrence, rather than on the flat end(s), and the read/write headsare fixed rather than moving. Thus it is a spinning cylinder with astationary head array extending from end to end, with one fixed head pertrack. Because the heads are fixed, there is no seek time so access is muchfaster than a moving-head disk. Drums were used as main memory in earlycomputers like the IBM 650 and as swapping or pagingdevices in later computers such as the IBM 360/91 andthe DEC PDP-11. An example is the IBM 2301 drum storage, about 1960. Also:(1) Any fixed-head disk or, by extension, any swapping device;(2) A Data Cell cylinder around which a tape stripis wrapped for reading and writing;(3) The print mechanism used incertain kinds of line printers, such as the DEC LP20:a constantly rotating metal cylinder with allthe characters on it -- to print a specific character in a specific column,the corresponding hammer strikes the drum just when the desired character isbehind the paper and ink ribbon; (4) the electrostatic print-transfer mechanismin Xerographic or laser printers.
Electric (or Electronic) Accounting Machine (EAM)
EAMs were the workhorses of the 1930s-60s for accounting, payroll, and soon, before there were real stored-program computers. They were mainlymechanical; accumulating sums in gear registers. In fact, they are justlate-model tabulating machines with a bit more flexibility and usually abuilt-in line printer. CLICK HERE to seeexamples.
Paper Tape
A long strip of heavy paper, usually an inch wide, in which holes could bepunched, 5 to 9 per row. For computer use, usually 8 holes were used:7 data bits and 1 parity bit. Paper tape was also used in telecommunications(telex) and in the printing industry as the input medium for hot-metaltypesetting machines and is still used for numerical control of milling anddrilling machines. Computer applications of paper tape included automateddata input and output, as on the ASR33 Teletypeor the IBM 1620 computer,object-module output by compilers (on computers that did not have disks -- forexample, the output of a Fortran compiler), and printer control loops(see story at the end of this page). Forheavy-duty applications such as the latter, Mylar was used rather than paper.The typical recording density was 10 rows (bytes) per inch. Punching andreading speeds varied from 10 rows per second up to 2000. Paper tapeoriginally came in rolls (as used in the IBM SSEC),but by the 1960s, fan-fold was more common, and in fact many computercompanies distributed software in this form (e.g. for the DEC PDP-8). Anincorrectly punched row could be 'deleted' by punching all the holes; this isthe origin of the ASCII RUB (Rubout, Delete) character, 0x7F (all 1's).Editing could also be accomplished by cutting and splicing. More at the University ofAmsterdam Computing History Museum.
Plugboard, Patch Board, Patch Panel, Control Panel
IBM EAM equipment (accounting machines, sorters, reproducing punches,interpreters, etc) as well as some of its early calculators (computers) wereprogrammed through control panels — rectangular boards with anarray of holes, which are interconnected by wires to specify the desiredfunctions, e.g. which card columns are to be sent to which accumulator, orprinted to which printer columns, etc. Photos and more info:[HERE] [HERE] [HERE][HERE] and[HERE].
Punched Card
A stiff cardboard rectangle in which holes can be punched and then laterread by various devices (see Unit Record Equipment). Punchcards date back tothe 1700s, and can be found in many formats. IBM punchcards (after 1928) were7 3/8' inches wide and 3 1/4' high, with three rounded corners and the upperleft corner cut diagonally, and twelve 80-column rows for small rectangularholes. Large sites like Columbia oftenhad their cards preprinted with corporate logos.Until the early 1970s, virtually all computing jobs at Columbia were submittedon decks of cards punched on key punch machines.Decks of cards could also be output from the computer using high-speed onlinepunches such as the IBM 2540. Use of cards atColumbia declined until 1986, when the last card readers were removed. Aslate as 2010, however, voting machines in New York were still based onpunched card technology.
Relay
An electromechanical device or switch that automatically controls thecurrent in one circuit based on the current in another circuit, used in1940s-era calculators and computers such as theAberdeens, the SSEC,and the Bell relaycalcalators.
Remote Job Entry
Or RJE. In the mainframe era, before interactive terminals, jobs weresubmitted on decks of cards and results obtained on a line printer or otherlocal device. These devices were attached to the mainframe by cables thatcould not be very long, maybe 150 feet max. To access the mainframe fromgreater distances required a Remote Job Entry station: usually a card readerand line printer connected to some kind of controller, connected by (usuallysynchronous) modem to the central site. Typically an RJE user would put adeck of cards in the hopper, push Start, and wait an unpredictable amount oftime for the results to come out of the printer. One of many examples ofthe widespread use of RJE was the New York City public school system in the1970s, where each school had an RJE station connected to the bigmainframe(s) at Board of Education. The IBM RJE interface was fairly wellstandardized, so it also came to double as a connection for other kinds ofcomputers -- a kind of early networking, in which traffic in one directionwas in 80-column card images, and traffic in the reverse direction was132-column printer lines.
Tabulating Machine
A machine capable of reading punched cards and either sorting them intoselected bins or adding up the numbers punched into selected columns.Tabulating machines were used from 1890 through the 1950s or 60s forstatistical, financial, and even scientific applications.CLICK HERE for examples.
Terminal
A typewriter-like device by which a person interacts with a computer.It has a keyboard and either paper to print on or else a video screen(certain special kinds of terminals might also have Braille pads ortext-to-voice interpreters). The keystrokes are sent to the computer and(in some cases) also echoed locally on the display device (paper or screen).Characters arriving from the computer are sent to the display device. Videoterminals sometimes have an attached printer. Early hardcopy terminalsincluded Teletypes and electric typewriterswired for communication, such as the IBM 2741; laterones include dot-matrix models such asthe DECwriter. The best-known video terminal isthe DEC VT100; video terminals were popular fromthe mid-1970s until about 1990 (and are still used today in certainspecialized applications like data entry and transaction processing; untilnot so long ago, every winter TV news reporters visit the NYC Heat ComplaintBureau, and every year they were still using IBM 3270'green tubes'). The best-known graphics terminal is theTektronix 4010. Although few real terminals arestill in operation, terminals are widely emulated by the PC, Macintosh, andother workstation software that allows us to access our 'shell accounts'.
TTY
Teletype (see Terminal).
Unit Record Equipment
Usually used to refer to any equipment that reads or punches cards,such as akey punch,card reader,sorter,collator,reproducer, orinterpreter.Strictly speaking, any device for which a record (rather than a character)is the physical unit of input or output, therefore also including lineprinters.

[ Introduction ][ Timeline ][ Epilog ][ Tables ][ Acronyms ][ Glossary ][ Sources ][ Links ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]

Sources

  1. My recollections and notes, 1965-present.
  2. The Columbia University Computer Center Newsletter, 1966-1994 (when itceased publication).
  3. Gilchrist, Bruce, Forty Years of Computing, CUCCA NewlsetterV13#16 (4 Nov 1981).
  4. Bashe, Charles J.; Lyle R. Johnson; John H. Palmer; EmersonW. Pugh,IBM's Early Computers, MIT Press (1985).
  5. Columbia University Catalogue,1924-1925.
  6. Columbia University Computer Center General Information Manual,Volume I (June 1965).
  7. Columbia University Bulletin: ComputingActivities (1976).
  8. Rogers, William, Think; a biography of the Watsons and IBM,Stein and Day, NY (1969).
  9. Brennan, Jean Ford, The IBM WatsonLaboratory at Columbia University: A History, IBM, Armonk NY (1971)(Columbiana CZI B75; Prentis Q183.5 .W3 B7).
  10. Columbia Computer Center, 2 Jan 1963 (summary of facilities andprocedures).
  11. Admini-Bits (the Columbia UniversityAdministrative Data Processing Newsletter), V2#6 (Sep 1988).
  12. Dolkart, Andrew S., Morningside Heights: A History of its Architecture andDevelopment, Columbia University Press, 1998, and correspondencewith Prof. Dolkart (Jan 2001).
  13. McCullers, Carson, and Dews C.L. Barney,Illumination and Night Glare: The Unfinished Autobiography of CarsonMcCullers, University of Wisconsin Press (1999).
  14. Asteroff, Janet, CUCCA Terminal and Plotter User Manual (Nov1982).
  15. Bell System Technical Journal:Special issue devoted to UNIX 7th Edition, Volume 57, Number 6, Part 2(August 1978).
  16. Brader, Mark, A Chronology of Digital Computing, to 1952(online).
  17. Koenig, Seymour H., Interview (22 Jan 2001).
  18. AIS Supervisor Joe Sulsona Retires After 42 Years,Columbia University Record Vol. 26, No 11 (19 Jan 2001).
  19. Gilchrist, Bruce, Report to the Committee on InstructionalComputing (the Collery Committee), Columbia University (21 April 1980).
  20. Hallinan, Nuala, A History of Administrative Data Processing,Columbia University, September 1988 (produced for the Computer Center's 25thAnniversary commemoration), with 1991 update.
  21. Announcement of the Watson Scientific Computing Laboratory anda Program of Graduate Studies in Applied Mathematics, ColumbiaUniversity Bulletin, Fifty-eighth Series, No.39, September 27, 1948.
  22. Arctander, Eric, Trig Homework? Consult Watson Labs,Columbia Daily Spectator, 18 October 1948.
  23. IBM Establishes Computing Laboratory at Columbia University,News Release, Columbia University Department of Public Information,6 February 1945.
  24. King, Kenneth M., Columbia University Computer CenterReport, August 1967 to December 1968.
  25. Guide to Facilities, Columbia Computer Center, September 1972.
  26. Sills, David L., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, 1901-1976, A BiographicalMemoir, National Academy of the Sciences, Washington DC, 1987.
  27. Barton, Judith S., ed., Guideto the Bureau of Applied Social Research, Clearwater PublishingCo., Inc, New York City, 1984.
  28. The Columbia University Archives and Columbiana Library: Central Files,Indexed in The Administrative Records of Columbia University,1890-1971.
  29. Halford, Ralph S., Proposal to the National ScienceFoundation for Support of a Computing Center to be Established at ColumbiaUniversity, May 1961.
  30. News Release #10,099, Columbia University News Office, 18 Jul 1963.
  31. Mace, David, and Joyce Alsop, A Simplified System for the Use ofan Automatic Calculator, Watson Scientific Computing Laboratory,Columbia University / IBM, 1957 (COVER).
  32. Proposal for IBM 360 Model 92 [sic], to Dr. Kenneth M. King, ColumbiaComputer Center, IBM, 21 May 1965.
  33. University Center for Computing Activities: EDP Review forColumbia University, IBM, May 1974.
  34. Strauss, Robert, When Computers Were Born, The Times MirrorCompany, 1996.
  35. Annual Report of the President and Treasurer to the Trustees withAccompanying Documents for the Year Ending June 30, 1925, ColumbiaUniversity, New York, 1926.
  36. Letter of Dean Ralph S. Halford to Prof. Maurice Ewing, 19 Aug 1963(9 pages), Columbiana Archives.
  37. 'Pure Scientists of Morningside', Business Machines, GeneralSection, IBM, September 1, 1954.
  38. Aspray, William, 'Was Early Entry a Competitive Advantage? USUniversities That Entered Computing in the 1940s', IEEE Annals of theHistory of Computing, Volume 22, Number 3, July-September 2000.
  39. Lippsett, Laurence, 'Maurice Ewing and the Lamont-Doherty EarthObservatory', Columbia Magazine, Winter 2001.
  40. Pugh, Emerson W., Building IBM: Shaping an Industry and itsTechnology, The MIT Press (1995).
  41. Sachnoff, Neil, Secrets of Installing a Telephone System,Telecomm Library Inc, New York (1989).
  42. 'There's a Computer on the Columbia Campus', Columbia Reports,March 1971.
  43. Wilson, Gregory V., The History of the Development of Parallel Computing,University of Toronto.
  44. Austrian, Geoffrey, Herman Hollerith: Forgotten Giant of Information Processing,Columbia University Press (1982).
  45. Grier, David Alan, WhenComputers Were Human, Princeton University Press (2005).AND.Grier, David Alan, 'The First Breach of Computer Security?',IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, Volume 23,Number 2, April-June 2001. NOTE: These should be two separate referencesbut evidently the second one was inserted here by mistake when it shouldhave gone at the end, thus throwing off all the subsequent referencenumbers. Sorry!
  46. Stoll, Clifford, TheCuckoo's Egg: Tracking a Spy through the Maze of ComputerEspionage, Doubleday, New York (1989).
  47. Black, Edwin, IBMand the Holocaust, Crown Publishers, New York (2001).Also search for 'holocaust' at the IBMwebsite.
  48. Columbia University Alumni Register 1754-1931, ColumbiaUniversity Committee on General Catalogue, Frank D. Fackenthal (Chairman),Columbia University Press, New York (1932).
  49. Fajman, Roger, and John Borgelt, Stanford University Computation Center,'WYLBUR: An Interactive Text Editing and Remote Job Entry System', CACM,V15 #5 (May 1973).
  50. Eckert, W.J., Punched Card Methods in ScientificComputation, The Thomas J. Watson Astronomical Computing Bureau,Columbia University, Lancaster Press, Inc., Lancaster PA (January 1940).Reprinted in 1984 by the Charles Babbage Institute, MIT, and Tomash Publisherswith a new introduction by J.C. McPherson.
  51. IBM Oral History Project on Computer Technology, Interview TC-1, with W.J.Eckert (11 July 1964).
  52. Mackenzie, Charles E., Coded Character Sets, History andDevelopment, Addison-Wesley (1980).
  53. Trimble, George R., 'A Brief History of Computing',IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, Volume 23,Number 3 (July-September 2001).
  54. Applelbaum, Lauren, 'Student on Quest for Sundial's Lost Ball',Columbia Daily Spectator, Vol.CXXV No.139 (5 Dec 2001).
  55. Quarterman, John S., TheMatrix: Computer Networks and Conferencing Systems WorldwideDigital Press (1990).
  56. Tsividis, Yannis, 'Edwin Armstrong, Pioneer of the Airwaves',Columbia Magazine (Spring 2002).
  57. Grosch, Herbert R.J., Computer: BitSlices from a Life, Third Millenium Books, Novato CA (1991), ISBN 0-88733-085[3rd ed mss].
  58. 'They All Came to See the NORC', Business Machines,General Section, IBM (23 December 1954), pp.8-9.
  59. Grosch, Herb, private correspondence (May 2003 - 2010).
  60. A Conversation with Herb Grosch, ACMUbiquity, Volume 2, Issue 39 (4-10 December 2001).
  61. Schreiner, Ken, private correspondence (May 2003).
  62. Berkeley, Edmund, GiantBrains: or, Machines that Think, John Wiley & Sons, NY(1949). The first book about computers for a general nontechnical audience.
  63. Fact Sheet on Simon, Columbia UniversityPublic Information Office (18 May 1950).
  64. Eckert, Wallace J, and Rebecca Jones, Faster,Faster: a simple description of a giant electronic calculator and theproblems it solves, McGraw-Hill, New York (1955).
  65. King, Kenneth, private correspondence (July-August 2003).
  66. Hankam, Eric, interviews (11 July and 4 November 2003).
  67. Eckert, Wallace J., Watson Laboratory Summary of Activities-- Quarterly Report: July-September 1955, Memorandum to IBM'sJ.C. McPherson (17 November 1955).
  68. 'W.J.E.' (Wallace J. Eckert), The I.B.M. PluggableSequence Relay Calculator, MathematicalTables and Other Aids to Computation, Volume III, Number 23 (June 1948),pp. 149-161.
  69. Aspray, William (Ed.), Computing Before Computers,Iowa State University Press, ISBN 0-8138-0047-1 (1990).
  70. Ceruzzi, Paul E. Reckoners:The Prehistory of the Digital Computer, from Relays to the Stored ProgramConcept, 1935-1945 (Contributions to the Study of Computer Science,No.1), Greenwood Press (1983).
  71. Bergin, Thomas J. (Ed.), 50 Years of Army Computing:From ENIAC to MSRC, A Record of a Symposium and CelebrationNovember 13 and 14 (1996), Aberdeen Proving Ground.
  72. Ceruzzi, Paul E. 'Crossing the Divide: ArchitecturalIssues and the Emergence of the Stored Program Computer, 1935-1955',IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, Vol. 19 No. 1 (1997).
  73. Winegrad, Dilys, and Atsushi Akera,'A Short History of the Second American Revolution', Universityof Pennsylvania Almanac, Vol.42 No.18 (30 Jan 1996).On the Web HERE.
  74. John McPherson, Computer Engineer, an oral historyconducted in 1992 by William Aspray, IEEE History Center, Rutgers University,New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
  75. Grosch, Herbert R.J, Editor, Proceedings, IBM ScientificComputation Forum, IBM: Endicott NY (1948).
  76. W.J.E. (Wallace J. Eckert), 'The IBM Pluggable Sequence RelayCalculator', Mathematical Tables and Other Aids to Computation,Vol.3, No.23 (Jul 1948), pp.149-161.
  77. W.J.E. (Wallace J. Eckert) and Ralph F. Haupt, 'The Printing ofMathematical Tables', Mathematical Tables and Other Aids toComputation, Vol.2, No.17 (Jan 1947), pp.197-202.
  78. McPherson, John C., Introduction and Biographical Note on WallaceEckert in the 1984 reprint of [50].
  79. Stibitz, G.R., 'A Note on 'Is' and 'Might Be' in Computers',Mathematical Tables and Other Aids to Computation, Vol.4, No.31(Jul 1950), pp.168-169.
  80. W.J.E. (Wallace J. Eckert), 'Mathematical Tables on PunchedCards', Mathematical Tables and Other Aids to Computation,Vol.1, No.12 (Oct 1945), pp.433-436.
  81. Eckert, Wallace J., 'Calculating Machines',Encyclopedia Americana (1958).
  82. Eckert, Wallace J., Letter to Mr. G.W. Baehne, IBM, 270Broadway, NYC (9 Jan 1934).
  83. Eckert, W.J., 'Electrons and Computation', The ScientificMonthly, Vol. LXVII, No. 5 (Nov 1948).
  84. Eckert, Wallace J., Transcript, Systems Service Class No. 591(Aerial Navigation) for the US Army Air Corps; Department of Education,International Business Machines, Endicott NY (8 Sep 1944).
  85. Jones, Walter D., 'Watson and Me: A Life at IBM', edited byDon Black, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing,Vol. 25 No. 3 (Jul-Sep 2003), p.15.
  86. Eckert, W.J., 'The Astronomical Hollerith-Computing Bureau',Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific,Vol.49, No.291 (Oct 1937), pp.249-253.
  87. Smith, Harry F., interview, 8 Sep 2003.
  88. Eckert, Wallace, Correspondence and papers, 1935-1971,archived at the Charles Babbage Institute, University of Minnesota.
  89. Eckert, W.J., 'Facilities of the Watson Scientific ComputingLaboratory', Proceedings of the Research Forum, IBM, Endicott NY(Aug 1946), pp.75-84.
  90. Gutzwiller, M.C., 'Wallace Eckert, Computers, and the NauticalAlmanac Office' in Fiala, Alan D., and Steven J. Dick (editors),Proceedings, Nautical Almanac Office Sesquicentennial Symposium,U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington DC, March 3-4, 1999, pp.147-163.
  91. Baehne, George W. (IBM), Practical Applications of thePunched Card Method in Colleges and Universities,Columbia University Press (1935); hardbound, 442 pages, 257 figures.
  92. Seidelmann, P. Kenneth, Research Professor, University ofVirginia Astronomy Department, private correspondence, Sept-Oct 2003and April 2004. Prof. Seidelmann was at the US Naval Observatory from 1965to 2000 and is a historian of the Naval Observatory.
  93. Interrogation NAV No. 75, USSBS No. 378, Tokyo, 13-14 Nov 1945:Admiral Soemu Toyoda (Chief of Naval General Staff from May 1945), UnitedStates Strategic Bombing Survey [Pacific], Naval Analysis Division:Interrogations of Japanese Officials, Volume II, OPNAV-P-03-100(1946), p.319.
  94. The United States Strategic Bombing Survey: Japan'sStruggle to End the War. Chairman's Office,1 July 1946, p.13.
  95. Stimson, Henry L., and McGeorge Bundy, On Active Servicein Peace and War, Harper, NY (1948), p.618.
  96. Krawitz, Eleanor, 'The Watson Scientific Computing Laboratory:A Center for Scientific Research Using Calculating Machines',Columbia Engineering Quarterly (Nov 1949).
  97. IBM Technical Newsletter, No.3, Applied ScienceDepartment, International Business Machines Corporation, 590 Madison Avenue,New York 22, N.Y., 22-8823-0-3M-LB-P (Dec 1951).
  98. IBM Watson Lab Three-Week Course on Computing, Class Lists(1947-56).
  99. Buderi, Robert, The Invention That Changed theWorld ('How a small group of Radar pioneers won the Second World Warand launched a technological revolution'), Simon & Schuster, New York(1996).
  100. Grosch, Herbert R.J., 'Early Women in Computing',Communications of the ACM, Vol.38 No.4 (April 1995)(1996).
  101. Dick, Steven J., Sky and Ocean Joined: The U.S. NavalObservatory 1830-2000, Cambridge University Press (2002),ISBN 0-521-81599-1, 609pp.
  102. Backus, John, private correspondence, July 2004.
  103. Eames, Charlesand Ray,A Computer Perspective: Background to the Computer Age, Harvard University Press.First Edition 1973; Second Edition 1990. Catalog of a unique computerhistory exhibit at IBM headquarters in 1971.
  104. Knuth, Donald, The Art of Computer Programming,Vol.3 'Sorting and Searching', Addison-Wesley (1973);Section 5.5, pp.382-384 [the link is to the 1998 revised edition].
  105. Eckert, W.J., 'The IBM Department of Pure Science and theWatson Scientific Computing Laboratory', Educational Research Forum Proceedings, IBM, Endicott NY (Aug 1947), pp.31-36.
  106. Bellovin, Steve, personal correspondence, January 2006. Now amember of Columbia's Computer Science faculty after many years at Bell Labs/ AT&T Labs, Steve, as a Columbia student in 1968-69, worked at the IBMWatson Lab building on 115th Street doing system administration tasks on an IBM1130.
  107. Pugh, Emerson W.; Johnson, Lyle R., Palmer, John H.,IBM's360 and Early 370 Systems, MIT Press (1991).
  108. Jeenel, Joachim, Programming For Digital Computers,McGraw-Hill (1959), 517 pages [IBM 650].
  109. Andree, Richard V., Programming the IBM 650 Magnetic Drum Computerandhttp:>
  110. Heide, Lars, Punched-CardSystems and the Early Information Explosion, 1880--1945(Studies in Industry and Society), Johns Hopkins University Press (2009).
  111. Grier, David Alan, TooSoon To Tell: Essays for the End of The Computer Revolution(Perspectives), Wiley-IEEE Computer Society (2009)
  112. B. Gilchrist, J. Pomerence and S.Y. Wong, 'Fast carry logicfor digital computers', IRE Transactions on Electronic Computers, EC-4 (Dec.1955),133-136.
  113. Digital Computer Newsletter, Office of Naval Research,Mathematical Sciences Division, Vol.10, No.4, October 1958[PDF].
  114. Digital Computer Newsletter, Office of Naval Research,Mathematical Sciences Division, Vol.12, No.3, July 1960[PDF].
  115. Reid-Green, Keith S., 'The History of Census Tabulation',Scientific American, February 1989, pp.98-103.
  116. Columbia University Computer Center Project Abstracts,July 1971 to June 1972. Paperbound, about 250 pages (COVER).
  117. Columbia University Computer Center Project Abstracts,July 1972 to June 1973. Paperbound, about 250 pages (COVER).
  118. Geschichteder IBM in Deutschland (IBM).
  119. National Science Foundation,TwelfthAnnual Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1962:Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Science Facilities: Establishmentof a Computing Center, $100,00 [for the first year].
  120. Tanenbaum, Andrew S.,LessonsLearned from 30 Years of MINIX,CACM, Vol.59 No.3, March 2016, pp.70-78.
  121. Jones, Steven E, Roberto Busa, S.J., and the Emergence of Humanities Computing: The Priest and the Punched Card, Routledge (2016). Includes chapter on theSSEC.

Sources are listed in the order they were encountered. Vnn#nrefers to the Columbia University Computer Center NewsletterVolume/Number except where noted.

[ Introduction ][ Timeline ][ Epilog ][ Tables ][ Acronyms ][ Glossary ][ Sources ][ Links ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]

Links to Related or Similar Sites

Web links are notoriously unstable; don't be surprised if any or allof the following don't lead anywhere.

Columbia University:

  • Just aBeginning: Computers and Celestial Mechanics in the Work of WallaceJ. Eckert, Ph.D. Dissertation of Allan Olley, 31 August 2011.
  • Harold Hunter Channer, Interview with BruceGilchrist (former directory of the Columbia Computer Center), 31 May 2007.(Youtube).
  • TheOrigin and History of the Internet, address by Kenneth M. King(first director of the Columbia Computer Center), 17 February 2011(Youtube).
  • Columbia University's 250thAnniversary
  • Columbia University 1968, the student uprising.

Books (see Sources for other books):

Built-in Bluetooth 4.0 enables easy pairing with speakers, keyboard, and game controller, etc.With HDMI (HD Multimedia Interface), you can easily connect your Tablet into just about any TV and start streaming your favorite content and turns your game playing a much more enjoyable experience.Stunning display: With wide viewing angles up to 160 degree and 10.1 inch screen, the NeuTab N10 Plus Tablet is ideal for watching movies, playing games or reading books.A83T Octa-Core integrates Allwinner next-gen SmartColor display technology that delivers higher image quality and better visual effects. Special power-saving design: With Cortex-A7 CPU architecture and the performance power balanced GPU, NeuTab N10 Plus consumes much less power than most Quad-Core Tablets and the power-saving design allows extended battery life.Endless entertainment and incredible 3D gaming experience: With 1GB RAM and A83T processor, you can download all your favorite applications seamlessly. Octa core smartphones. The ultrafast and powerful A83T processor allows quick app launches and fluid graphics.

  • Bruderer,Herbert, Meilensteinede Rechentechnik, Band 1: Mechanische Rechenmaschinen, Rechenschieber,Historische Automaten und WissenshaftlicheInstrumente; De Gruyter Oldenbourg (2018).
  • Bruderer, Herbert, Meilensteine de Rechentechnik,Band 2: Erfindung des Computers, Elektronenrechner, Entwicklungen inDeutschland, England und der Schweiz; De Gruyter Oldenbourg (2018).
General Computing History:
  • Computers,John Savard.
  • Computer History: Storage, Software and Memory, mHelpDesk.com.
  • Zukunft braucht Herkunft(German technology notes in the Rhein-Main area).
  • Programming with Punched Cardsby Dale Fisk of IBM (PDF)
  • Technikum19Living Museum (beautiful photos of punch-card equipment)
  • The National Museum of Computing (UK)
  • ColossusCracking German Codes (video)
  • ComputerHistory Museum Youtube Channel.
  • Thewritings of Allan Olley, University of Toronto Including:
    • Just a Beginning: Computers and Celestial Mechanics in the Work ofWallace J. Eckert, op.cit.
    • Existence Precedes Essense - Meaning of the Stored-Program Concept (originally published in IFIP 325, 2010, pp.169-178.
    • Digitized Measurement: Automatic Scientific Table Making,Originally published in the Proceedings of teh XXV Scientific InstrumentCommission “East and West The Common European Heritage”, 2006,pp. 289-293.
  • A History of Computer Programming Languages, Onlinecolleplan.com.
  • IBM WatsonLaboratory (in Korean)
  • DoNot Fold, Spindle or Mutilate, the 'Hole' Story of Punched Cards byGeorge A. Fierheller, 2006 (PDF).
  • Punch Card Compendium(Donald Whittemore).
  • RememberingSome Early Computers (1948-1960) by Bruce Gilchrist, January 2006(Dr. Gilchrist was Columbia's Computer Center Director 1973-85).
  • Charles Babbage Institute(University of Minnesota)
  • History of FORTRAN and FORTRAN II, Paul McJones (ed.), Computer HistoryMuseum.
  • A BriefHistory of Computing Technology, 1943 to 1950 (Derek J. Smith).
  • Chronology ofPersonal Computers (Ken Polsson).
  • Chronology ofWorkstation Computers (Ken Polsson).
  • Historic ComputerImages (US Army)
  • ENIAC 50th Anniversary (University of Pennsylvania)
  • The IBM 7094 and CTSS (MIT)
  • IBMSTRETCH (Eric Smith)
  • IBM Stretch (7030)-- Aggressive Uniprocessor Parallelism (Mark Smotherman)
  • My IBM Careerand Some Thoughts Along the Way (Terry Judkins)
  • Interview with Ken Olsen (Smithsonian Institution).
  • A History of MTS -- 30 Years of Computing Service (U of Michigan)
  • The MichiganTerminal System (U of Michigan)
  • 40Years of Computing at Newcastle (U of Newcastle)
  • How toreally bury a mainframe (University of Manitoba), Network World,17 December 2007.
  • PunchedCards - A brief illustrated technical history, Douglas W. Jones,University of Iowa.
  • Programming with Punched Cardsby Dale Fisk of IBM (PDF).
  • Punched Cards: ABrief Tutorial by Robert V. Williams, IEEE Annals of the History ofComputing.
  • 'Do not fold, spindleor mutilate': A cultural history of the punch card by Steven Lubar.
  • StanfordUniversity History Exhibits.
  • National Archive for theHistory of Computing (UK)
  • Paul Allen's Living Computer Museum (formerly PDP Planet, aPDP-10, PDP-11, PDP-8 restoration and preservation project)
  • The Core Store (DEC section)
  • The Core Store (IBM section)
  • Computermuseum über die Entwicklung der Rechentechnik in der DDR (in German).
  • Robotron P8000 (an East German desktop workstation from 1987 still running in 2016) (in English) (German).
  • Fédération desEquipes Bull
  • Conhe莽a um bocado da Hist贸ria dos Computadores.
  • The North American Data CommunicationsMuseum (NADCOMM)
  • Dennis Ritchie's homepage (Unix history)
  • Intheir own words: Unix pioneers remember the good times
  • Computer History as'seen by' Bob Bemer (and sometimes 'made by') (Bob Bemer died in 2004)
  • Al Kossow (computer manual archive)
  • Ed Thelen(online documents)
  • 1968 DougEngelbart Mouse Presentation (videos). More about EngelbartHEREand HERE.
  • The Computer History SimulationProject -- Original documentation and software, emulators and simulators.
  • Dusty Decks (old software)
  • History of Spam(i.e. junk e-mail).

[ Introduction ][ Timeline ][ Epilog ][ Tables ][ Acronyms ][ Glossary ][ Sources ][ Links ][ SEARCH ][ FAQ ]

Frank da Cruz / fdc@columbia.edu /Columbia University Computing History /2001 - 2019